In adults undergoing hip fracture surgery, regional anesthesia may reduce postoperative delirium, but there is uncertainty about its effectiveness.OBJECTIVE To investigate, in older adults undergoing surgical repair for hip fracture, the effects of regional anesthesia on the incidence of postoperative delirium compared with general anesthesia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSA randomized, allocation-concealed, open-label, multicenter clinical trial of 950 patients, aged 65 years and older, with or without preexisting dementia, and a fragility hip fracture requiring surgical repair from 9 university teaching hospitals in Southeastern China. Participants were enrolled between October 2014 and September 2018; 30-day follow-up ended November 2018.INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive either regional anesthesia (spinal, epidural, or both techniques combined with no sedation; n = 476) or general anesthesia (intravenous, inhalational, or combined anesthetic agents; n = 474).MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcome was incidence of delirium during the first 7 postoperative days. Secondary outcomes analyzed in this article include delirium severity, duration, and subtype; postoperative pain score; length of hospitalization; 30-day all-cause mortality; and complications. RESULTS Among 950 randomized patients (mean age, 76.5 years; 247 [26.8%] male), 941 were evaluable for the primary outcome (6 canceled surgery and 3 withdrew consent). Postoperative delirium occurred in 29 (6.2%) in the regional anesthesia group vs 24 (5.1%) in the general anesthesia group (unadjusted risk difference [RD], 1.1%; 95% CI, -1.7% to 3.8%; P = .48; unadjusted relative risk [RR], 1.2 [95% CI, 0.7 to 2.0]; P = .57]). Mean severity score of delirium was 23.0 vs 24.1, respectively (unadjusted difference, -1.1; 95% CI, -4.6 to 3.1). A single delirium episode occurred in 16 (3.4%) vs 10 (2.1%) (unadjusted RD, 1.1%; 95% CI, -1.7% to 3.9%; RR, 1.6 [95% CI, 0.7 to 3.5]). Hypoactive subtype in 11 (37.9%) vs 5 (20.8%) (RD, 11.5; 95% CI, -11.0% to 35.7%; RR, 2.2 [95% CI, 0.8 to 6.3]). Median worst pain score was 0 (IQR, 0 to 20) vs 0 (IQR, 0 to 10) (difference 0; 95% CI, 0 to 0). Median length of hospitalization was 7 days (IQR, 5 to 10) vs 7 days (IQR, 6 to 10) (difference 0; 95% CI, 0 to 0). Death occurred in 8 (1.7%) vs 4 (0.9%) (unadjusted RD, -0.8%; 95% CI, -2.2% to 0.7%; RR, 2.0 [95% CI, 0.6 to 6.5]). Adverse events were reported in 106 episodes in the regional anesthesia group and 102 in the general anesthesia group; the most frequently reported adverse events were nausea and vomiting (47 [44.3%] vs 34 [33.3%]) and postoperative hypotension (13 [12.3%] vs 10 [9.8%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEIn patients aged 65 years and older undergoing hip fracture surgery, regional anesthesia without sedation did not significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium compared with general anesthesia.
BACKGROUND: The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is gaining popularity in lumbar fusion for postoperative pain management. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the changes of opioid consumption after surgery, the range of cold temperature sensory blockade, pain, and safety. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled study. SETTING: Single center. METHODS: Patients who were randomized to ESPB with 0.375% ropivacaine (ropivacaine group) and mock ESPB with saline (saline group) and underwent posterior lumbar fusion surgery. The primary endpoint was the total dosage of oxycodone. Secondary endpoints included remifentanil consumption, postoperative pain scores, postoperative adverse events, safety, and range of cold hypoesthesia. RESULTS: Oxycodone consumption in the first 48 hours after surgery was significantly lower in the ropivacaine group than in the saline group (P < 0.05). Remifentanil consumption was significantly lower in the ropivacaine group compared with the saline group during the surgery (0.69 ± 0.03 mg vs. 0.85 ± 0.04 mg, P < 0.05). The areas of cold hypoesthesia were identified in the ropivacaine group after the block, but not in the saline group. Rest and exercise pain scores after surgery were significantly lower in the ropivacaine group than in the saline group (P < 0.05). The overall safety of the ropivacaine group were generally comparable to that of the saline group. LIMITATIONS: The areas of cold hypoesthesia were tested at different time points after ESPB, but the area of sensory loss was not tested, and the recovery of postoperative sensation was not recorded. In addition, we tested only temperature sensation, but not acupuncture pain. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided lumbar ESPB reduces the amount of analgesics required during and after lumbar fusion and reduces the postoperative Visual Analog Scale pain score. KEY WORDS: Erector spinae plane block, lumbar fusion, analgesia, opioid dose, randomized controlled study, ropivacaine, Visual Analog Scale pain score, postoperative
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.