Objective The aim of the present study was to describe the demographic, clinical and immunological characteristics of patients with late-onset (≥50 years) SLE vs patients with early-onset SLE (<50 years). Methods We performed a cross-sectional retrospective study of 3619 patients from the RELESSER database (National Register of Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology). Results A total of 565 patients (15.6%) were classified as late-onset SLE and 3054 (84.4%) as early-onset SLE. The male-to-female ratio was 5:1. Mean (s.d.) age at diagnosis in the late-onset group was 57.4 (10.4) years. At diagnosis, patients with late-onset SLE had more comorbid conditions than patients with early-onset SLE; the most frequent was cardiovascular disease (P <0.005). Furthermore, diagnostic delay was longer in patients with late-onset SLE [45.3 (3.1) vs 28.1 (1.0); P <0.001]. Almost all patients with late-onset SLE (98.7%) were Caucasian. Compared with early-onset SLE and after adjustment for time since diagnosis, patients with late-onset SLE more frequently had serositis, major depression, thrombotic events, cardiac involvement and positive lupus anticoagulant values. They were also less frequently prescribed immunosuppressive agents. Mortality was greater in late-onset SLE (14.3% vs 4.7%; P <0.001). Conclusion Late-onset SLE is insidious, with unusual clinical manifestations that can lead to diagnostic errors. Clinical course is generally indolent. Compared with early-onset disease, activity is generally reduced and immunosuppressants are less commonly used. Long-term prospective studies are necessary to determine whether the causes of death are associated with clinical course or with age-associated comorbidities in this population.
2. Caralis PV, Davis B, Wright K, Marcial E. The influence of ethnicity and race on attitudes toward advance directives, life-prolonging treatment, and euthanasia. J Clin Ethics 1993;4:155-165. PARRY ROMBERG SYNDROME AND LINEAR SCLERODERMA IN COUP DE SABRE MIMICKING RASMUSSEN ENCEPHALITIS
BackgroundAntiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) have been associated with organ damage and certain features in SLE patients.ObjectivesOur aim was to investigate the differences between SLE patients according to the presence of aPL and/or clinical antiphospholipid syndrome.MethodsPatients from the RELESSER-T registry were included. RELESSER-T is a multicenter, hospital-based registry, with retrospective cross-sectional collection of data from a large representative sample of adult non-selected patients with SLE attending Spanish rheumatology services from the public national health system.ResultsWe included 3651 SLE patients and 1368 were positive for aPL (44.9% of patients were positive for anticardiolipin antibodies, 27.3% showed positivity for anti b2glycoprotein I and 24% for lupus anticoagulant). Overall 2283 patients were classified as SLE no aPL, 528 as SLE-APS and 840 as SLE-aPL. Demographic data, clinical and laboratory features in the different groups are showed in Table 1. Regarding cardiovascular risk factors, SLE-APS patients had higher rates of hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes than SLE-aPL and SLE no aPL patients (p< 0.001, p< 0.001 and p=0,022, respectively). SLE-APS patients showed a lower prevalence of photosensitivity and higher frequencies of serositis, proteinuria (>0.5 grs), urinary cell casts, seizures and psychosis (p≤0.001). Overall, SLE-APS patients showed a lower rate of cutaneous manifestations and higher rates of neuropsychiatric, cardiac, pulmonary, renal, joint and ophthalmological manifestations (Table 1). In accordance with a more severe clinical profile, higher frequency of anti-DNA antibodies and hypocomplementemia were observed in the SLE-APS group (p<0.001). In addition to a higher disease activity (SLEDAI), SLE APS patients presented more damage accrual with higher values in SLICC (1.9±2.2 in SLE APS, 0.9±1. 4 in SLE aPL and 1.1±1.6, p<0.001) and Katz indexes (3±1.8 in SLE APS, 2.7±1.7 in SLE aPL and 2.6±1.6 in SLE no aPL, p <0.001).ConclusionSLE-APS patients show a more severe clinical profile with higher frequency of major organ involvement and more damage accrual than SLE-aPL and SLE no APL.Disclosure of InterestsLeyre Riancho-Zarrabeitia Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Pfizer, UCB, MSD, GSK, Amgen, Roche travel grants, Victor Martinez Taboada: None declared, Iñigo Rua-Figueroa: None declared, Fernando Sánchez-Alonso: None declared, María Galindo-Izquierdo: None declared, Juan Ovalles: None declared, Alejandro Olivé Grant/research support from: ND, Consultant for: ND, Paid instructor for: ND, Speakers bureau: ND, Antonio Fernandez-Nebro: None declared, Jaime Calvo Consultant for: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Celgene, Sanofi Genzyme, Speakers bureau: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Raúl Menor Almagro: None declared, Eva Tomero Muriel: None declared, Esther Uriarte Isacelaya: None declared, Alina Boteanu: None declared, Mariano Andres: None declared, Mercedes Freire González: None declared, Gregorio Santos Soler: None declared, Esther Ruiz Lucea: None declared, Mónica Ibañez Ba...
Background:The mortality in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) varies largely across different countries most probably due to social, healthcare and ethnic differences.Objectives:To analyze the causes and identify predictive factors of mortality of SLE in Spain in the present century.Methods:We performed a cross-sectional and retrospective study analyzing data from the RELESSER cohort (Spanish Registry of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology). We included all patients diagnosed with SLE since the year 2000 and recorded sociodemographic, clinical and serological variables, comorbidities and treatments, as well as indicators of disease activity, damage and severity. The characteristics of the deceased patients were compared with those of the survivors, and variables with clinical significance or statistical significance were grouped into multivariate models to determine which ones were independently associated with the outcome of the disease.Results:A total of 2004 patients were included, 88.6% female, the mean age at diagnosis was 38.3 (± 15.3) years, with a mean delay in diagnosis of 28.9 (± 52.6) months. Up to 2.84% of the individuals had died. The leading cause of death was SLE activity (n=16), followed by infections (n=14), vascular events (n=7) and cancer (n=6). The mean age of death was 54.68 (± 20.13) years, and neither age, sex nor delay in diagnosis was independently associated with mortality. The presence of nephritis, depression, severe infections, organ damage (SLICC/ACR DI) or disease activity (SLEDAI), as well as the use of cyclophosphamide, rituximab or high doses of corticosteroids, were predictors of mortality in our cohort. Antimalarial treatment and skin manifestations were linked to improved survival.Conclusion:In the RELESSER cohort, clinical factors, co-morbidities, as well as therapeutic attitudes were associated with a significant increase in mortality in SLE. Interestingly, depression was independently associated to mortality. The activity of the disease and infections continue to be the main causes of death at the beginning of the 21st century amongst our patients.Disclosure of Interests:Clara Moriano: None declared, Jaime Calvo Grant/research support from: Lilly, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Jansen, Celgene, Iñigo Rua-Figueroa: None declared, Elvira Diez Alvarez: None declared, Cristina Bermúdez: None declared, Francisco J López-Longo Grant/research support from: AbbVie and GSK, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Actelion, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB Pharma, María Galindo-Izquierdo: None declared, Alejandro Olive: None declared, Eva Tomero Muriel: None declared, Antonio Fernandez-Nebro: None declared, Mercedes Freire González: None declared, Olaia Fernández- Berrizbeitia: None declared, Ana Pérez Gómez: None declared, Esther Uriarte Isacelaya: None declared, Carlos Marras Fernandez Cid: None declared, Carlos A. Montilla-Morales: None declared, Gregorio Santos Soler: None declared, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, and MSD, M. Rodíguez-Gómez: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, Alina Boteanu: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Victor Martinez Taboada: None declared, Blanca Hernández-Cruz Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Lilly, Sanofi, BMS, STADA, José Luis Andreu: None declared, José A Hernandez Beriain: None declared, Lorena Expósito: None declared, Raúl Menor-Almagro: None declared, Mónica Ibañez Barceló: None declared, Ivan Castellví Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Kern Pharma, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Carles Galisteo: None declared, Enrique Raya: None declared, Víctor Quevedo Vila: None declared, Tomas Vazquez Rodriguez: None declared, Jesus Ibañez: None declared, Jose M Pego-Reigosa: None declared
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.