Background and Objectives. Mucosal healing (MH) is considered an important therapeutic goal in ulcerative colitis (UC). We evaluate the severity of intestinal inflammation and clarify the relation between MH and long-term outcomes. Methods. The study group comprised 38 patients with UC in clinical remission on total colonoscopy who were followed up for at least 5 years. Clinical remission was defined as a Mayo score of 0 for both stool frequency and rectal bleeding. Colonoscopic findings were evaluated into 4 grades according to the Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES). Results. During clinical remission, the MES was 0 in only 24% of the patients, 1 in 40%, 2 in 26%, and 3 in 10%. Seventy-six percent of the patients thus had active disease on colonoscopy. After initial colonoscopy, the cumulative rate of remission maintenance was 100% in MES 0, 1 in 93%, 2 in 70%, and 3 in 50% at 6 months and 78%, 40%, 10%, and 0%, respectively, at 5 years (P < 0.001). Conclusion. Many patients with UC in clinical remission have active lesions. Patients with a higher MES have a higher rate of recurrence. To improve long-term outcomes, an MES of 0 should be the treatment goal.
We describe the first patient with hereditary spherocytosis (HS) known to have developed splenic infarction following infectious mononucleosis (IM). An 18-year-old Japanese man was referred to our hospital in November 2004 because of continuous fever and icterus. He had undergone cholecystectomy at the age of 14 years. On patient admission in November 2004, a physical examination showed marked hepatosplenomegaly, icterus, and jaundice. He had a white blood cell count of 14.9 x 10(9)/L with 9.5% atypical lymphocytes, a red blood cell count of 2.93 x 10(12)/L, and a hemoglobin concentration of 7.8 g/dL. Microspherocytes were observed in the patient's peripheral blood smear, and immunoglobulin M antibody to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) viral capsid antigen was detected. The patient's diagnosis was HS with IM. On day 4 of admission, the patient complained of severe abdominal pain. Abdominal computed tomography scanning revealed findings of splenic infarction. Two months after the occurrence of splenic infarction, a splenectomy was performed. A pathohistologic examination of the resected spleen revealed no evidence of thrombosis or arterial occlusion. We assume that the cause of splenic infarction was insufficient blood flow to oxygenate the entire spleen during the acute enlargement of the spleen.
Although previous studies have shown that patients with ulcerative colitis may benefit from treatment with vedolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the α β integrin heterodimer, no data exist in Japanese populations. The aim of this phase 1, open-label, multicenter study was to assess the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety of vedolizumab in Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis. Adult patients with confirmed ulcerative colitis received either 150 mg (step 1) or 300 mg (step 2) of intravenous (IV) vedolizumab on days 1, 15, and 43 of the study protocol. Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, safety, and efficacy parameters were all assessed through study end (day 239). Nine patients were enrolled in this study (150 mg, n = 3; 300 mg, n = 6). Patients who received vedolizumab IV 300 mg had approximately twice the drug exposure of those receiving vedolizumab IV 150 mg (day 1 AUC 744 vs 408 μg·d/mL) and a longer-lasting maximal saturation of α β integrin (155 vs 99 days). The number of treatment-emergent adverse events, all of which were mild or moderate in intensity, was similar between the 150-mg (15 events) and 300-mg (20 events) groups. The 2 patients (150 mg group) not in clinical remission by partial Mayo score at the start of the study met the criteria for clinical remission on days 15 and 155 of the study, respectively. In conclusion, in Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis, vedolizumab showed similar pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic results to those seen in non-Japanese patients. Vedolizumab was well tolerated and demonstrated clinical activity consistent with previous studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.