No abstract

No abstract

Objective Our objectives were to investigate the recent frequency of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) HIV RNA escape and other CSF viral nucleic acid detection in people with HIV with neurological symptoms and to assess associated clinical factors. Method This was a retrospective cohort analysis of people with HIV who underwent CSF examination for clinical indications between 2017 and 2022. Individuals were identified from pathology records, and clinical data were recorded. CSF HIV RNA escape was defined as CSF HIV RNA concentrations greater than in plasma. CSF viral screen included herpes simplex virus types 1 (HSV‐1) and 2 (HSV‐2), varicella zoster virus (VZV), Epstein Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), human herpesvirus 6 (HHV‐6) and JC virus. When cases were detected in five or more people with HIV, associated clinical factors were assessed using linear regression modelling. Results CSF HIV RNA escape was observed in 19 of 114 individuals (17%) and was associated with the presence of HIV drug resistance mutations and non‐integrase strand transfer inhibitor‐based antiretroviral therapy (p < 0.05 for all) when compared to people with HIV without escape. Positive viral nucleic acid testing included EBV (n = 10), VZV (3), CMV (2), HHV‐6 (2) and JC virus (4). Detectable CSF EBV was not considered related to neurological symptoms and was associated with concomitant CSF infections in eight of ten individuals and with CSF pleocytosis, previous AIDS, lower nadir and current CD4 T‐cell count (p < 0.05 for all). Conclusion In people with HIV with neurological symptoms, the frequency of CSF HIV RNA escape remains similar to that in historical reports. Detectable EBV viral nucleic acid in the CSF was observed frequently and, in the absence of clinical manifestations, may be a consequence of CSF pleocytosis.

Introduction The International AIDS Society convened a multidisciplinary committee of experts in December 2020 to provide guidance and key considerations for the safe and ethical management of clinical trials involving people living with HIV (PLWH) during the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic. This consultation did not discuss guidance for the design of prevention studies for people at risk of HIV acquisition, nor for the programmatic delivery of antiretroviral therapy (ART). Discussion There is strong ambition to continue with HIV research from both PLWH and the research community despite the ongoing SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic. How to do this safely and justly remains a critical debate. The SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic continues to be highly dynamic. It is expected that with the emergence of effective SARS‐CoV‐2 prevention and treatment strategies, the risk to PLWH in clinical trials will decline over time. However, with the emergence of more contagious and potentially pathogenic SARS‐CoV‐2 variants, the effectiveness of current prevention and treatment strategies may be compromised. Uncertainty exists about how equally SARS‐CoV‐2 prevention and treatment strategies will be available globally, particularly for marginalized populations, many of whom are at high risk of reduced access to ART and/or HIV disease progression. All of these factors must be taken into account when deciding on the feasibility and safety of developing and implementing HIV research. Conclusions It can be assumed for the foreseeable future that SARS‐CoV‐2 will persist and continue to pose challenges to conducting clinical research in PLWH. Guidelines regarding how best to implement HIV treatment studies will evolve accordingly. The risks and benefits of performing an HIV clinical trial must be carefully evaluated in the local context on an ongoing basis. With this document, we hope to provide a broad guidance that should remain viable and relevant even as the nature of the pandemic continues to develop.

No abstract