757 Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common leukemia seen in adults. Previous population-based research in CLL has not represented the current ethnic makeup and diversity within the US population. We undertook a large Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) based analysis to assess disparities in outcome among different ethnic subgroups of CLL patients, so that therapeutic resources can be utilized effectively. Methods: The SEER-18 Registry (1973–2009) was used to retrieve a population of 60,293 patients with established diagnosis of CLL (Histology code: 9823). The cohort was restricted to adults (>18 yrs) diagnosed after January 1, 1992, since ethnic minorities were underrepresented in SEER prior to that. Cases reported in death certificate/autopsy, those without a confirmatory diagnosis, those with ethnicity recorded as unknown/other or those that did not have follow up post diagnosis were excluded. Using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for confounding variables, association between patient characteristics and survival (overall; OS and CLL-specific; CLLSS) was evaluated. Analysis was performed utilizing the SAS software (v9.2). All statistical tests were two-sided with a significance level of 5%. Results: A total of 37,834 patients (22,581 males; 60%, 15,253 females; 40%) were included in the final analysis. Age group (yr) cohorts included: 18–44 (861; 2%) 45–54 (3,587; 9%), 55–64 (7,684; 20%), 65–74 (10,966; 29%), and ≥75 (14,736; 39%). For survival trends over time, stratification by year of diagnosis was used: 1992–1999 (9,837; 26%), 2000–2004 (14,129; 37%), 2005–2009 (13,868; 37%). Stratification by race/ethnicity included: White (32,980; 87%), African-American (AA: 2,486; 7%), Hispanic (1,536; 4%), Asian (737; 2%), and Native American (NA: 95; 0.25%). Median age ranged from 68 yr (AA and Asian) to 71 yr (Whites) (Figure 1). For survival analysis, NA ethnic group was excluded due to their small numbers. Females had a significantly better median OS (8.3 yr vs. 6.4 yr; p<0.001) as well as CLLSS (p<0.001) than males, when evaluated for the whole population and across different age groups. Both, OS and CLLSS progressively and significantly (p<0.001) declined with advancing age. Progressive significant improvement was seen in OS over time across cohorts by year of diagnosis (6.3 yr, 7.3 yr, 7.4 yr; p<0.001). This improvement in OS persisted over time for age groups <75 yr, but for ≥75 yr, the improvement was lost in the most recent time period cohort (2005–2009). The percentage of patients dying of CLL has decreased progressively over time suggesting an improvement in therapy. Among various ethnicities, Asians had the best (7.5 yr) and AA had the worst (4.8 yr) OS (p=0.006) (Figure 2) and CLLSS (p<0.001). In a multivariate model, AA continued to have the worst OS across all age groups (p<0.001), while Whites had the best OS in age groups <75 yr and Asians had the best among patients ≥75 yrs. Percentage of patients dying from CLL was highest in AA across age groups, but lowest for Whites in age groups <75 yr, while in Hispanics in patients ≥75 yr. Trends in CLLSS were noted to be more heterogeneous among ethnicities than trends in OS. Conclusions: This report presents the largest population-based analysis of patient characteristics including ethnicity and survival in CLL in the era of novel therapeutic agents. Older patients had worse OS among all ethnic subgroups. Progressive improvement in CLLSS was noted over time suggesting a possible impact of new therapeutics, however this was not seen in ≥75 yr patients. AA patients had the worst OS among all ethnicities and age groups. This survival difference was most significant and pronounced in younger patients, which has important implications. For example, this survival disadvantage may represent poor access to optimal healthcare warranting development of new initiatives directed towards this ethnic minority. On the other hand discrete biological variants may underlie the more aggressive disease biology in younger AA patients underscoring the need to further investigate and delineate the molecular biology of CLL in ethnic minorities. Studies of outcome disparities are important not only for evaluating disease characteristics but also management needs of specific patient populations and are critical for designing programs to deliver optimal healthcare to ethnically diverse populations. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sorafenib is an oral multiple kinase inhibitor that blocks Raf, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor. It has been approved in the US and Europe for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Sorafenib has demonstrated a 44% increase in survival for advanced HCC patients, compared with best supportive care alone. We have reviewed the pharmacology, pivotal studies, and safety data for this agent. Sorafenib is the first systemic drug demonstrating a significant survival benefit, and is the standard of care for patients with advanced HCC for whom no potential curative option is available.

BACKGROUND Squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide. Inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling has been shown to be a critical component of therapeutic option. Herein, we report a case of durable complete response to erlotinib. CASE SUMMARY An 81-year-old Caucasian male who presented with metastatic poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma of right cervical lymph nodes (levels 2 and 3). Imaging studies including (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT) and contrast-enhanced CT scan of neck and chest did not reveal any other disease elsewhere. Panendoscopic examination with random biopsy did not reveal malignant lesion in nasopharynx, oropharynx, and larynx. He underwent modified neck dissection and postoperative radiation. Within 2 mo after completion of radiation, he developed local recurrence at right neck, which was surgically removed. Two mo after the salvage surgery, he developed a second recurrence at right neck. Due to suboptimal performance status and his preference, he started erlotinib treatment. He achieved partial response after first 2 mo of erlotinib treatment, then complete response after total 6 mo of erlotinib treatment. He developed sever skin rash and diarrhea including Clostridium difficile infection during the course of erlotinib treatment requiring dose reduction and eventual discontinuation. He remained in complete remission for more than two years after discontinuation of erlotinib. CONCLUSION We report a case of metastatic SCCHN achieving durable complete response from erlotinib. Patient experienced skin rash and diarrhea toxicities which were likely predictors of his treatment response.

Objective: Rare disease Background: Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a rare, aggressive head and neck cancer with frequent metastases. Current treatment options for recurrent or metastatic SDC include targeted anti-androgen therapy, HER2-targeted therapy, or systemic chemotherapy. We report the first use of a combination chemohormonal strategy. Case Report: A 68-year-old male who had never smoked with a past medical history of two-vessel coronary artery disease and systolic heart failure presented with a parotid mass and underwent surgical resection. Biopsy of the mass revealed high-grade, androgen receptor-positive and Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase-2 (ERBB2)-amplified positive SDC. He subsequently received adjuvant radiation therapy. Four months after completion of adjuvant radiation therapy, recurrence with symptomatic pleural effusion and nodes, hepatic metastases, and boney metastases occurred. Due to significant symptomatic tumor, a rapid treatment response was desired. Combination chemohormonal therapy (CHT) was initiated with carboplatin area under the curve 4 and paclitaxel, 200 mg/m 2 in 21day cycles along with combined androgen blockade using leuprolide, 45 mg subcutaneously every 6 months and bicalutamide, 50 mg daily. The treatment was well tolerated with fatigue as the main adverse event. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography at 3 and 6 months after treatment initiation showed good partial response. The patient experienced uveal progression after 8 months and alternate treatment was started. Conclusions: Combination CHT with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and combined androgen deprivation may be a good treatment option in androgen receptor-positive recurrent or metastatic SDC if rapid treatment response is desired. Combination chemotherapy with androgen deprivation for validation through clinical trials.

No abstract