Our stewardship team evaluated 19 months of discharge antibiotic prescriptions to determine prescribing appropriateness and to characterize the interventions made. Intervention occurred in 9.7% of patients, with a 58% acceptance rate. Most interventions were educational (antibiotic course was complete at time of intervention). Discharge antibiotic review is a potential stewardship tool.

Gonococcal infections have been increasing worldwide and in the United States. Rarely, Neisseria gonorrhoeae can cause disseminated disease, including endocarditis. We present a case of gonococcal endocarditis, confirmed by blood cultures and 16S rRNA sequencing on excised valvular tissue. Prior to presentation with heart failure, our patient was asymptomatic. Most gonococcal infections are diagnosed through routine screening of individuals at risk. During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare contact for nonurgent complaints has decreased, and test kit shortage has been a factor. With increased incidence and decreased opportunities for screening, healthcare providers should be aware of rising gonococcal infections, as well as potential complications.

We aimed to apply the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model to increase effectiveness and sustainability of the World Health Organization’s (WHOs) hand hygiene (HH) guidelines within healthcare systems. Our cross-sectional, mixed-methods study took place at Jimma University Medical Center (JUMC), a tertiary care hospital in Jimma, Ethiopia, between November 2018 and August 2020 and consisted of three phases: baseline assessment, intervention, and follow-up assessment. We conducted questionnaires addressing HH knowledge and attitudes, interviews to identify HH barriers and facilitators within the SEIPS framework, and observations at the WHO’s 5 moments of HH amongst healthcare workers (HCWs) at JUMC. We then implemented HH interventions based on WHO guidelines and results from our baseline assessment. Follow-up HH observations were conducted months later during the Covid-19 pandemic. 250 HCWs completed questionnaires with an average knowledge score of 61.4% and attitude scores indicating agreement that HH promotes patient safety. Interview participants cited multiple barriers to HH including shortages and location of HH materials, inadequate training, minimal Infection Prevention Control team presence, and high workload. We found an overall baseline HH compliance rate of 9.4% and a follow-up compliance rate of 72.1%. Drastically higher follow-up compared to baseline compliance rates were likely impacted by our HH interventions and Covid-19. HCWs showed motivation for patient safety despite low HH knowledge. Utilizing the SEIPS model helped identify institution-specific barriers that informed targeted interventions beyond WHO guidelines aimed at increasing effectiveness and sustainability of HH efforts.

Background Lack of hand hygiene (HH) amongst healthcare workers (HCWs) contributes to healthcare associated infections and the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms. We assessed HCW HH knowledge, attitudes, and compliance using WHO tools and applied the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model in interviews to help guide and increase sustainability of HH interventions. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study at Jimma University Medical Center (JUMC) in Jimma, Ethiopia. We assessed HCW’s HH knowledge and attitudes using questionnaires adapted from WHO resources via systematic sampling. Observations of HH practices at WHO’s 5 Moments of HH were conducted by non-identified, trained observers via systematic sampling. 22 semi-structured interviews were conducted via convenience sampling with HCWs using an interview guide based on the SEIPS model. Results We observed 1,386 HH moments and found a compliance rate of 9.38%, with compliance highest after contact with patient surroundings (27.92%) compared to the other four HH moments (1.77 - 9.57%). Of 251 survey participants, 13.6% had prior HH training and 69.9% reported routine HH compliance. The average knowledge score was 61.4%, with no significant difference between participants that identified as trained vs untrained (p=0.41). 68% of interview participants stated they were unaware of JUMC’s Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) team and are more likely to perform HH if a patient appears infectious. Interview participants cited multiple barriers to HH (table 1). Table 1 Conclusion Baseline HH compliance and knowledge were low despite perceived compliance and regardless of prior HH training. Relatively higher compliance after patient contact may be due to perceptions of patient infectiousness. Utilizing the SEIPS model as an adjunct to WHO HH guidelines has provided actionable items upon which the JUMC IPC team can focus to improve HH practices: providing a sustainable supply of alcohol hand rub, ongoing HH education targeting knowledge deficits, and enhanced IPC presence and HH monitoring. Disclosures Meredith Kavalier, MD, University of Wisconsin-Madison Global Health Institute (Grant/Research Support)

How to cite this article: Rasner CJ, Allen T, Kavalier M. Topical betadine exposure precipitating sterile cerebritis and systemic iodine toxicity.

Cerebritis may present with encephalopathy, seizures, localizing neurologic deficits, or death. Betadine is an antimicrobial solution with high iodine content, and iodine has well-known toxicity. Here we report a case of sterile cerebritis secondary to repeated betadine exposure from caring for an extensive open wound of the scalp.