Osteoarthritis is the most common musculoskeletal disease and the leading cause of disability globally. Here, we perform a genome-wide association study for osteoarthritis (77,052 cases and 378,169 controls), analysing 4 phenotypes: knee osteoarthritis, hip osteoarthritis, knee and/or hip osteoarthritis, and any osteoarthritis. We discover 64 signals, 52 of them novel, more than doubling the number of established disease loci. Six signals fine map to a single variant. We identify putative effector genes by integrating eQTL colocalization, fine-mapping, human rare disease, animal model, and osteoarthritis tissue expression data. We find enrichment for genes underlying monogenic forms of bone development diseases, and for the collagen formation and extracellular matrix organisation biological pathways. Ten of the likely effector genes, including TGFB1 , FGF18 , CTSK and IL11 have therapeutics approved or in clinical trials, with mechanisms of action supportive of evaluation for efficacy in osteoarthritis.

Detangling gene-disease connections Many diseases are at least partially due to genetic causes that are not always understood or targetable with specific treatments. To provide insight into the biology of various human diseases as well as potential leads for therapeutic development, Pietzner et al . undertook detailed, genome-wide proteogenomic mapping. The authors analyzed thousands of connections between potential disease-associated mutations, specific proteins, and medical conditions, thereby providing a detailed map for use by future researchers. They also supplied some examples in which they applied their approach to medical contexts as varied as connective tissue disorders, gallstones, and COVID-19 infections, sometimes even identifying single genes that play roles in multiple clinical scenarios. —YN

Affinity-based proteomics has enabled scalable quantification of thousands of protein targets in blood enhancing biomarker discovery, understanding of disease mechanisms, and genetic evaluation of drug targets in humans through protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs). Here, we integrate two partly complementary techniques—the aptamer-based SomaScan® v4 assay and the antibody-based Olink assays—to systematically assess phenotypic consequences of hundreds of pQTLs discovered for 871 protein targets across both platforms. We create a genetically anchored cross-platform proteome-phenome network comprising 547 protein–phenotype connections, 36.3% of which were only seen with one of the two platforms suggesting that both techniques capture distinct aspects of protein biology. We further highlight discordance of genetically predicted effect directions between assays, such as for PILRA and Alzheimer’s disease. Our results showcase the synergistic nature of these technologies to better understand and identify disease mechanisms and provide a benchmark for future cross-platform discoveries.

Discovery of protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs) has been enabled by affinity-based proteomic techniques and is increasingly used to guide genetically informed drug target evaluation. Large-scale proteomic data are now being created, but systematic, bidirectional assessment of platform differences is lacking, restricting clinical translation. We compared genetic, technical, and phenotypic determinants of 871 protein targets measured using both aptamer-(SomaScan® Platform v4) and antibody-based (Olink) assays in up to 10,708 individuals. Correlations coefficients for overlapping protein targets varied widely (median 0.38, IQR: 0.08-0.64). We found that 64% of pQTLs were shared across both platforms among all identified 608 cis- and 1,315 trans-pQTLs with sufficient power for replication, but with correlations of effect estimates being lower than previously reported (cis: 0.41, trans: 0.34). We identified technical, protein, and variant characteristics that contributed significantly to platform differences and found contradicting phenotypic associations attributable to those. We demonstrate how integrating phenomic and gene expression data improves genetic prioritisation strategies, including platform-specific pQTLs.

No abstract

Osteoarthritis is the most common musculoskeletal disease and the leading cause of disability globally. Here, we perform the largest genome-wide association study for osteoarthritis to date (77,052 cases and 378,169 controls), analysing 4 phenotypes: knee osteoarthritis, hip osteoarthritis, knee and/or hip osteoarthritis, and any osteoarthritis. We discover 64 signals, 52 of them novel, more than doubling the number of established disease loci. Six signals fine map to a single variant. We identify putative effector genes by integrating eQTL colocalization, finemapping, human rare disease, animal model, and osteoarthritis tissue expression data. We find enrichment for genes underlying monogenic forms of bone development diseases, and for the collagen formation and extracellular matrix organisation biological pathways. Ten of the likely effector genes, including TGFB1, FGF18, CTSK and IL11 have therapeutics approved or in clinical trials, with mechanisms of action supportive of evaluation for efficacy in osteoarthritis.Osteoarthritis affects 40% of individuals over the age of 70 1 , is a major cause of pain, comorbidity and mortality 2 . Ten million people in the UK alone suffer from osteoarthritis, with a total indirect cost to the economy of £14.8 billion per annum 2 . Disease management targets the main symptom (pain) and culminates in joint replacement surgery (1.76 million per year in the EU) with variable outcomes 3 . There is a clear and urgent need to translate genomic evidence into druggable DATA AVAILABILITY

Mosaic loss of chromosome Y (LOY) in leukocytes is the most common form of clonal mosaicism, caused by dysregulation in cell-cycle and DNA damage response pathways. Previous genetic studies have focussed on identifying common variants associated with LOY, which we now extend to rarer, protein-coding variation using exome sequences from 82,277 male UK Biobank participants. We find that loss of function of two genes—CHEK2 and GIGYF1—reach exome-wide significance. Rare alleles in GIGYF1 have not previously been implicated in any complex trait, but here loss-of-function carriers exhibit six-fold higher susceptibility to LOY (OR = 5.99 [3.04–11.81], p = 1.3 × 10−10). These same alleles are also associated with adverse metabolic health, including higher susceptibility to Type 2 Diabetes (OR = 6.10 [3.51–10.61], p = 1.8 × 10−12), 4 kg higher fat mass (p = 1.3 × 10−4), 2.32 nmol/L lower serum IGF1 levels (p = 1.5 × 10−4) and 4.5 kg lower handgrip strength (p = 4.7 × 10−7) consistent with proposed GIGYF1 enhancement of insulin and IGF-1 receptor signalling. These associations are mirrored by a common variant nearby associated with the expression of GIGYF1. Our observations highlight a potential direct connection between clonal mosaicism and metabolic health.

Context Biological and translational insights from large-scale, array-based genetic studies of fat distribution, a key determinant of metabolic health, have been limited by the difficulty in linking predominantly non-coding variants to specific gene targets. Rare coding variant analyses provide greater confidence that a specific gene is involved, but do not necessarily indicate whether gain or loss-of-function (LoF) would be of most therapeutic benefit. Objective, Design and Setting To identify genes/proteins involved in determining fat distribution, we combined the power of genome-wide analysis of array-based rare, non-synonymous variants in 450,562 individuals of UK Biobank with exome-sequence-based rare loss of function gene burden testing in 184,246 individuals. Results The data indicates that loss-of-function of four genes (PLIN1 [LoF variants, p=5.86×10 -7], INSR [LoF variants, p=6.21×10 -7], ACVR1C [LoF + Moderate impact variants, p=1.68×10 -7; Moderate impact variants, p=4.57×10 -7] and PDE3B [LoF variants, p=1.41×10 -6]) is associated with a beneficial impact on WHRadjBMI and increased gluteofemoral fat mass, whereas LoF of PLIN4 [LoF variants, p=5.86×10 -7] adversely affects these parameters. Phenotypic follow-up suggests that LoF of PLIN1, PDE3B and ACVR1C favourably affects metabolic phenotypes (e.g. triglyceride [TG] and HDL cholesterol concentrations) and reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease, whereas PLIN4 LoF has adverse health consequences. INSR LoF is associated with lower TG and HDL levels but may increase the risk of type 2 diabetes. Conclusion This study robustly implicates these genes in the regulation of fat distribution, providing new and in some cases somewhat counter-intuitive insight into the potential consequences of targeting these molecules therapeutically.