Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a complex and heterogeneous autoimmune disease, represents a significant challenge for both diagnosis and treatment. Patients with SLE in Latin America face special problems that should be considered when therapeutic guidelines are developed. The objective of the study is to develop clinical practice guidelines for Latin American patients with lupus. Two independent teams (rheumatologists with experience in lupus management and methodologists) had an initial meeting in Panama City, Panama, in April 2016. They selected a list of questions for the clinical problems most commonly seen in Latin American patients with SLE. These were addressed with the best available evidence and summarised in a standardised format following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. All preliminary findings were discussed in a second face-to-face meeting in Washington, DC, in November 2016. As a result, nine organ/system sections are presented with the main findings; an ‘overarching’ treatment approach was added. Special emphasis was made on regional implementation issues. Best pharmacologic options were examined for musculoskeletal, mucocutaneous, kidney, cardiac, pulmonary, neuropsychiatric, haematological manifestations and the antiphospholipid syndrome. The roles of main therapeutic options (ie, glucocorticoids, antimalarials, immunosuppressant agents, therapeutic plasma exchange, belimumab, rituximab, abatacept, low-dose aspirin and anticoagulants) were summarised in each section. In all cases, benefits and harms, certainty of the evidence, values and preferences, feasibility, acceptability and equity issues were considered to produce a recommendation with special focus on ethnic and socioeconomic aspects. Guidelines for Latin American patients with lupus have been developed and could be used in similar settings.

ObjectiveTwo recent important lupus nephritis trials reported that proteinuria was a good predictor of renal outcome in Caucasians, but data on real-life situation, other races and severe nephritis are lacking to substantiate this finding as a simple test to guide clinical practice. The aim of this study was to validate proteinuria as a predictor of long-term renal outcome in real-life situation in a racially diverse group of patients with severe nephritis.MethodsProteinuria, serum creatinine (SCr) and urine red blood cells were assessed at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months, as early predictors of long-term renal outcome (SCr <1.5 mg/dL at 7 years), in 94 patients with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis. The parameter performance and cut-off values were computed by receiver operating characteristic curves. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to validate the parameter.ResultsA proteinuria <0.8 g/24 hours at 12 months was the best single predictor of long-term renal outcome (sensitivity 90%, specificity 78%, positive predictive value 67%, negative predictive value (NPV) 94% and area under the curve 0.86; p<0.001). Addition of other variables to proteinuria such as SCr and haematuria at 12 months did not improve its performance. The proteinuria cut-off value of 0.8 g/24 hours at 12 months was a good predictor of 7-year renal survival (years free of dialysis) for patients with pure membranous (p=0.005) and proliferative nephritis (p=0.043), as well as black (p=0.002) and white race (p=0.001), anti-dsDNA positive (p=0.001) and anti-dsDNA negative (p=0.04) and male (p=0.028) and female (p=0.003) patients.ConclusionWe provided novel evidence that, in a real-life situation, proteinuria at 12 months of follow-up was the single best predictor of renal outcome at 7 years for an ethnically diverse group of patients with severe nephritis and a valid parameter for distinct histological classes, races, genders and anti-dsDNA profiles. The remarkably high NPV obtained reinforces its recommendation as the ideal predictor for clinical practice, since it is of low cost, easy to interpret, non-invasive and widely available.

Background/Purpose Lupus nephritis (LN) usually develops within the first years of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) onset and rarely after that. There are scarce studies comparing early- versus late-onset nephritis (before versus after five years of SLE diagnosis). The aim of this study was to compare the severity and long-term outcome (after 7 years) in these two, late-onset and early-onset, nephritis groups. Methods This study included 93 patients from rheumatology tertiary centers from Brazil and Italy, all of them with biopsy-proven LN with > 7 years follow-up. Patients were divided in two groups: early-onset nephritis ( n = 75) and late-onset nephritis ( n = 18). Clinical and laboratorial data were obtained using a standardized electronic chart database protocol carried out at 1–6 months interval and established in 2000. Patients >50 years or with concomitant autoimmune diseases were excluded. Variables evaluated at the LN presentation were Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), creatinine, albumin, anti-DNA positivity and nephritis class. Variables evaluated at the long-term outcome (after 7 years) were Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Damage Index (SDI), creatinine, dialysis and mortality. Results The average time of LN presentation was 10.94 ± 3.73 years for the late-onset and 1.20 ± 1.60 years for the early-onset group. Their similar nephritis duration (12.44 ± 3.2 versus 13.28 ± 4.03 years, p = 0.41) and comparable mean ages (49.17 ± 9.9 versus 44.11 ± 10.8 years old, p = 0.06) allow a more accurate comparison. Regarding severity, late-onset was similar to early-onset group: SLEDAI (8 (range: 6–22) versus 12 (range: 2–24), p = 0.47), creatinine (1.36 ± 0.94 versus 1.36 ± 1.13 mg/dl, p = 0.99); albumin (2.84 ± 0.65 versus 2.59 ± 0.84 mg/dl, p = 0.30); proteinuria (3.77 ± 2.18 versus 5.01 ± 4.51 g/vol, p = 0.26); proliferative nephritis (44% ( n = 8) versus 60% ( n = 45), p = 0.23). There was also no difference in the long-term outcomes between groups: SDI (1 (range: 0–5) versus 0.5 (range: 0–5), p = 0.27); creatinine (2.04 ± 2.38 versus 1.69 ± 2.26 mg/dl, p = 0.56); dialysis (22% ( n = 4) versus 13% ( n = 10), p = 0.46) and mortality (0% ( n = 0) versus 12% ( n = 9), p = 0.19). Conclusion This study provides novel evidence of comparable long-term outcomes between late-onset and early-onset nephritis, which is most likely explained by the observation that at presentation, the clinical, laboratorial and histological features of late-onset and early-onset nephritis are similar. This suggests that there should be no distinct treatment targets and therapeutic interventions for the late- and early-onset groups.

Our results suggest that patients with higher aGAPSS, might be at higher risk for developing extra-criteria manifestations of APS and should therefore undergo a thorough laboratory and instrumental evaluation.

Objective. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has progressed rapidly around the world, reaching a lethality of up to 20% due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This latter condition is a relevant concern for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); however, data on this topic are limited to few case series. Our objective was to evaluate in hospitalized patients with SLE and with COVID-19-associated ARDS (confirmed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction) the risk of mortality and combined poor outcomes (death, intensive care unit [ICU] admission, and/or mechanical ventilation [MV] use) and to compare with that of patients without SLE.Methods. This is a nationwide cross-sectional study of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 nested in the national Influenza Epidemiological Surveillance Information System (Sistema de Informação de Vigilância Epidemiológica da Gripe [SIVEP-gripe]). Mortality rates, frequencies of ICU admissions, and MV use for 319 patients with SLE and 251 800 patients without SLE were calculated as well as relative risks (RRs). A fully adjusted multiple logistic regression was performed to adjust factors, such as age and well-known comorbidities, that might impact worse outcomes.Results. Patients with SLE had an increased risk of death and combined poor outcome compared with patients without SLE (