Age (>60 vs ≤60), type of cordectomy (≥IV vs ≤III), status of margins, fixed arytenoid, and pathologic T classification, were the variables associated with RFS, OS, and organ-preservation rate. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Head Neck 39: 71-81, 2017.

No abstract

No abstract

UBC9, the sole E2-conjugating enzyme required for SUMOylation, is a key regulator of essential cellular functions and, as such, is frequently altered in cancers. Along these lines, we recently reported that its expression gradually increases during early stages of human papillomavirus (HPV)-mediated cervical lesions transformation. However, a better understanding of how UBC9 is exploited by transforming viral oncoproteins is still needed. In the present study, we show that in human samples HPV drives UBC9 up-regulation also in very early steps of head and neck tumorigenesis, pointing to the important role for UBC9 in the HPV-mediated carcinogenic program. Moreover, using HPV-infected pre-cancerous tissues and primary human keratinocytes as the natural host of the virus, we investigate the pathological meaning and the cellular mechanisms responsible for UBC9 de-regulation in an oncoviral context. Our results show that UBC9 overexpression is promoted by transforming viral proteins to increase host cells’ resistance to apoptosis. In addition, ultrastuctural, pharmacological and genetic approaches crucially unveil that UBC9 is physiologically targeted by autophagy in human cells. However, the presence of HPV E6/E7 oncoproteins negatively impacts the autophagic process through selective inhibition of autophagosome-lysosome fusion, finally leading to p53 dependent UBC9 accumulation during viral-induced cellular transformation. Therefore, our study elucidates how UBC9 is manipulated by HPV oncoproteins, details the physiological mechanism by which UBC9 is degraded in cells, and identifies how HPV E6/E7 impact on autophagy. These findings point to UBC9 and autophagy as novel hallmarks of HPV oncogenesis, and open innovative avenues towards the treatment of HPV-related malignancies.

TORS seems as safe and effective as TLM. Shorter TORS operating times are probably attributable to prior experience with TLM. For laryngeal exposure, length of tube placement and margin evaluability, TLM was superior; however, this may change as TORS develops and transoral robotic instruments are optimized.

Eighty patients affected by supraglottic cancer were treated by transoral carbon dioxide laser surgery between 1989 and 2006 in two Italian institutions. Patient staging was as follows: 2 pTis, 20 pT1, 38 pT2, and 20 pT3. Simultaneous or 1-month delayed neck dissection (ND) was performed on 27 (34%) patients, unilaterally in 10 and bilaterally in 17. The pN category was as follows: 9 pN0, 6 pN1, 8 pN2b, and 4 pN2c. A total of 16 (20%) patients received complementary radiotherapy (RT) and 5 (6%) were subjected to chemo-RT for persistent tumor after re-excision due to positive margins, multiple lymph nodes, and/or extracapsular spread after ND. The last follow-up was in December 2008. The 5-year overall, disease-specific and disease-free survivals, local control with laser alone, and organ preservation rates calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis were 84.4, 97.4, 88.3, 96, and 97.2%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed a statistically significant impact on disease-free survival, local control with laser alone, and organ preservation of pT category (p = 0.009, p = 0.01, and p = 0.03, respectively), while pN category and tumor stage negatively influenced disease-free survival (p = 0.007 and p = 0.01, respectively). This series confirms the good overall oncologic outcomes obtained by transoral laser surgery for Tis, T1, T2, and selected T3 supraglottic cancer with minimal pre-epiglottic space involvement.

Laser removal of early glottic cancer is oncologically adequate with margins greater than 1 mm from the tumor edge. Positive margins require further treatment; close margins may require further treatment depending on tumor characteristics.

Background Surgery of tongue tumors includes different procedures ranging from mucosal resection to complex combined resection. Numerous terms have been used to describe such procedures, but there is no consensus between the terminology and the extent of resection. Methods and Results We searched the medical literature and found a lack of published information. We undertook to describe a new classification of surgical procedures for tongue tumor resection. We based it upon the surgical anatomy of the tongue and the spread of the cancer. We posited that there were five major types of glossectomy embracing all the methods of tongue cancer resection. This classification was reviewed and endorsed by an international team of experts. Conclusion We propose a more precise classification than that currently in practice, thereby bringing clarity and consistency to the terminology, facilitating shared communication between surgeons, comparison between published research, and ultimately improving surgical practice and patient care.