The Vaca Muerta shale oil play in Argentina's Neuquén Basin is expected to make a large contribution to Argentina's hydrocarbon production in the future. In 2013, the U.S. Energy Information Administration estimated that the Vaca Muerta had technically recoverable reserves of 308 Tcf gas and 16 billion bbl of oil and condensate, making it the third largest shale oil reservoir in the world at that time. Wintershall Energia has been active in the Neuquén Basin since 1994. In 2014, it acquired a controlling interest in the Aguada Federal block with an intention to exploit the Vaca Muerta oil shale occurrence within that block. At the outset of its development program, Wintershall decided to incorporate microseismic monitoring to help understand completions in the Vaca Muerta. Monitoring of the completion of vertical well AF.x-1 was accomplished with a surface array. The goal of the monitoring was to inform later decisions on horizontal wellbore direction, wellbore and stage spacing, and landing depth. Results of the surface array monitoring were also used in the design of a permanent buried array intended to monitor subsequent development wells. The buried array was installed in September 2016 and consists of 126 stations spread at an interval distance of approximately 500 m over an area of roughly 5 by 7 km. Each station has geophones placed over a depth range of 20 to 50 m subsurface. The first two horizontal development wells in the project, AF.x-4h and AF.x-9h, were completed in late December 2016 and early January 2017. The second set of two wells, AF.x-3h and AF.x-7h, was completed from May to June 2017. The 4h and the 7h were landed in the upper Middle Vaca Muerta while the 9h and 3h were drilled about 100 m deeper, landing still in the Middle Vaca Muerta. The lateral length of each well was approximately 1000 m, and each was completed with 11 plug-and-perf stages. Stage length and interval were varied along the wells to test various completion strategies. The completions of all four wells were successfully monitored using the buried array. These microseismic data provide a detailed description of the fracture network created by the treatments. Focal mechanisms determined for the detected events have been used to understand the stress distribution in the reservoir and to further refine the completion parameters for future development wells.
Studies have shown that proppant injected into fractures during hydraulic stimulation rapidly increases in packing density as fluids leak off into surrounding rock. Stresses are amplified at proppant grain contacts elevating the potential for stress-corrosion cracking and chemical potential at the contacts. Together, these effects promote immediate mechanical compaction and drive chemical compaction throughout engineering time scales (Lee et al, 2010). Draining the reservoir further enhances stresses leaving the reservoir critically-stressed as fractures close. Injection of fluid induces microseismicity that generally propagates away from injection ports as fluid induces fractures at rates that can be modeled using a pressure-diffusion model (Shapiro, 2009). When the front encounters a depleted reservoir on offset wells, pressures accelerate through the fluid-filled pore network inducing shear failure causing microseisms with observed apparent propagation velocities much higher than typical fracture propagation rates and can be used to delineate depleted fractures (Dohmen, 2013) forming a snapshot of production in time. Microseismic data were collected during the treatment of a four-well pad in the Williston Basin. After five months of producing hydrocarbons from the first pad, a second pad was also treated and monitored proximal to the first. Microseismic events recorded during the second pad treatment extended toward and accelerated across the first pad, with the majority of offset activity occurring on the well closest to the second pad. By combining hypocenter locations, seismic moments, focal mechanisms, fluid leakoff, treatment volumes, and rock properties, we created a calibrated proppant-filled Discrete Fracture Network (DFN) model for each pad. To further condition the model for the second pad, we extended the methods of Shapiro and Dohmen to define multiple pressure-diffusion fronts to classify events associated with injected fluid, the offset pad, and depleted portions of the reservoir and utilized only fluid related events. Microseismic event locations monitored during the second pad coincide with the modeled proppant-filled fractures derived from the treatment of the first pad. Furthermore, events consistent with Dohmen's depletion zone coincide with distal producing wells over 6000 ft. away from injection ports. Results suggest that offset well microseismicity is associated with the more conductive offset proppant-pack and can be used to quantify the actual proppant distribution, validate the propped DFN model and identify compacted portions of the depleted reservoir.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.