BackgroundVascular complications are common during invasive cardiac electrophysiology procedures. This meta‐analysis compares outcomes following ultrasound and nonultrasound‐guided vascular access for these procedures.MethodsPubMed, Embase and Cochrane 01/01/1980‐30/09/2018 were searched for relevant studies to meta‐analyse.ResultsSeven studies (6269 patients) were included. Pooled rates and odds ratio(95% confidence interval) for ultrasound and nonultrasound subgroups were 1.2% vs 3.0%, 0.32 (0.21‐0.49) for all vascular complications, with less hematomas and arterial punctures but similar arteriovenous fistulas, pseudoaneurysms or retroperitoneal bleeds.ConclusionUltrasound guidance had less complications due to less hematoma and arterial puncture, and is generally recommended for electrophysiology procedures.
Background
We meta‐analyzed the efficacy and safety of catheter (CA) vs thoracoscopic (TA) ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF).
Methods
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched until 31/12/2019 for relevant randomized trials and subsequent pooled analyses.
Results
In six trials totaling 465 patients (254 CA/211 TA), 1‐year AF recurrences were higher for CA (46% vs 26%, odds ratio 2.90 [95% CI 1.32‐6.38]), whereas total adverse events were lower (10% vs 25%, 0.35 [0.14‐0.86], respectively).
Conclusion
CA has lower efficacy but higher safety than TA. CA should remain the first‐line AF ablation strategy, and TA reserved for selected CA‐resistant patients where rhythm control is clinically necessary.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.