There are currently few therapeutic options for patients with pancreatic cancer, and new insights into the pathogenesis of this lethal disease are urgently needed. Toward this end, we performed a comprehensive genetic analysis of 24 pancreatic cancers. We first determined the sequences of 23,219 transcripts, representing 20,661 protein-coding genes, in these samples. Then, we searched for homozygous deletions and amplifications in the tumor DNA by using microarrays containing probes for ~10 6 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. We found that pancreatic cancers contain an average of 63 genetic alterations, the majority of which are point mutations. These alterations defined a core set of 12 cellular signaling pathways and processes that were each genetically altered in 67 to 100% of the tumors. Analysis of these tumors' transcriptomes with next-generation sequencing-bysynthesis technologies provided independent evidence for the importance of these pathways and †To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Invasive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is an almost uniformly fatal disease. Several distinct noninvasive precursor lesions can give rise to invasive adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, and the prevention, detection, and treatment of these noninvasive lesions offers the potential to cure early pancreatic cancers. Noninvasive precursors of invasive ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas include pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias (PanINs), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), and mucinous cystic neoplasms. Diagnostic criteria, including a distinct ovarian-type stroma, and a consistent nomenclature are well established for mucinous cystic neoplasms. By contrast, consistent nomenclatures and diagnostic criteria have been more difficult to establish for PanINs and IPMNs. Because both PanINs and IPMNs consist of intraductal neoplastic proliferations of columnar, mucin-containing cells with a variable degree of papilla formation, the distinction between these two classes of precursor lesions remains problematic. Thus, considerable ambiguities still exist in the classification of noninvasive neoplasms in the pancreatic ducts. A meeting of international experts on precursor lesions of pancreatic cancer was held at The Johns Hopkins Hospital from August 18 to 19, 2003. The purpose of this meeting was to define an international acceptable set of diagnostic criteria for PanINs and IPMNs and to address a number of ambiguities that exist in the previously reported classification systems for these neoplasms. We present a consensus classification of the precursor lesions in the pancreatic ducts, PanINs and IPMNs.

Individuals with a family history of pancreatic cancer have an increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer. Quantification of this risk provides a rational basis for cancer risk counseling and for screening for early pancreatic cancer. In a prospective registry-based study, we estimated the risk of pancreatic cancer in individuals with a family history of pancreatic cancer. Standardized incidence ratios were calculated by comparing the number of incident pancreatic cancers observed with those expected using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) rates.

Objectives The aim of the study was to determine if there had been any change in the number of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN) cases detected, their evaluation or the management over time. Methods A systematic review of SPN was performed of all articles published in English in PubMed and SCOPUS. Results 2,744 patients with SPN identified in 484 studies published between 1961-2012; 87.8% cases were reported between 2000-2012. 2,408 (87.8%) females and the mean age was 28.5 years (S.D. ± 13.7). The most common symptom was abdominal pain in 63.6% and incidentally detected in 38.1%. There were 2,285 patients who underwent pancreatic resection. The mean tumor size was 8.6 cm (S.D ± 4.3). Follow-up was reported for 1,952 (90.5%) patients, with mean follow-up of 36.1 months (S.D. ± 32.8). Disease-free survival was documented in 1,866 (95.6%) patients with recurrence in 86 (4.4%); median time to recurrence was 50.5 months. Conclusions The number of SPNs reported in the literature has seen a 7-fold increase in the number of cases reported since 2000 compared to before. SPNs continue to be primarily found in young women and present with non-specific symptoms. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment with an excellent long term prognosis.

Background and aimThe International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening Consortium met in 2018 to update its consensus recommendations for the management of individuals with increased risk of pancreatic cancer based on family history or germline mutation status (high-risk individuals).MethodsA modified Delphi approach was employed to reach consensus among a multidisciplinary group of experts who voted on consensus statements. Consensus was considered reached if ≥75% agreed or disagreed.ResultsConsensus was reached on 55 statements. The main goals of surveillance (to identify high-grade dysplastic precursor lesions and T1N0M0 pancreatic cancer) remained unchanged. Experts agreed that for those with familial risk, surveillance should start no earlier than age 50 or 10 years earlier than the youngest relative with pancreatic cancer, but were split on whether to start at age 50 or 55. Germline ATM mutation carriers with one affected first-degree relative are now considered eligible for surveillance. Experts agreed that preferred surveillance tests are endoscopic ultrasound and MRI/magnetic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, but no consensus was reached on how to alternate these modalities. Annual surveillance is recommended in the absence of concerning lesions. Main areas of disagreement included if and how surveillance should be performed for hereditary pancreatitis, and the management of indeterminate lesions.ConclusionsPancreatic surveillance is recommended for selected high-risk individuals to detect early pancreatic cancer and its high-grade precursors, but should be performed in a research setting by multidisciplinary teams in centres with appropriate expertise. Until more evidence supporting these recommendations is available, the benefits, risks and costs of surveillance of pancreatic surveillance need additional evaluation.

Deregulated expression of SPARC/osteonectin, a secreted glycoprotein with multiple biological functions, has been associated with the progression of various cancers. Using microarrays, we previously identified SPARC as one of the genes induced by treatment with a DNA methylation inhibitor in pancreatic cancer cells. We therefore analysed the expression pattern and methylation status of the SPARC gene in pancreatic cancer. Gene expression profiling by oligonucleotide microarray and reverse transcription-PCR analyses demonstrated that SPARC mRNA was expressed in non-neoplastic pancreatic ductal epithelial cells, but was not expressed in a majority of pancreatic cancer cell lines. The loss of SPARC expression was associated with aberrant hypermethylation of its CpG island. Immunohistochemical labeling revealed that the SPARC protein was overexpressed in the stromal fibroblasts immediately adjacent to the neoplastic epithelium in primary pancreatic cancers, but rarely expressed in the cancers themselves. Primary fibroblasts derived from pancreatic cancer strongly expressed SPARC mRNA and secreted SPARC protein into the conditioned media, and treatment of pancreatic cancer cells with exogenous SPARC resulted in growth suppression. SPARC expression in fibroblasts from noncancerous pancreatic tissue was augmented by coculture with pancreatic cancer cells. These findings suggest that SPARC is a frequent target for aberrant methylation in pancreatic cancer and that SPARC expression in fibroblasts adjacent to pancreatic cancer cells is regulated through tumor-stromal interactions.

Mutations in the chromatin remodeling gene ARID1A have recently been identified in the majority of ovarian clear cell carcinomas. To determine the prevalence of mutations in other tumor types, we evaluated 759 malignant neoplasms including those of the pancreas, breast, colon, stomach, lung, prostate, brain and blood (leukemias). We identified truncating mutations in 6% of the neoplasms studied; non-truncating somatic mutations were identified in an additional 0.4% of neoplasms. Mutations were most commonly found in gastrointestinal samples with 12 of 119 (10%) colorectal and 10 of 100 (10%) gastric neoplasms, respectively, harboring changes. More than half of the mutated colorectal and gastric cancers displayed microsatellite instability and the mutations in these tumors were out-of-frame insertions or deletions at mononucleotide repeats. Mutations were also identified in 2% to 8% of tumors of the pancreas, breast, brain (medulloblastomas), prostate, and lung, and none of these tumors displayed microsatellite instability. These findings suggest that the aberrant chromatin remodeling consequent to ARID1A inactivation contributes to a variety of different types of neoplasms.

Purpose: Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma usually present with advanced-stage disease and a dismal prognosis. One effective strategy likely to improve the morbidity and mortality from pancreatic cancer would be the identification of accurate, noninvasive diagnostic markers that would enable earlier diagnosis of symptomatic patients and earlier detection of cancer in asymptomatic individuals at high risk for developing pancreatic cancer. In this study, we evaluated serum macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 (MIC-1) as a marker of pancreatic cancer.Experimental Design: MIC-1 expression in primary pancreatic cancers, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, and pancreatic cancer cell lines was determined using the National Center for Biotechnology Information serial analysis of gene expression database, oligonucleotide microarrays analysis, in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry. Serum MIC-1 levels were determined by ELISA in 80 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinomas, in 30 patients with ampullary and cholangiocellular carcinomas, in 42 patients with benign pancreatic tumors, in 76 patients with chronic pancreatitis, and in 97 healthy control subjects. The diagnostic performance of serum MIC-1 as a marker of pancreatic cancer was compared with that of serum CA19 -9.Results: Oligonucleotide microarray and serial analysis of gene expression data demonstrated that MIC-1 RNA levels were higher in primary pancreatic cancers, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, and pancreatic cancer cell lines than in nonneoplastic pancreatic ductal epithelium. MIC-1 expression was localized to the malignant epithelium in pancreatic adenocarcinomas by in situ hybridization. MIC-1 protein was expressed in 14 of 16 primary pancreatic adenocarcinomas (88%) by immunohistochemistry and was also expressed in some pancreata affected by pancreatitis but not in normal pancreas. Serum MIC-1 levels were significantly higher in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mean ؎ SD, 2428 ؎ 2324 pg/ml) and in patients with ampullary and cholangiocellular carcinomas (2123 ؎ 2387 pg/ml) than in those with benign pancreatic neoplasms (940 ؎ 469 pg/ml), chronic pancreatitis (1364 ؎ 1236 pg/ml), or in healthy controls (546 ؎ 262 pg/ml). An elevated serum MIC-1 (defined as 2 SD above the mean for healthy controls) performed as well as CA19 -9 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.81 and 0.77, respectively), and the combination of MIC-1 and CA19 -9 significantly improved diagnostic accuracy (P < 0.05; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.87; sensitivity, 70%; specificity, 85%).Conclusion: Serum MIC-1 measurement can aid in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.