Most cell of the dorsal laterial geniculate nucleus of rats are generated on fetal days 12 to 14. Their axons invade the telencephalon on fetal day 16 and run in the intermediate zone just below the cortical plate, reaching the visual area of fetal day 18. The axons do not invade the cortical plate significantly until close to birth (day 22 of gestation) and reach their zone of terminal distribution between postnatal days 1 and 4. In subsequent days the projection becomes progressively more heavily distrubuted in layers IV and I, and synapses of thalamic origin can be identified in these layers. While cells destined for layers IV cross the intermediate zone at the time that thalamic axons first arrive, this coincidence of growth does not seem to be a factor which determines the specificity of patterns of thalamocortical connections since the cells reach layer IV several days before the axons. It is unclear why the axons should wait several days in the region immediately below the cortical plate before invading; although there is a parallel in previous studies on the development of the chick retinotectal pathway (Crossland et al., '75).

1. To determine the possible role of the primate pretectal nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) in the generation of optokinetic and smooth-pursuit eye movements, we recorded the activity of 155 single units in four behaving rhesus macaques. The monkeys were trained to fixate a stationary target spot during visual testing and to track a small moving spot in a variety of visual environments. 2. The majority (82%) of NOT neurons responded only to visual stimuli. Most units responded vigorously for large-field (70 x 50 degrees) moving visual stimuli and responded less, if at all, during smooth-pursuit eye movements in the dark; many of these units had large receptive fields (greater than 10 x 10 degrees) that included the fovea. The remaining visual units responded more vigorously during smooth-pursuit eye movements in the dark than during movement of large-field visual stimuli; all but one had small receptive fields (less than 10 x 10 degrees) that included the fovea. For all visual units that responded during smooth pursuit, extinction of the small moving target so briefly that pursuit continued caused the firing rates to drop to resting levels, confirming that the discharge was due to visual stimulation of receptive fields with foveal and perifoveal movement sensitivity and not to smooth-pursuit eye movements per se. 3. Eighteen percent of all NOT units ceased their tonic discharge in association with all saccades including the quick phases accompanying optokinetic or vestibular nystagmus. The pause in firing began after saccade onset, was unrelated to saccade duration, and occurred even in complete darkness. 4. Most (90%) of the visual NOT units were direction selective. They exhibited an increase in firing above resting during horizontal (ipsilateral) background movement and/or during smooth pursuit of a moving spot and a decrease in firing during contralateral movement. 5. The firing rates of NOT units were highly dependent on stimulus velocity. All had velocity thresholds of less than 1 degree/s and exhibited a monotonic increase in firing rate with visual stimulus velocity over part (n = 90%) or all (n = 10%) of the tested range (i.e., 1-200 degrees/s). Most NOT units exhibited velocity tuning with an average preferred velocity of 64 degrees/s.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Humans use saccadic eye movements to make frequent gaze changes, yet the associated full-field image motion is not perceived. The theory of saccadic suppression has been proposed to account for this phenomenon, but it is not clear whether suppression originates from a retinal signal at saccade onset or from the brain before saccade onset. Perceptually, visual sensitivity is reduced before saccades and enhanced afterward. Over the same time period, the perception of time is compressed and even inverted. We explore the origins and neural basis of these effects by recording from neurons in the dorsal medial superior temporal area (

1. The anatomical connections of the dorsolateral pontine nucleus (DLPN) implicate it in the production of smooth-pursuit eye movements. It receives inputs from cortical structures believed to be involved in visual motion processing (middle temporal cortex) or motion execution (posterior parietal cortex) and projects to the flocculus of the cerebellum, which is involved in smooth pursuit. To determine the role of the DLPN in smooth pursuit, we have studied the discharge patterns of 191 DLPN neurons in five monkeys trained to make smooth-pursuit eye movements of a spot moving either across a patterned background or in darkness. 2. Four unit types could be distinguished. Visual units (15%) discharged in response to movement of a large textured pattern, often in a direction-selective fashion but not during smooth pursuit of a spot in the dark. Eye movement neurons (31%) discharged during sinusoidal smooth pursuit in the dark with peak discharge rate either at peak eye position or peak eye velocity, but they showed no response during background movement or during other visual stimulation. These units continued to discharge when the target was extinguished (blanked) briefly, and the monkey continued to make smooth eye movements in the dark. The majority (54%) of our DLPN units discharged during both smooth pursuit in the dark and background movement while the monkey fixated. Blanking the target during smooth pursuit revealed that these units fell into two distinct classes. Visual pursuit units ceased discharging during a blank, suggesting that they had only a visual sensitivity. Pursuit and visual units continued to discharge during the blank, indicating that they had a combined oculomotor and visual sensitivity. 3. Ninety-five percent of the units that discharged during smooth pursuit were direction selective. These units had rather broad directional tuning curves with widths at half height ranging from 65 to 180 degrees. Many preferred directions for DLPN units were observed, although the vertical and near-vertical directions predominated. 4. Most units that responded to large-field background movement were direction selective. During sinusoidal movement of a large-field background, half of them also discharged in relation to stimulus velocity, whereas others did not.

The pretectal nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) plays an essential role in optokinetic nystagmus, the reflexive movements of the eyes to motion of the entire visual scene. To determine how the NOT can influence structures that move the eyes, we injected it with lectin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase and characterized its afferent and efferent connections. The NOT sent its heaviest projection to the caudal half of the ipsilateral dorsal cap of Kooy in the inferior olive. The rostral dorsal cap was free of labeling. The NOT sent lighter, but consistent, projections to other visual and oculomotor-related areas including, from rostral to caudal, the ipsilateral pregeniculate nucleus, the contralateral NOT, the lateral and medial terminal nuclei of the accessory optic system bilaterally, the ipsilateral dorsolateral pontine nucleus, the ipsilateral nucleus prepositus hypoglossi, and the ipsilateral medial vestibular nucleus. The NOT received input from the contralateral NOT, the lateral terminal nuclei bilaterally, and the ipsilateral pregeniculate nucleus. Although our injections involved the pretectal olivary nucleus (PON), there was neither orthograde nor retrograde labeling in the contralateral PON. Our results indicate that the NOT can influence brainstem preoculomotor pathways both directly through the medial vestibular nucleus and nucleus prepositus hypoglossi and indirectly through both climbing and mossy fiber pathways to the cerebellar flocculus. In addition, the NOT communicates strongly with other retino-recipient zones, whose neurons are driven by either horizontal (contralateral NOT) or vertical (medial and lateral terminal nuclei) fullfield image motion.

The responses of neurons in the middle temporal and medial superior temporal areas of macaque cortex are suppressed during saccades compared with saccade-like stimulus movements. We utilized the short-latency ocular following paradigm to show that this saccadic suppression is followed by postsaccadic enhancement of motion responses. The level of enhancement decays with a time constant of 100 ms from saccade end. The speed of ocular following is also enhanced after saccades and decays over a similar time course, suggesting a link between the neural and behavioral effects. There is some evidence that maximum postsaccadic enhancement occurs when cells are stimulated at their optimum speeds. Latencies of motion responses are saccade dependent: 37 ms for saccade-generated motion, 45 ms for motion in the half-second after saccades, and 70 ms with no prior saccades. The finding that saccades alter response latencies may partially explain perceptual time compression during saccades and time dilation after saccades.

These results confirm those of earlier studies and furthermore suggest that the somata of palisade endings are located close to the extraocular motor nuclei--in this case, probably within the C and S groups around the periphery of the oculomotor nucleus. The multiple en grappe endings have also been shown to arise from these cells groups, but it is not possible to distinguish different populations in these experiments.

The development of gaze-stabilizing systems depends on normal vision during infancy. Monkeys reared with binocular lid suture (BLS) for the first 25-40 days of life have strabismus, optokinetic nystagmus deficits, latent nystagmus, and decreased binocular cells in the visual cortex and nucleus of the optic tract. When BLS is extended to 55 days, pendular and congenital nystagmus also occurs. Eyelids in infant monkeys are hairless and thin, but BLS still degrades sensory fusion, motion, and form perception. To determine to what extent these visual properties are critical in the development of normal gaze stabilization, we examined infant monkeys reared with one opaque contact lens over one eye, alternated to the fellow eye every other day (AMO); and monkeys reared in a 3-Hz strobe environment. Monkeys reared with AMO develop strabismus, but have normal optokinetic nystagmus and no spontaneous nystagmus. Area 17 is monocular, but the medial temporal area and the nucleus of the optic tract are binocular. Monkeys reared in strobe light develop pendular nystagmus but not strabismus. We were puzzled by the results of the AMO monkeys until we examined infant monkeys with BLS that were prevented from seeing form through the lids. This was done by leaving the tarsal plate intact behind the eyelid. They developed similar to the AMO monkeys. These results suggest that disruption of sensory fusion during infancy (BLS, AMO) causes strabismus. If strabismus occurs while the monkeys have some form vision from each eye (BLS without tarsal plate), then the nucleus of the optic tract becomes monocular, which causes optokinetic nystagmus deficits and latent nystagmus. Infant monkeys reared without visual motion develop pendular nystagmus.