Purpose
To assess and compare the value of FDG-PET to combined 111In-labeled leukocyte/99mTc-sulfur colloid bone marrow (WBC/BM) imaging for diagnosing infection in hip and knee prostheses.
Methods
In this prospective study, patients with painful hip or knee arthroplasty, who were scheduled to undergo clinical and diagnostic evaluation for prosthesis revision were included. They have been studied by using FDG-PET and 111In-labeled leukocyte/99mTc-sulfur colloid bone marrow scan. This study was IRB approved and HIPAA compliant. All patients provided written informed consent.
Results
A total of 134 hip and 87 knee prostheses, suspected of being either infected or non-infectious loosening were evaluated. All 221 prostheses underwent FDG-PET, whereas both WBC/BM imaging and FDG-PET was performed in 88 prostheses. The initial analysis of data from the WBC/BM images demonstrated somewhat results compared to those of FDG-PET scans on 88 patients. Also, some patients were not willing to undergo both procedures and therefore participate in this study. Therefore, a decision was made to eliminate WBC/BM imaging from the procedures for the remainder of this research study. This decision was reached partly due to the significant radiation dose delivered from labeled WBC as well as safety issues related to preparing these labeled cells. Final diagnosis was based on microbiological examinations of the surgical specimens in 125 prostheses and joint aspirations combined with the clinical follow-up of 6 months or more in 86 prostheses. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of FDG-PET in hip prostheses were 81.8%, 93.1%, 79.4%, and 94.0%, respectively and in knee prostheses were 94.7%, 88.2%, 69.2%, and 98.4% respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of WBC/BM imaging in hip prostheses were 38.5%, 95.7%, 71.4%, and 84.6%, respectively and in knee prostheses were 33.3%, 88.5%, 25.0%, and 92.0%, respectively. In those cases that underwent both FDG-PET and WBC/BM imaging, there was a trend (P=0.0625) towards a higher sensitivity for FDG-PET in hip prostheses, whereas other comparisons did not show any significant differences between the two imaging modalities.
Conclusion
Based on this study, the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET scan in detecting infection in painful hip and knee prostheses is optimal for routine clinical application. Considering the complexity and costs of WBC/BM imaging and related safety issues associated with this preparation, FDG-PET appears to be an appropriate alternative for assessing these patients.