BackgroundWorldwide, patients are the cornerstone of bedside teaching of medical students. In this study, the authors aimed to assess patients’ acceptability toward medical students in teaching hospitals of the Faculty of Medicine of Kuwait University.MethodsNinehundred and ninety five patients were approached in 14 teaching hospitals; 932 patients agreed to participate (refusal rate is 6.3%). A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data.ResultsIn general, higher acceptance of students by patients was found when there is no direct contact between the patient and the student (e.g., reading patients’ files, presenting in outpatient clinic, observing doctors performing examination or procedures) compared to other situations (e.g., performing physical examination or procedures). Pediatrics patients showed higher acceptance of students compared to patients in other specialties, while Obstetrics/Gynecology patients showed the highest refusal of students. Gender of patients (especially females) and students appeared to affect the degree of acceptance of medical students by patients. Majority of the patients (436; 46.8%) believed that the presence of medical students in hospitals improves the quality of health care.ConclusionPatients are an important factor of bedside teaching. Clinical tutors must take advantage of patients who accept medical students. Clinical tutors and medical students should master essential communication skills to convince patients in accepting students, thus improving bedside teaching. Also, using simulation and standardization should be considered to address scenarios that most patients are unwilling to allow students to participate.

BackgroundChoosing a medical specialty can be either a daunting and confusing experience for some medical students and junior doctors or a foregone conclusion to others. The aim of this study is to evaluate factors affecting future specialty choice among medical students in Kuwait University.MethodsA self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data from medical students registered in Kuwait University during the academic year 2011/2012. Chi-square test and logistic regression were used to test the association between deciding a future specialty and students’ sociodemographic and academic factors.ResultsOf the 422 students approached, 387 (91.7%) decided to participate. A total of 144 (37.2%) students made a decision regarding their choice of future medical specialty. Pediatrics, general surgery, and cardiology were the most desired specialties – 18 (12.5%), 17 (11.8%), and 16 (11.1%) students requested these specialties, respectively. Only 61 (42.4%) of those who selected a future specialty received advice regarding their choice. Looking for a good treatment outcome for patients (66; 45.8%) and a challenging specialty (58; 40.3%) were the most influencing incentives when selecting a future specialty. Students in the clinical phase of their study were 3.014 (95% CI: 1.498–6.065) more likely to report on their decision regarding a future specialty compared to students in the basic medical sciences phase (p=0.002).ConclusionA variety of factors appeared to inspire medical students in Kuwait to choose a future medical specialty. When identified, these factors can be used by mentors of medical students and directors of residency training programs to motivate students to choose specialties that are limited in Kuwait.

The association between polymorphisms in the p53 tumor suppressor gene and breast cancer risk has been studied in many human populations with conflicting conclusions. However, similar studies in Arab women are not available, and the status of these polymorphisms in this ethnic population is not known. We investigated the status of four known p53 gene polymorphisms and their possible role in breast cancer risk in Arab women. Genotyping was performed for 288 breast cancer women and 188 controls to determine Pro47Ser, Arg72Pro, Intron 3 Ins16 bp and intron 6 (G > C) polymorphisms. The p53 variant Pro47Ser was detected only in one Kuwaiti breast cancer patient and was not detected in any of the control subjects. Frequency of Arg/Arg at codon 72 was 26.6% in controls and 28.1% in patients, Arg/Pro frequency was 59.6% in controls and 69.4% in patients, the Pro/Pro genotype was 13.8% in controls and 2.4% in patients. We observed that women with Pro/Pro genotype have decreased risk for developing breast cancer (OR=0.166, 95% CI=0.067-0.411, p<0.001). The intron 3 genotypes were A1/A1 (48.9%), A1/A2 (40.6%) and A2/A2 (10.5%) in controls and A1/A1(42.4%), A1/A2 (52.8%) and A2/A2 (4.8%) in cases. The intron 6 genotypes were 92.4% (GG), 7.6% (GC) and 0% (CC) in controls and 96.5% (GG), 3.5% (GC) and 0% (CC) in cases. No statistically significant differences between patients and controls were observed for intron 3 and intron 6 polymorphisms. Our data show that proline homozygosity at p53 codon 72 is associated with decreased breast cancer risk in Arab women.

Serum selenium level is significantly reduced among morbidly obese female patients seeking bariatric surgery.

No abstract