2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1474-6670(17)34642-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Tracking Performance on Disturbance-Rejection Controllers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…OMM achieves feasibility of the requirement (3) such that the transferred spectrum is limited within the interval and equality is assumed only in the steady state, that means (4) If we want to design an appropriate 2DoF control system based on (2), we have to modify using onto the . In [1], (3) and (4) are used not only to achieve the perfect results for the control signal but also to reject disturbance. In [3] and [4], OMM is applied to plants with time delays or astatism.…”
Section: Common Properties Of Modulus Optimum Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…OMM achieves feasibility of the requirement (3) such that the transferred spectrum is limited within the interval and equality is assumed only in the steady state, that means (4) If we want to design an appropriate 2DoF control system based on (2), we have to modify using onto the . In [1], (3) and (4) are used not only to achieve the perfect results for the control signal but also to reject disturbance. In [3] and [4], OMM is applied to plants with time delays or astatism.…”
Section: Common Properties Of Modulus Optimum Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [3] and [4], OMM is applied to plants with time delays or astatism. In [1] the importance of the is not mentioned. Next, we will compare the solution using a (1) and using modification of the OMM.…”
Section: Common Properties Of Modulus Optimum Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations