Objective: The objectives of this study were to report the incidence of gastrojejunal anastomic strictures that occurred in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) surgery and to determine the time course of presentation, associated perioperative factors, and response to balloon dilation. Subjects and Methods: All 126 patients who underwent LRYGB at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation between July 2003 and February 2005 were included. We utilized a transoral 21-mm circular stapler for the gastrojejunostomy. Patients with symptoms of anastomotic strictures underwent upper endoscopy by one surgeon (B.C.). A stricture was defined by the inability to pass a 10-mm gastroscope through the anastomosis. Balloon dilation was performed to 12 mm. Records were analyzed retrospectively and statistical analysis including Pearson χ2 statistics, Fisher’s exact test and Student’s t test were used when appropriate. Results: Symptomatic anastomotic strictures occurred in 29 (23%) patients. All patients presented with nausea, vomiting and dysphagia. The median time to diagnosis was 52 days (25–309 days). Symptoms resolved after one dilation in 25 (86%) of patients. Two and three dilations were required in 1 (3.5%) and 3 (10.5%) of patients, respectively. No patients had complications or required more than 3 dilations. Age, preoperative body mass index (BMI), and intraoperative blood loss did not correlate with stricture formation. Although nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were used by 46 (41%) of patients after surgery, there was no correlation with stricture formation. Conclusion: Symptomatic anastomotic strictures developed in nearly a quarter of patients who underwent LRYGB utilizing a transoral 21-mm circular stapled gastrojejunal anastomosis. A single endoscopic balloon dilation was usually adequate. Strictures were not predicted by perioperative factors.
Bariatric surgery for morbid obesity has been established as an effective treatment method and has been shown to be associated with resolution of co-morbidities. Despite its success, some patients may require revision because of weight regain or mechanical complications. From September 2005 to December 2009, 42 patients underwent revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). All procedures were performed by one surgeon. Demographics, indications for revision, complications, and weight loss were reviewed. Thirty-seven patients were treated with laparoscopic (n = 36) or open (n = 1) RYGB after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Four patient were treated with laparoscopic (n = 3) or open (n-1) RYGB after failed vertical banded gastroplasty, and one patient underwent open redo RYGB due to large gastric pouch. Conversion rate from laparoscopy to open surgery was 2.5% (one patient). Mean operative time was 145.83 ± 35.19 min, and hospital stay was 3.36 ± 1.20 days. There was no mortality. Early and late complications occurred in six patients (14.2%). The mean follow-up was 15.83 ± 13.43 months. Mean preoperative body mass index was 45.15 ± 7.95 that decreased to 35.23 ± 6.7, and mean percentage excess weight loss was 41.19 ± 20.22 after RYGB within our follow-up period. RYGB as a revisional bariatric procedure is effective to treat complications of restrictive procedures and to further reduce weight in morbidly obese patients.
Intraoperative endoscopy for LRNYGBP may reduce the leak rate postoperatively and also, may minimize postoperative endoscopy and surgical intervention for gastrointestinal bleeding.
A rapid rise in blood sugar was observed in the SG group following a standard test meal that was followed by reactive hypoglycemia. SG dramatically increases the GLP-1 response to a standard test meal but has no effect on GIP in a rat model of DIO.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.