We assessed the role of habitat structure in the outcome of predation by measuring how aquatic vegetation influences predation rates of water bugs (Belostoma oxyurum (Dufour, 1863), Hemiptera, Belostomatidae) on tadpoles of Dendropsophus minutus (Peters, 1872) and Scinax curicica Pugliese, Pombal, and Sazima, 2004 (Anura, Hylidae). Considering that previous studies have shown that some tadpole species preferentially use microhabitats with aquatic vegetation at sites in southeastern Brazil, we hypothesized that these tadpoles may select such complex microhabitats because they can offer some protection against co-occurring predatory aquatic insects. We used field enclosures containing tadpoles of D. minutus and S. curicica and one predator (B. oxyurum), placed on natural substrata in sites both with and without aquatic vegetation, according to treatment. We measured the combined effects of predation and habitat structure on the survivorship of tadpoles, monitoring each enclosure daily during 10 days to survey surviving tadpoles. Treatments with predators reduced tadpole survivorship significantly in relation to controls for both tadpole species. The interaction between predator and vegetation was also significant, predation rates being lower when vegetation was present.

Microhabitat use is an important component of anuran behavior in both the tadpole and the adult stages. It is potentially influenced by phylogeny and extant ecological factors acting as selective pressures, such as predation, competition, or physical habitat properties. We aimed to test whether patterns of microhabitat use vary among species, habitats and sites, and how much of this variation can be explained by phylogenetic relatedness. We collected data on microhabitat use at five different sites, where we obtained a total of 4,230 records of individual tadpoles of 34 species in 15 genera and 7 families, and a total of 1,163 records of adult individuals of 39 species in 16 genera and 8 families. Mantel tests conducted to relate species dissimilarities in microhabitat use and phylogenetic relatedness indicated a weak but significant relationship for adult anurans, and no relationship for tadpoles. Our results suggest that microhabitat use is a plastic and variable trait, overcoming phylogenetic signal in tadpoles. In adult anurans, very little of the variation in microhabitat use can be explained by phylogenetic relatedness. Microhabitat use is not a good predictor of phylogeny, but it may be a very interesting subject to study natural selection and adaptation.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract