2019
DOI: 10.1017/ice.2019.332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibiotic assessment at hospital discharge—Room for stewardship intervention

Abstract: Our stewardship team evaluated 19 months of discharge antibiotic prescriptions to determine prescribing appropriateness and to characterize the interventions made. Intervention occurred in 9.7% of patients, with a 58% acceptance rate. Most interventions were educational (antibiotic course was complete at time of intervention). Discharge antibiotic review is a potential stewardship tool.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Initial findings suggest discharge stewardship is well received and associated with less frequent use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and shorter antibiotic durations following hospitalization. 21 , 22 Compared to both the Barnett and Yogo studies, we observed higher rates of pharmacist interventions at discharge (25% vs 9.7% and 23%, respectively) and higher acceptance of pharmacist recommendations (70% vs 58% and 67%, respectively). Possible contributors to this difference include the structured nature of our timeout, the prospective quality of the study, and an established stewardship role of pharmacists in our hospital system.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Initial findings suggest discharge stewardship is well received and associated with less frequent use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and shorter antibiotic durations following hospitalization. 21 , 22 Compared to both the Barnett and Yogo studies, we observed higher rates of pharmacist interventions at discharge (25% vs 9.7% and 23%, respectively) and higher acceptance of pharmacist recommendations (70% vs 58% and 67%, respectively). Possible contributors to this difference include the structured nature of our timeout, the prospective quality of the study, and an established stewardship role of pharmacists in our hospital system.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Possible contributors to this difference include the structured nature of our timeout, the prospective quality of the study, and an established stewardship role of pharmacists in our hospital system. 21,22 Although our timeout led to frequent changes in discharge antibiotic prescriptions, no significant differences were observed in antibiotic use compared to the control. This lack of effect is likely multifactorial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Barnett et al performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study to evaluate the appropriateness of discharge antimicrobial prescriptions. 18 The AST reviewed 929 patients discharged on oral antimicrobials and made interventions on 9.7% (90/929) of prescriptions. Antimicrobial prescriptions were reviewed twice weekly, and as a result, 58% (52/90) of interventions were not implemented in a timely manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7] Discharge AS remains an important gap in the literature, and few studies are available to describe AS interventions in this area. [15][16][17][18] Given that several studies have demonstrated the need for improved antimicrobial prescribing at transitions of care, we sought to create a streamlined process to identify antimicrobial DRPs encountered at hospital discharge. Using existing resources, our AST was successful in identifying DRPs in more than 40% of oral discharge antimicrobial prescriptions reviewed during a 6-month period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation