Compared to an office-based case-finding strategy, the two-step systematic screening strategy had no overall effect on fracture incidence. The two-step strategy seemed, however, to be beneficial in the group of women who were identified by FRAX as moderate- or high-risk patients and complied with DXA.

No abstract

Locally derived reference values are important to avoid false positive or false negative findings during work-up in patients evaluated for osteoporosis.

BackgroundHip fractures incur the greatest medical costs of any fracture. Valid epidemiological data are important to monitor for time-dependent changes. In Norway, hip fractures are registered in the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR), but no published national validation exists. The aim of the present study was a national validation of NPR as a register for hip fractures using diagnostic codes (ICD-10 S 72.0-2) and/or procedure codes (NOMESCO version 1.14 NFBxy (x = 0-9, y = 0-2) or NFJxy (x = 0-9, y = 0-2).MethodA nationwide, population-based cohort comprising a random sub-sample of 1,000 hip fracture-related entries for the years 2008–09 was drawn from the NPR. 200 entries were defined by a combination of diagnostic and procedure codes (subsample 1), 400 entries were defined by diagnostic codes only (subsample 2) and 400 entries were defined by procedure codes only (subsample 3). Accuracy was ascertained through comparison with discharge summaries, procedure notes and X-ray reports requested from 40 health institutions. Comparisons between groups were done by chi2 for categorical and t-test for continuous variables.Results792 health records from 32 institutions were reviewed. High accuracy (98.2%, 95% C.I. 96.5-99.9%) was found for subsample 1, a combination of diagnostic and procedure codes. Coding errors were prominent in other subsamples. Defining fractures by a combination of diagnostic and procedure codes, annual average hip fracture incidence in Norway was 9,092 (95% C.I. 8,934 -9,249), excluding only 6.5% of all hip fractures defined by wider definitions.ConclusionsBased on current coding practice in Norway, a reliable national estimate of hip fracture incidences is found by a combination of relevant ICD-10 and NOMESCO codes in the NPR. This method may be used for monitoring epidemiological changes.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-372) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

osteoporosis and VFxs are prevalent in men aged 60-74 years. Although the majority of deformities were present in individuals without osteoporosis, BMD was lower in patients with VFxs at all sites investigated. Male osteoporosis was markedly underdiagnosed.

Extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) are seen in 50-75% of patients treated with typical antipsychotics and are a cause of treatment failure in at least 30% of the patients. Using atypical antipsychotics, the EPS incidence is lower, but a low-dosage strategy using typical antipsychotics is also known to cause fewer EPS. What conclusions can be drawn for the daily clinical practice? A naturalistic study including all schizophrenic inpatients in a psychiatric ward (n=123) analysed the effects of treatment concerning positive/negative symptoms, EPS, number of days to re-hospitalization and inpatient-days in the year after baseline admittance, using atypical and typical antipsychotics as recommended by the Danish Society of Psychiatry. The incidence of EPS was significantly higher in patients who were treated with typical antipsychotics in relation to atypical antipsychotics (46% vs. 12%, P<0.001). Patients with EPS had significantly more negative symptoms and a poorer level of function at discharge. Nevertheless, no difference regarding re-hospitalization and inpatient-days was found, whether the patient was treated with typical or atypical antipsychotics. However, it is important to underline that patients treated with atypical oral antipsychotic do as well as patients on typical depot antipsychotics.

The risk-stratified osteoporosis strategy evaluation study (ROSE) is a randomized prospective population-based study investigating the effectiveness of a two-step screening program for osteoporosis in women. This paper reports the study design and baseline characteristics of the study population. 35,000 women aged 65-80 years were selected at random from the population in the Region of Southern Denmark and-before inclusion-randomized to either a screening group or a control group. As first step, a self-administered questionnaire regarding risk factors for osteoporosis based on FRAX(®) was issued to both groups. As second step, subjects in the screening group with a 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures ≥15% were offered a DXA scan. Patients diagnosed with osteoporosis from the DXA scan were advised to see their GP and discuss pharmaceutical treatment according to Danish National guidelines. The primary outcome is incident clinical fractures as evaluated through annual follow-up using the Danish National Patient Registry. The secondary outcomes are cost-effectiveness, participation rate, and patient preferences. 20,904 (60%) women participated and included in the baseline analyses (10,411 in screening and 10,949 in control group). The mean age was 71 years. As expected by randomization, the screening and control groups had similar baseline characteristics. Screening for osteoporosis is at present not evidence based according to the WHO screening criteria. The ROSE study is expected to provide knowledge of the effectiveness of a screening strategy that may be implemented in health care systems to prevent fractures.

There is a need of studies exploring the link between socioeconomic status and DXA scans and osteoporotic fracture, which was the aim of present study. No differences in socioeconomic status and risk of osteoporotic fractures was found. However, women with further/higher education and higher income are more often DXA-scanned.