No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

This paper analyzes the first-order and first-order time-delayed systems control approaches, focusing mainly on unstable systems. First, it discusses asymmetries between the disturbance observer-based (DOB) control with decoupled tracking and the disturbance rejection responses, stressing applications to stable and unstable plants. The paper analyzes some DOB-based control solutions for unstable systems which do not use internal closed-loop stabilization. The novelty of the paper is thorough study accompanied with a comprehensive explanation of the differences between two distinct approaches: the transfer-function- and the closed-loop-based feedforward control approach from the point of view of control constraints. It is clearly illustrated that the main cause of instability of DOB-based approaches, applied to unstable systems, is given by their effort to impose on the system the unstable dynamics of the chosen nominal process model. It is also shown that the closed-loop stability of the DOB-based control, applied to the unstable systems, can be restored by using the supervising reference model control (RMC). The main novelty of the proposed approach is that its eliminates the mentioned stability problems while maintaining the full functionality of the chosen control structures. RMC has so far only been implemented for generating a setpoint feedforward signal. However, by generalization of this approach for disturbance rejection, the methodology of DOB design, based on nominal models, can be extended to the control of unstable systems. Without the use of disturbance reference models, the interactions of the master stabilizer with disturbance compensation cannot be eliminated. Without the internal stabilization, the stable transients can only be achieved by designing controllers based on stable models, instead of unstable ones. The existing modifications of DOB-based schemes for unstable plants, proposed in some references, are shown to lead to traditional Proportional-Integrative (PI) control, thus losing all the advantages over the PI controllers. In all the considered structures, the role of integrating models is also emphasized.

This article presents design and evaluation of filtered proportional-integral controllers and filtered Smith predictorinspired constrained dead time compensators. Both are based on the integral plus dead time and on the first-order time delayed plant models. They are compared as for tuning simplicity, robustness and noise attenuation. Such a comparison, which presents a robustness test regarding the importance of the internal plant feedback approximation, may be carried out by performance measures built on deviations of the input and output transient responses from their ideal shapes. When combined with integral of absolute error measures of both solution types with the disturbance responses set as nearly equivalent, we can see that the filtered Smith predictor setpoint responses may be significantly faster than the filtered proportional-integral controller responses, more robust and, using higher-order filters, also sufficiently smooth. Furthermore, tuning of the possibly higher-order filters for filtered Smith predictor is simpler. Its overall design is more transparent and straightforward with respect to the control constraints, where the filtered Smith predictor requires some additional anti-windup measures.

No abstract

No abstract