With the increasing use of concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in the treatment of advanced head and neck carcinoma, surgery has lost ground as the first therapy and is reserved as a salvage treatment in cases of locoregional failure. The objective of our study was to review our experience in patients who had a local or regional recurrence after treatment with CCRT. Thirty-two patients underwent salvage surgery after CCRT: 24 were treated with a local or locoregional resection and 8 patients with a neck dissection only. In patients who had surgery involving the primary location of the tumor, some kind of reconstruction was required in 83% of cases. One or more postoperative complications occurred in nine patients. The median hospital stay was 18.5 days. There was a significant difference in hospital stay in relation to the appearance of surgical complications. Five-year adjusted survival after salvage surgery was 34.2% (CI 95% 13.2-55.2%). Adjusted survival was related to the status of the resection margins and appearance of neck nodes with extracapsular spread in the neck dissection. In conclusion, salvage surgery after CCRT involves extensive resections, requiring reconstruction techniques with regional or microanastomosed free flaps in most cases, achieving acceptable outcomes.
The inclusion of information about ECS in the neck dissection improved the prognostic classification of patients with HNSCC in relation to the pTNM classification.
After a local and/or regional recurrence of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) not all patients are candidates to salvage treatment. The objective of this study was to identify the variables related to performance of salvage surgery with curative intent in these patients. We performed a retrospective study of 1088 HNSCC patients with a local and/or regional recurrence. According to a multivariate analysis, the variables related to performance of salvage surgery were the Karnofsky index, the location and extension of the primary tumor, the initial treatment, the disease-free interval between treatment of the initial tumor and diagnosis of the recurrence, and the year the recurrence was diagnosed. Considering salvage surgery as the dependent variable, the results of a recursive partitioning analysis defined four categories of patients in function of the category of local and regional extension of the initial tumor, the location of the primary tumor, the initial treatment and the disease-free interval between treatment of the initial tumor and diagnosis of the recurrence.
In view of the current controversy about the relative merits of subtotal versus total parathyroidectomy plus autograft for the treatment of parathyroid hyperplasia, we reviewed the results of subtotal parathyroidectomy in 6 patients with hyperparathyroidism after successful renal transplantation. All had normal renal function and hypercalcemia (mean 11.4 mg/100 ml). The time elapsed between renal transplantation and parathyroidectomy ranged from 3 months to 10 years (mean 42 months). The indications for subtotal parathyroidectomy were: severe acute hypercalcemia after transplantation (1 case), persistent asymptomatic hypercalcemia (2 cases), allograft iithiasis (2 cases), and bone disease (1 case). Subtotal parathyroidectomy was performed, aiming to leave about 30-50 mg of parathyroid tissue, and included a routine transcervical thymectomy. The weight of resected tissue ranged between 0.6 and 2.4 g per patient (mean 1.58 g). Immediate control of hypercalcemia was achieved in all cases. No patient needed replacement therapy with calcium and/or vitamin D after the operation. The 6 patients were followed from 8 months to 4.5 years (mean 34 months) and all had normal calcium, phosphate, and alkaline phosphatase serum values at the time of their last visit. A reappraisal of the surgical indications for hypercalcemia after renal transplantation is needed because severe longterm complications (allograft lithiasis) may develop in patients with minimal hypercalcemia. Subtotal parathyroidectomy is a good operation for treating hyperparathyroidism in patients with functioning renal allografts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.