Early pregnancies in women with a history of recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) are accompanied by a deficiency in vasodilatory and anti-aggregatory prostacyclin (PGI2) and/or overproduction of its endogenous antagonist thromboxane A2 (TXA2). We evaluated the effect of a low-dose aspirin (LDA) on PGI2 and TXA2 production and on pregnancy outcome in RSA women with and without detectable anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA). Of 82 RSA women studied, 66 became pregnant, and of them, 33 (six with elevated and 27 with normal ACA concentrations) were randomized to receive LDA (50 mg/day) and 33 (six with elevated and 27 with normal ACA concentrations) to receive placebo (PLA) from a mean of 6.6 days after the missed period to delivery. Treatment with LDA inhibited platelet TXA2 production similarly in RSA women with and without detectable ACA and with continuing pregnancies (7.0 +/- 0.7 ng/ml, LDA group versus 254.5 +/- 37.8 ng/ml, PLA group, mean +/- SEM, P < 0.0001) or miscarrying pregnancies (13.8 +/- 3.8 ng/ml compared with 233.6 +/- 59.8 ng/ml, P < 0.0001 respectively). Furthermore, LDA decreased urinary excretion of the TXA2 metabolite (2,3-dinor-TXB2) both in pregnancies which went to term (6.1 +/- 0.6 ng/mmol creatinine, LDA group versus 19.3 +/- 3.0 ng/mmol creatinine, PLA group, P < 0.0001) or again ended in miscarriage (4.7 +/- 0.8 ng/mmol creatinine versus 17.3 +/- 4.4 ng/mmol creatinine, P < 0.0001 respectively), but did not affect the excretion of the prostacyclin metabolite (2,3-dinor-6-keto-PGF1alpha). Early pregnancy ultrasound examination revealed a living fetus in 58 women. Of these, seven in the LDA group (23.3%, four with elevated and three with normal ACA concentrations) and five in the PLA group (17.9%, two with elevated and three with normal ACA concentrations; not significant) experienced a miscarriage. All infants were healthy, and the frequency of growth retardation was similar in both groups (13.0%). One woman in the LDA group (4.3%) and three women receiving PLA (13.0%) developed pre-eclampsia (not significant). Therefore, although treatment with LDA caused a desirable biochemical effect, it did not improve pregnancy outcome in RSA women with or without detectable ACA.

To assess and compare the gynaecological consequences of the use of 2 antioestrogens we examined 167 postmenopausal breast cancer patients before and during the use of either tamoxifen (20 mg/day, n = 84) or toremifene (40 mg/day, n = 83) as an adjuvant treatment of stage II–III breast cancer. Detailed interview concerning menopausal symptoms, pelvic examination including transvaginal sonography (TVS) and collection of endometrial sample were performed at baseline and at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of treatment. In a subgroup of 30 women (15 using tamoxifen and 15 toremifene) pulsatility index (PI) in an uterine artery was measured before and at 6 and 12 months of treatment. The mean (±SD) follow-up time was 2.3 ± 0.8 years. 35% of the patients complained of vasomotor symptoms before the start of the trial. This rate increased to 60.0% during the first year of the trial, being similar among patients using tamoxifen (57.1%) and toremifene (62.7%). Vaginal dryness, which was present in 6.0% at baseline, increased during the use of tamoxifen (26.2%) and toremifene (24.1%). Endometrial thickness increased from baseline (3.9 ± 2.7 mm) to 6.8 ± 4.2 mm at 6 months ( P < 0.001), and no difference emerged between the 2 regimens in this regard. Before the start of the antioestrogen regimen, the endometrium was atrophic in 71 (75.5%) and proliferative in 19 of 94 (20.2%) samples; 4 patients had benign endometrial polyps. During the use of antioestrogen altogether 339 endometrial samples were taken (159 in tamoxifen group, 180 in toremifene group). The endometrium was proliferative more often in the tamoxifen group (47.8%) than in the toremifene group (32.2%) ( P < 0.0001). 20 patients had a total of 24 polyps (17 in tamoxifen and 9 in toremifene group, P < 0.05) during the use of antioestrogens. One patient in the toremifene group developed endometrial adenocarcinoma at 12 months, and one patient had breast cancer metastasis on the endometrium. Tamoxifen failed to affect the PI in the uterine artery, but toremifene reduced it by 15.0% ( P < 0.05) by 12 months. In conclusion, tamoxifen and toremifene cause similarly vasomotor and vaginal symptoms. Neither regimen led to the development of premalignant endometrial changes. Our data suggest that so close endometrial surveillance as used in our study may not be mandatory during the first 3 years of use of antioestrogen treatment. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com

Antiestrogens are used in the treatment, and sometimes even in the prophylaxis, of breast cancer. Tamoxifen is the most commonly used antiestrogen, but toremifene is gaining in popularity. We compared here the effects of tamoxifen and toremifene on bone metabolism and density in 30 postmenopausal patients with breast cancer, who were randomized to receive tamoxifen (20 mg/day, n = 16) or toremifene (40 mg/day, n = 14) for 1 yr. Biochemical markers of bone resorption [urinary hydroxyproline, serum cross-linked carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen, urinary cross-linked aminoterminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx)] and bone formation [serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, and aminoterminal and carboxyterminal propeptide of type I procollagen] were assessed before treatment and at 6 and 12 months of the antiestrogen regimen. Bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar spine and proximal femur (neck, trochanter, and Ward's triangle) was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry before treatment and at 12 months of treatment. Urinary NTx decreased after 6 months' use of tamoxifen (mean fall: 33%) and of toremifene (mean fall: 16%). Use of tamoxifen was associated with a significant decrease in osteocalcin (mean fall: 25%) and aminoterminal propeptide of type I procollagen (mean fall: 22%), whereas toremifene failed to influence these markers. Tamoxifen increased BMD, on average, by 2% in the lumbar spine, 1% in the femoral neck, and 5% in Ward's triangle. Toremifene failed to increase BMD at any site measured, and in contrast, a slight trend toward a fall (-0.3 to -0.9%) in BMD was seen in patients treated with toremifene. Falls in urinary NTx, from baseline to 6 months, correlated significantly with changes in the lumbar spine BMD (r = -0.57, P = 0.0002) in the whole patient series. We conclude that tamoxifen (20 mg/day) increases BMD in postmenopausal breast cancer patients, whereas toremifene (40 mg/day) merely prevents the increasing age-associated fall in BMD. More prolonged studies on bone metabolism, comparing these two antiestrogens, are needed; but even now, clinicians should be aware of these differences between tamoxifen and toremifene.

No abstract

No abstract

Tamoxifen and toremifene are two mostly used antiestrogens in the treatment of breast cancer. To compare their effect on bone in postmenopausal breast cancer patients we measured the urinary output of two bone resorption markers, pyridinoline (Pyr) and deoxypyridinoline (Dpyr) as well as bone density (BMD) in 30 breast cancer patients using either tamoxifen (20 mg/day, n = 15) or toremifene (40 mg/day, n = 15) as adjuvant treatment of stage II breast cancer for 1 year. The urinary output of Pyr and Dpyr were assessed before and after 6 and 12 months of the antiestrogen regimen. Lumbar and femoral BMD were measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) before and after 12 months of treatment. Both tamoxifen and toremifene were associated with significant decreases in Pyr (mean fall 19.6% and 12.6%, respectively) and Dpyr (mean fall 21.6% and 15.5%, respectively) at 6 months. After 12 months' treatment, Pyr decreased by 30.8% and Dpyr by 21.2% in women using tamoxifen and significantly less in women using toremifene (10.1% and 4.9%, respectively). BMD in the lumbar spine decreased by 1.8% in the toremifene group but increased by 0.4% in the tamoxifen group; in the proximal femur, BMD increased slightly during both tamoxifen and toremifene treatment in all sites measured. Individual changes in Pyr and Dpyr at 6 months showed no significant relation to the change in BMD at 12 months. We conclude that tamoxifen (20 mg/day) and toremifene (40 mg/day) reduce the bone resorption similarly, and this can be detected by falls in urinary output of Pyr and Dpyr at 6 months of treatment.

Antiestrogens are used in the treatment, and sometimes even in the prophylaxis, of breast cancer. Tamoxifen is the most commonly used antiestrogen, but toremifene is gaining in popularity. We compared here the effects of tamoxifen and toremifene on bone metabolism and density in 30 postmenopausal patients with breast cancer, who were randomized to receive tamoxifen (20 mg/day, n = 16) or toremifene (40 mg/day, n = 14) for 1 yr. Biochemical markers of bone resorption [urinary hydroxyproline, serum cross-linked carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen, urinary cross-linked aminoterminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx)] and bone formation [serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, and aminoterminal and carboxyterminal propeptide of type I procollagen] were assessed before treatment and at 6 and 12 months of the antiestrogen regimen. Bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar spine and proximal femur (neck, trochanter, and Ward's triangle) was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry before treatment and at 12 months of treatment. Urinary NTx decreased after 6 months' use of tamoxifen (mean fall: 33%) and of toremifene (mean fall: 16%). Use of tamoxifen was associated with a significant decrease in osteocalcin (mean fall: 25%) and aminoterminal propeptide of type I procollagen (mean fall: 22%), whereas toremifene failed to influence these markers. Tamoxifen increased BMD, on average, by 2% in the lumbar spine, 1% in the femoral neck, and 5% in Ward's triangle. Toremifene failed to increase BMD at any site measured, and in contrast, a slight trend toward a fall (-0.3 to -0.9%) in BMD was seen in patients treated with toremifene. Falls in urinary NTx, from baseline to 6 months, correlated significantly with changes in the lumbar spine BMD (r = -0.57, P = 0.0002) in the whole patient series. We conclude that tamoxifen (20 mg/day) increases BMD in postmenopausal breast cancer patients, whereas toremifene (40 mg/day) merely prevents the increasing age-associated fall in BMD. More prolonged studies on bone metabolism, comparing these two antiestrogens, are needed; but even now, clinicians should be aware of these differences between tamoxifen and toremifene.

No abstract