The billbug, Sphenophorus spp. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), is an important pest complex in sod farms in Georgia. Larval feeding within stolons and on roots affects spring recovery of slow-growing zoysiagrass and poses a serious challenge to machine harvesting, as the damaged turfgrass rarely holds together. Little is known about major billbug species and their seasonal occurrence and abundance in Georgia sod farms, as most previous research was conducted in golf courses in the region. In 2018 and 2019, adult billbugs were sampled from five zoysiagrass sod field sites in central Georgia. Four linear pitfall traps were used per site from February to December each year, and the traps were checked at weekly intervals. The data show that >98% of the sampled billbugs were the hunting billbug, Sphenophorus venatus vestitus Chittenden, whereas the nutgrass billbug, Sphenophorus cariosus Olivier; uneven billbug, Sphenophorus inaequalis Say; and vegetable weevil, Listroderes difficilis Germain were the minor species. Seasonal billbug capture was influenced by turfgrass phenology (e.g., early-growth-stage, late-growth-stage or fully grown turfgrass). The numbers of Sphenophorus spp. collected were significantly greater in the fully grown turfgrass than in the early- or late-growth-stage turfgrasses. Significantly greater densities of billbug were found in Zoysia matrella (L.) Merrill (‘Zeon’) and the Z. matrella × Zoysia pacifica (Goudswaard) M. Hotta & S. Kuroki hybrid (‘Emerald’) than in the Zoysia japonica (Steudel) cultivars ‘El Toro’ and ‘Zenith’. Similar numbers of male and female billbugs were collected from the sod field sites.
The hunting billbug, Sphenophorus venatus vestitus Chittenden (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), is an important turfgrass pest, especially in sod farms. S. venatus vestitus larvae feed on the stems and roots of turfgrass. Damaged turfgrass is loosely held together and poses a challenge for machine harvesting. Additionally, the normal growth of turfgrass is affected, especially after winter dormancy. Because S. venatus vestitus larvae are hidden inside the stems or under the soil, larval management is challenging. To improve sampling and management, the spatial distribution patterns of S. venatus vestitus larvae and adults were assessed at four sod farm sites with a history of S. venatus vestitus infestation in central Georgia (USA). The larvae were sampled by soil cores using a hole cutter, whereas adults were collected using pitfall traps for 7 d. The spatial distributions of larvae and adults was analyzed using SADIE and variograms. The SADIE and variogram analyses revealed a significant aggregation pattern for adults, whereas aggregated distributions were detected for larvae with variogram analyses. The average ranges of spatial dependence for larval and adult samples were 3.9 m and 5.4 m, respectively. Interpolated distribution maps were created to visually depict S. venatus vestitus infestation hotspots within the sod farms.
Because turfgrass is maintained in various settings, such as golf courses, lawns, and commercially grown in sod farms, it is critical to understand its major insect pests and management practices. A survey was conducted to determine the major insect pests and current management practices in the commercial turfgrass industries in Georgia. A total of 32 respondents representing golf courses and sod farms participated in the survey. A significantly greater number of respondents represented golf courses (75% of 32 respondents) than sod farms (25%). The respondents (n =31) identified fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda J.E. Smith (32.5%), white grubs, Phyllophaga spp. (20.8%), mole crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae; 16.9%), and others (22%) as major pests in comparison to billbugs, Sphenophorus spp. (7.8%) and chinch bugs, Blissus spp. (0%). Of 31 respondents, 64.5% applied insecticides two to five times and 22.5% respondents applied insecticides 5–10 times for insect management each year. Among nonchemical tools (n=24), most respondents opted to do nothing (70.8%) than use biological control (0%), host plant resistance (25%), or other management tools (4.2%).
The strawberry crop endures economic losses due to feeding injury from a number of phytophagous arthropod pests. A number of invasive pests have posed challenges to crop protection techniques in the strawberry cropping system recently. It is increasingly evident that sole reliance on chemical control options is not sustainable. In this review, current challenges and advances in integrated pest management of various strawberry pests are presented. Key pests discussed include thrips, mites, lygus bug, spotted wing drosophila, seed bug, weevils, aphids, whiteflies, and armyworms. Several integrated pest management techniques that include use of intercropping, resistant cultivars, irradiation with gamma rays, use of spectral sensitivity of pests, biological control agents and natural enemies, and biorational pesticides have recently been reported to be useful in managing the various strawberry pests. With the increase in world production of strawberry, several techniques will be necessary to manage the pest complex of strawberry.
The billbug complex, Sphenophorus spp. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), is an important pest on the sod farms of Georgia. The feeding damage of larvae within stolons and on roots delays the sod harvest and makes it difficult to conduct machine harvests. To develop an effective management strategy, the timing of insecticide applications is critical. The activity of billbugs, especially soon after sod harvest, has not been documented, as newly emerging adults could reinfest the harvested area or adjacent nonharvested sod fields. In 2019 and 2020, adult billbugs were sampled from harvested and nonharvested areas of sod farms by using linear pitfall traps. Although a significantly greater number of billbug adults were captured from the nonharvested sod, the data showed that adults were present in the harvested sod area. To understand the direction of billbug movement in harvested and nonharvested sod, a square area was selected, and the sod inside the square was removed. Linear pitfall traps were deployed along the perimeter of square areas to collect adults from outside and inside the square. In 2020, a significantly greater number of billbug adults were collected in the traps from the nonharvested areas outside the square than from harvested area inside the square, whereas in 2019, adult captures were similar from both areas. The data documented the activity of billbugs in the areas where sod was harvested, posing a risk of infestation for both strips of nonharvested grass in the harvested area and the adjacent, nonharvested sod fields that were near harvest.
Objective: Glutathione supplement has been prescribed as a therapy in autism often without proper glutathione quantification in the body. Though, increased speech and increased imaginary play is reported, increased screaming and loosening of stools have been reported as side effects. In this scenario, for an effective management of glutathione administration, we suggest a simple and reliable means of glutathione quantification before its administration. This study pertains to the quantification of total glutathione in autistic children using noninvasively taken urine as sample. Materials & Methods: Urine samples were collected from ten autistic and nine neurotypical children of similar age and sex. Total glutathione was quantified using enzymatic recycling method. Results: Mean levels of total glutathione in autistic children were significantly lower than the neurotypical children (p-value <0.001). Conclusion: We conclude that total glutathione is lower in autistic children and noninvasively collected urine can be used for glutathione quantification before administering glutathione as a therapeutic measure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.