ObjectivesWe identified factors associated with thromboembolic and bleeding events in two contemporary cohorts of anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), treated with either vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs).DesignProspective, multicentre observational study.Setting461 centres in seven European countries.Participants5310 patients receiving a VKA (PREvention oF thromboembolic events - European Registry in Atrial Fibrillation (PREFER in AF), derivation cohort) and 3156 patients receiving a NOAC (PREFER in AF Prolongation, validation cohort) for stroke prevention in AF.Outcome measuresRisk factors for thromboembolic events (ischaemic stroke, systemic embolism) and major bleeding (gastrointestinal bleeding, intracerebral haemorrhage and other life-threatening bleeding).ResultsThe mean age of patients enrolled in the PREFER in AF registry was 72±10 years, 40% were female and the mean CHA2DS2-VASc Score was 3.5±1.7. The incidence of thromboembolic and major bleeding events was 2.34% (95% CI 1.93% to 2.74%) and 2.84% (95% CI 2.41% to 3.33%) after 1-year of follow-up, respectively.Abnormal liver function, prior stroke or transient ischaemic attack, labile international normalised ratio (INR), concomitant therapy with antiplatelet or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, heart failure and older age (≥75 years) were independently associated with both thromboembolic and major bleeding events.With the exception of unstable INR values, these risk factors were validated in patients treated with NOACs (PREFER in AF Prolongation Study, 72±9 years, 40% female, CHA2DS2-VASc 3.3±1.6). For each single point decrease on a modifiable bleeding risk scale we observed a 30% lower risk for major bleeding events (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.76, p<0.01) and a 28% lower rate of thromboembolic events (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.82, p<0.01).ConclusionAttending to modifiable risk factors is an important treatment target in anticoagulated AF patients to reduce thromboembolic and bleeding events. Initiation of anticoagulation in those at risk of stroke should not be prevented by elevated bleeding risk scores.

No abstract

Using the 4th quartile of plasma osmolality at admission as a natural cut-off point, osmolality in Q4, as compared to Q1-3, was significantly predictive of short term but not long-term outcome in ACS patients undergoing coronary stenting. Our data suggest osmolality to be an independent, feasible, and cost-effective tool for rapid risk stratification in ACS patients.

In this all-comers study of STEMI patients in the VIENNA STEMI network, cardiogenic shock was the strongest predictor of short patient-related delays, whereas a history of diabetes and female sex were independent associated with late diagnosis in STEMI. After adjustment for clinical confounders, patient related delay did not significantly impact on long-term all-cause mortality.

Background: Increased platelet turnover and high platelet reactivity are associated with short-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or stable coronary artery disease (SCAD). We investigated the impact of platelet turnover on long-term MACE. Methods: Consecutive patients presenting with ACS or SCAD undergoing PCI between 2009 and 2010 were included. All patients received clopidogrel and aspirin as dual antithrombotic therapy regimen. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were applied to assess the prognostic impact of platelet turnover (reticulated platelet count [RPC], mean platelet volume [MPV]) and function on long-term MACE, a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and nonfatal stroke. Results: In total, 477 patients were eligible. Mean age was 64.3 ± 12.7 years, 68.8% were male. Median follow-up was 5.8 (IQR 4.2-6.5) years. Median RPC was 7.6 (IQR 5.6-10.4) g/L and median MPV was 10.7 (IQR 10.1-11.3) fL. In univariable analysis, RPC was associated with MACE, both as continuous (HR 1.064 [95%CI 1.021-1.111]; P = .006) and dichotomized (HR 1.693 [95%CI 1.156-2.481]; P = .006) variable. After adjustment, continuous RPC (HR 1.055 [95%CI 1.012-1.099]; P = .010) and dichotomized RPC (HR 1.716 [95%CI 1.152-2.559]; P = .007) remained significantly associated with MACE. Neither MPV nor platelet function testing was associated with long-term adverse outcome.

BACKGROUND: The risks of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events in patients with atrial fibrillation both increase with age; therefore, net clinical benefit analyses of anticoagulant treatments in the elderly population are crucial to guide treatment. We evaluated the 1-year clinical outcomes with non-vitamin-K antagonist and vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs vs VKAs) in elderly (≥75 years) patients with atrial fibrillation in a prospective registry setting. METHODS: Data on 3825 elderly patients were pooled from the PREFER in AF and PREFER in AF PRO-LONGATION registries. The primary outcome was the incidence of the net composite endpoint, including major bleeding and ischemic cardiovascular events on NOACs (n = 1556) compared with VKAs (n = 2269). RESULTS: The rates of the net composite endpoint were 6.6%/year with NOACs vs 9.1%/year with VKAs (odds ratio [OR] 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-0.99; P = .042). NOAC therapy was associated with a lower rate of major bleeding compared with VKA use (OR 0.58; 95% CI, 0.38-0.90; P = .013). Ischemic events were nominally reduced too (OR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-1.00; P = .050). Major bleeding with NOACs was numerically lower in higher-risk patients with low body mass index (BMI; OR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.22-1.12; P = .07) or with age ≥85 years (OR 0.44; 95% CI, 0.13-1.49; P = .17). CONCLUSIONS: Our real-world data indicate that, compared with VKAs, NOAC use is associated with a better net clinical benefit in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation, primarily due to lower rates of major bleeding. Major bleeding with NOACs was numerically lower also in higher-risk patients with low BMI or age ≥85 years.

No abstract

Our study in predominantly anticoagulated patients with AF shows that, reduction in LVEF is associated with higher thromboembolic, but not higher bleeding risk. HFHpEF is a distinct and puzzling group, featuring the highest CHADS-VASc score but the lowest residual risk of thromboembolic events, which warrants further investigation.