This review focuses on the heart and vascular system in patients with Down syndrome. A clear knowledge on the wide spectrum of various abnormalities associated with this syndrome is essential for skillful management of cardiac problems in patients with Down syndrome. Epidemiology of congenital heart defects, cardiovascular aspects and thyroid-related cardiac impairment in patients with Down syndrome will be discussed.

BackgroundThe method used to delineate the boundary of the right ventricle (RV), relative to the trabeculations and papillary muscles in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) ventricular volume analysis, may matter more when these structures are hypertrophied than in individuals with normal cardiovascular anatomy. This study aimed to compare two methods of cavity delineation in patients with systemic RV.MethodsTwenty-nine patients (mean age 34.7 ± 12.4 years) with a systemic RV (12 with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) and 17 with atrially switched (TGA) underwent CMR. We compared measurements of systemic RV volumes and function using two analysis protocols. The RV trabeculations and papillary muscles were either included in the calculated blood volume, the boundary drawn immediately within the apparently compacted myocardial layer, or they were manually outlined and excluded. RV stroke volume (SV) calculated using each method was compared with corresponding left ventricular (LV) SV. Additionally, we compared the differences in analysis time, and in intra- and inter-observer variability between the two methods. Paired samples t-test was used to test for differences in volumes, function and analysis time between the two methods. Differences in intra- and inter-observer reproducibility were tested using an extension of the Bland-Altman method.ResultsThe inclusion of trabeculations and papillary muscles in the ventricular volume resulted in higher values for systemic RV end diastolic volume (mean difference 28.7 ± 10.6 ml, p < 0.001) and for end systolic volume (mean difference 31.0 ± 11.5 ml, p < 0.001). Values for ejection fraction were significantly lower (mean difference -7.4 ± 3.9%, p < 0.001) if structures were included. LV SV did not differ significantly from RV SV for both analysis methods (p = NS). Including structures resulted in shorter analysis time (p < 0.001), and showed better inter-observer reproducibility for ejection fraction (p < 0.01).ConclusionThe choice of method for systemic RV cavity delineation significantly affected volume measurements, given the CMR acquisition and analysis systems used. We recommend delineation outside the trabeculations for routine clinical measurements of systemic RV volumes as this approach took less time and gave more reproducible measurements.

The study was registered at http://trialregister.nl. Identifier: NTR1909.).

In TOF patients who had undergone PVR, the best preoperative threshold to achieve mid-to-late RV normalization was RV ESV < 80 mL/m(2). Patients with preoperative RV ESV > 95 mL/m(2) were at increased risk for suboptimal haemodynamic outcome and adverse clinical events. Our findings may assist in timing of PVR.

Background-In patients with a right ventricle (RV) in the systemic position, tricuspid valve surgery for regurgitation beyond adolescence is a subject of debate. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the complications, survival, and benefit of tricuspid surgery in adult patients with an atrium-level correction for transposition of the great arteries or congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Methods and Results-All adult patients (nϭ16; 7 men, 9 women; age 35Ϯ11 years) who underwent tricuspid valvuloplasty (nϭ8) or replacement (nϭ8) in the period 1999 to 2008 were included. Complications and survival were analyzed, and postoperative changes in RV function and functional class were evaluated. Tricuspid regurgitation was graded 1 to 4 according to its severity, RV dysfunction was graded as 1 to 4 (1ϭno dysfunction to 4ϭsevere dysfunction), and functional status was determined according to New York Heart Association class. Although complications occurred in 11 patients, all could be managed adequately. Three patients died 109, 180, and 659 days after surgery, respectively, the first patient after tricuspid valve replacement and the latter 2 after tricuspid valvuloplasty. Overall, tricuspid valve function improved (from grade 3.1Ϯ0.8 to 0.9Ϯ1.0; Pϭ0.001) and functional class improved (from 2.7Ϯ0.6 to 2.1Ϯ0.8; Pϭ0.007), whereas RV function remained unchanged. After tricuspid valvuloplasty, however, recurrent moderate tricuspid valve regurgitation was observed frequently (nϭ3; 37%). Conclusions-Mortality is rather low after tricuspid surgery in adult patients with mild to moderate RV dysfunction. In general, tricuspid valve function and functional class improve significantly after surgery, and systemic RV function is preserved. Tricuspid valvuloplasty, however, is associated with a high rate of recurrence of regurgitation.

Editorial see p 314 Clinical Perspective on p 330In both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with systemic left ventricular dysfunction, inhibition of the reninangiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) decreases both Background-The role of angiotensin II receptor blockers in patients with a systemic right ventricle has not been elucidated. Methods and Results-We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, parallel, randomized controlled trial of angiotensin II receptor blocker valsartan 160 mg twice daily compared with placebo in patients with a systemic right ventricle caused by congenitally or surgically corrected transposition of the great arteries. The primary end point was change in right ventricular ejection fraction during 3-year follow-up, determined by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging or, in patients with contraindication for magnetic resonance imaging, multirow detector computed tomography. Secondary end points were change in right ventricular volumes and mass, V · o 2 peak, and quality of life. Primary analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. A total of 88 patients (valsartan, n=44; placebo, n=44) were enrolled in the trial. No serious adverse effects occurred in either group. There was no significant effect of 3-year valsartan therapy on systemic right ventricular ejection fraction (treatment effect, 1.3%; 95% confidence interval, −1.3% to 3.9%; P=0.34), maximum exercise capacity, or quality of life. There was a larger increase in right ventricular end-diastolic volume (15 mL; 95% confidence interval, 3-28 mL; P<0.01) and mass (8 g; 95% confidence interval, 2-14 g; P=0.01) in the placebo group than in the valsartan group. Conclusions-There was no significant treatment effect of valsartan on right ventricular ejection fraction, exercise capacity, or quality of life. Valsartan was associated with a similar frequency of significant clinical events as placebo. Small but significant differences between valsartan and placebo were present for change in right ventricular volumes and mass. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN52352170. 17,20,21 In asymptomatic patients, on the other hand, there was no effect on ventricular function, and the effect on ventricular remodeling was much less pronounced. [22][23][24] In patients with a systemic right ventricle, the role of pharmacological RAAS blockade has not been established. Because angiotensin II receptor density is similar in both the left and right ventricles, and neurohormonal activity is similar to that observed in patients with stable heart failure, one would expect a similar effect.25-27 However, in 2 small placebo-controlled trials (n=17 and n=29, respectively), RAAS inhibition had no beneficial effect on exercise capacity, right ventricular function, or remodeling. 28,29 These studies, on the other hand, had only short-term follow-up and low patient numbers. Moreover, predominantly asymptomatic patients were included. Results from retrospective and single-arm studies have been eq...

No abstract

No abstract