2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic performance of EUS for evaluating the invasion depth of early colorectal cancers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Type 2B-high lesions, because they alone cannot be identified with SM-d carcinoma, further examination is necessary to differentiate HGD and SM-s carcinoma from SM-d carcinoma, thereby avoiding unnecessary surgery. To determine the appropriate treatment method (endoscopic resection or surgery) for Type 2B-high lesions, pit pattern diagnosis using chromoagents 45,46 or endoscopic ultrasonography 47,48 is necessary to diagnose the correct invasion depth. However, no additional examination is necessary for Type 2B-low lesions because most of these are appropriate for endoscopic resection (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Type 2B-high lesions, because they alone cannot be identified with SM-d carcinoma, further examination is necessary to differentiate HGD and SM-s carcinoma from SM-d carcinoma, thereby avoiding unnecessary surgery. To determine the appropriate treatment method (endoscopic resection or surgery) for Type 2B-high lesions, pit pattern diagnosis using chromoagents 45,46 or endoscopic ultrasonography 47,48 is necessary to diagnose the correct invasion depth. However, no additional examination is necessary for Type 2B-low lesions because most of these are appropriate for endoscopic resection (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For colorectal LSTs associated with findings suggesting submucosal or deeper invasion on colonoscopic examination, including chromoendoscopy, the pit pattern of the lesions was diagnosed on magnifying endoscopy, and the depth of invasion was additionally evaluated on endoscopic ultrasonography [9][10][11] . Lesions that were considered to locally invade the mucosa or slightly invade the submucosa on the basis of the colonoscopic findings and were evaluated to be resectable endoscopically were resected by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).…”
Section: Endoscopic Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endoscopic ultrasound or magnification colonoscopy have been used to differentiate T1b from Tis/T1a stage CRC. A miniprobe ultrasound had high accuracy (88 %) in discriminating Tis from T1 CRC [8]. Pit pattern assessment using magnification colonoscopy has also resulted in a high sensitivity (85.6 %) and high specificity (99.4 %) [9,10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%