Approximately 5% of Australian national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are derived from the northern beef industry. Improving the reproductive performance of cows has been identified as a key target for increasing profitability, and this higher efficiency is also likely to reduce the GHG emissions intensity of beef production. The effects of strategies to increase the fertility of breeding herds and earlier joining of heifers as yearlings were studied on two properties at Longreach and Boulia in western Queensland. The beef production, GHG emissions, emissions intensity and profitability were investigated and compared with typical management in the two regions. Overall weaning rates achieved on the two properties were 79% and 74% compared with typical herd weaning rates of 58% in both regions. Herds with high reproductive performance had GHG emissions intensities (t CO2-e t–1 liveweight sold) 28% and 22% lower than the typical herds at Longreach and Boulia, with most of the benefit from higher weaning rates. Farm gross margin analysis showed that it was more profitable, by $62 000 at Longreach and $38 000 at Boulia, to utilise higher reproductive performance to increase the amount of liveweight sold with the same number of adult equivalents compared with reducing the number of adult equivalents to maintain the same level of liveweight sold and claiming a carbon credit for lower farm emissions. These gains achieved at two case study properties which had different rainfall, country types, and property sizes suggest similar improvements can be made on-farm across the Mitchell Grass Downs bioregion of northern Australia.
Three samples of field-grown winter wheat (Triticum arstivum cv. Atou) with different protein contents were produced by late application of urea as a nitrogenous fertiliser. Baking tests (a conventional fermentation procedure) indicated that the breadmaking quality of the flours increased as protein content was raised from the lowest to the intermediate level, but that the flours of intermediate and highest protein content were of equivalent breadmaking quality. To compare gluten baking quality independently of protein quantity, loaves were also baked from 'flours' reconstituted to equivalent protein levels using the isolated glutens. The flours of low and intermediate protein content yielded glutens of similar baking quality. The gluten derived from the flour of highest protein content gave a lower loaf volume and texture score: subsequent biochemical investigations suggested that this was due to an effect of the relative levels of nitrogen and sulphur available to the plants grown on this particular soil. Analysis of the flours and glutens indicated that the ratio of su1phur:nitrogen fell as grain protein content increased and this correlated with a lower proportion of the sulphur amino acids cyst(e)ine and methionine. Gel electrophoresis studies revealed, in particular, an increase in the proportion of the sulphur-deficient, w-gliadin species as grain protein content increased. Agarose gel filtration chromatography of the flour and gluten proteins also suggested a correlation between the extent of aggregation of their glutenin components (mediated by disulphide bonds involving cystine residues) and their functional properties. The results of this study suggest that for wheat grown on this particular soil late application of high levels of a nitrogenous fertiliser in the absence of sulphur fertilisation led to a change in the balance between available nitrogen and available sulphur, such that the available sulphur levels became insufficient for 'normal' grain development. Nevertheless, the results indicated that considerable alteration in the biochemical characteristics of the flour proteins occurred before gluten baking quality was noticeably affected.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.