High-intensity resistance exercise training is a feasible and effective means of counteracting muscle weakness and physical frailty in very elderly people. In contrast, multi-nutrient supplementation without concomitant exercise does not reduce muscle weakness or physical frailty.

The recommendation for older adults is similar to the updated ACSM/AHA recommendation for adults, but has several important differences including: the recommended intensity of aerobic activity takes into account the older adult's aerobic fitness; activities that maintain or increase flexibility are recommended; and balance exercises are recommended for older adults at risk of falls. In addition, older adults should have an activity plan for achieving recommended physical activity that integrates preventive and therapeutic recommendations. The promotion of physical activity in older adults should emphasize moderate-intensity aerobic activity, muscle-strengthening activity, reducing sedentary behavior, and risk management.

OBJECTIVE -To determine the efficacy of high-intensity progressive resistance training (PRT) on glycemic control in older adults with type 2 diabetes.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -We performed a 16-week randomized controlled trial in 62 Latino older adults (40 women and 22 men; mean Ϯ SE age 66 Ϯ 8 years) with type 2 diabetes randomly assigned to supervised PRT or a control group. Glycemic control, metabolic syndrome abnormalities, body composition, and muscle glycogen stores were determined before and after the intervention.RESULTS -Sixteen weeks of PRT (three times per week) resulted in reduced plasma glycosylated hemoglobin levels (from 8.7 Ϯ 0.3 to 7.6 Ϯ 0.2%), increased muscle glycogen stores (from 60.3 Ϯ 3.9 to 79.1 Ϯ 5.0 mmol glucose/kg muscle), and reduced the dose of prescribed diabetes medication in 72% of exercisers compared with the control group, P ϭ 0.004 -0.05. Control subjects showed no change in glycosylated hemoglobin, a reduction in muscle glycogen (from 61.4 Ϯ 7.7 to 47.2 Ϯ 6.7 mmol glucose/kg muscle), and a 42% increase in diabetes medications. PRT subjects versus control subjects also increased lean mass (ϩ1.2 Ϯ 0.2 vs. Ϫ0.1 Ϯ 0.1 kg), reduced systolic blood pressure (-9.7 Ϯ 1.6 vs. ϩ7.7 Ϯ 1.9 mmHg), and decreased trunk fat mass (Ϫ0.7 Ϯ 0.1 vs. ϩ0.8 Ϯ 0.1 kg; P ϭ 0.01-0.05).CONCLUSIONS -PRT as an adjunct to standard of care is feasible and effective in improving glycemic control and some of the abnormalities associated with the metabolic syndrome among high-risk older adults with type 2 diabetes.

Objective-To issue a recommendation on the types and amounts of physical activity needed to improve and maintain health in older adults. Participants-A panel of scientists with expertise in public health, behavioral science, epidemiology, exercise science, medicine, and gerontology. Evidence-The expert panel reviewed existing consensus statements and relevant evidence from primary research articles and reviews of the literature. Process: After drafting a recommendation for the older adult population and reviewing drafts of the Updated Recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) and the American Heart Association (AHA) for Adults, the panel issued a final recommendation on physical activity for older adults. Summary-The recommendation for older adults is similar to the updated ACSM/AHA recommendation for adults, but has several important differences including: the recommended intensity of aerobic activity takes into account the older adult's aerobic fitness; activities that maintain or increase flexibility are recommended; and balance exercises are recommended for older adults at risk of falls. In addition, older adults should have an activity plan for achieving recommended physical activity that integrates preventive and therapeutic recommendations. The promotion of physical activity in older adults should emphasize moderate-intensity aerobic activity, muscle-strengthening activity, reducing sedentary behavior, and risk management.

Weight-bearing physical activity has beneficial effects on bone health across the age spectrum. Physical activities that generate relatively highintensity loading forces, such as plyometrics, gymnastics, and high-intensity resistance training, augment bone mineral accrual in children and adolescents. Further, there is some evidence that exercise-induced gains in bone mass in children are maintained into adulthood, suggesting that physical activity habits during childhood may have long-lasting benefits on bone health. It is not yet possible to describe in detail an exercise program for children and adolescents that will optimize peak bone mass, because quantitative dose-response studies are lacking. However, evidence from multiple small randomized, controlled trials suggests that the following exercise prescription will augment bone mineral accrual in children and adolescents: Mode: impact activities, such as gymnastics, plyometrics, and jumping, and moderate intensity resistance training; participation in sports that involve running and jumping (soccer, basketball) is likely to be of benefit, but scientific evidence is lacking Intensity: high, in terms of bone-loading forces; for safety reasons, resistance training should be Ͻ60% of 1-repetition maximum (1RM) Frequency: at least 3 d⅐wk Ϫ1 Duration: 10-20 min (2 times per day or more may be more effective)

Objective:The objective was to test the hypothesis that a community-based environmental change intervention could prevent weight gain in young children (7.6 Ϯ 1.0 years). Research Methods and Procedures:A non-randomized controlled trial was conducted in three culturally diverse urban cities in Massachusetts. Somerville was the intervention community; two socio-demographically-matched cities were control communities. Children (n ϭ 1178) in grades 1 to 3 attending public elementary schools participated in an intervention designed to bring the energy equation into balance by increasing physical activity options and availability of healthful foods within the before-, during-, afterschool, home, and community environments. Many groups and individuals within the community (including children, parents, teachers, school food service providers, city departments, policy makers, healthcare providers, before-and after-school programs, restaurants, and the media) were engaged in the intervention. The main outcome measure was change in BMI z-score. Results:At baseline, 44% (n ϭ 385), 36% (n ϭ 561), and 43% (n ϭ 232) of children were above the 85th percentile for BMI z-score in the intervention and the two control communities, respectively. In the intervention community, BMI z-score decreased by Ϫ0.1005 (p ϭ 0.001, 95% confidence interval, Ϫ0.1151 to Ϫ0.0859) compared with children in the control communities after controlling for baseline covariates. Discussion: A community-based environmental change intervention decreased BMI z-score in children at high risk for obesity. These results are significant given the obesigenic environmental backdrop against which the intervention occurred. This model demonstrates promise for communities throughout the country confronted with escalating childhood obesity rates.

Background The role of strength training in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is unclear. Benefits of supervised treadmill exercise in PAD patients without intermittent claudication (IC) are not established. Objective To determine whether supervised treadmill exercise and lower extremity resistance training, respectively, improve functional performance compared to a control group in PAD persons with and without IC. Design Randomized controlled clinical trial performed between 4/1/04 and 8/19/08. Participants 156 people with PAD (ankle brachial index ≤ 0.95), including 81.4% without IC. Measurements Primary outcomes were six-minute walk performance and the short physical performance battery (SPPB). Additional outcomes were brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD), treadmill walking performance, the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), and the Short-Form 36 Physical Functioning score (SF-36 PF). Interventions Three parallel arms: supervised treadmill exercise, supervised lower extremity resistance training, and a control group. Results Compared to control, the treadmill exercise group increased six-minute walk distance (+35.9 meters, 95% confidence interval (CI), +15.3 to +56.5; P <0.001), while the resistance trained group did not improve (+12.4 meters, 95% CI, −8.42 to +33.3; P=0.24). Neither exercise group improved the SPPB. Compared to control, treadmill exercise improved brachial artery FMD (+1.53%, 95% CI, +0.35 to +2.70, P=0.018), time on treadmill (+3.44 minutes, 95% CI, +2.05 to +4.84; P<0.001), the WIQ distance score P=0.015), and the SF-36 PF score (P=0.02). Compared to control, resistance training improved time on treadmill (+1.98 minutes, 95% CI, +0.56 to +3.39; P=0.007), the WIQ distance score (P=0.02), the WIQ stair climbing score (P=0.02), and the SF-36 PF score (P=0.04). Conclusion Supervised treadmill exercise improved six-minute walk distance, treadmill walking performance, brachial artery FMD, and quality of life, but not the SPPB, in PAD participants with and without classic IC symptoms. Resistance training improved treadmill walking performance, quality of life, and stair climbing ability in patients with PAD.

Hispanics are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality due to their high prevalence of diabetes and poor glycemic control. Strength training is the most effective lifestyle intervention to increase muscle mass but limited data is available in older adults with diabetes. We determined the influence of strength training on muscle quality (strength per unit of muscle mass), skeletal muscle fiber hypertrophy, and metabolic control including insulin resistance (Homeostasis Model Assessment –HOMA-IR), C-Reactive Protein (CRP), adiponectin and Free Fatty Acid (FFA) levels in Hispanic older adults. Sixty-two community-dwelling Hispanics (>55 y) with type 2 diabetes were randomized to 16 weeks of strength training plus standard care (ST group) or standard care alone (CON group). Skeletal muscle biopsies and biochemical measures were taken at baseline and 16 weeks. The ST group show improved muscle quality (mean±SE: 28±3) vs CON (-4±2, p<0.001) and increased type I (860±252µm2) and type II fiber cross-sectional area (720±285µm2) compared to CON (type I: -164±290µm2, p=0.04; and type II: -130±336µm2, p=0.04). This was accompanied by reduced insulin resistance [ST: median (interquartile range) -0.7(3.6) vs CON: 0.8(3.8), p=0.05]; FFA (ST: -84±30µmol/L vs CON: 149±48µmol/L, p=0.02); and CRP [ST: -1.3(2.9)mg/L vs CON: 0.4(2.3)mg/L, p=0.05]. Serum adiponectin increased with ST [1.0(1.8)µg/mL] compared to CON [-1.2(2.2)µg/mL, p<0.001]. Strength training improved muscle quality and whole-body insulin sensitivity. Decreased inflammation and increased adiponectin levels were related with improved metabolic control. Further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms associated with these findings. However, these data show that strength training is an exercise modality to consider as an adjunct of standard of care in high risk populations with type 2 diabetes.