BackgroundIn the case of tall trees in the field or in rugged terrain where an instrument cannot be placed operationally, beveling is a popular method used to measure in vitro photosynthesis. However, some studies and our own research have shown that net photosynthesis values measured in vitro are generally significantly lower than values measured in situ.MethodsTo develop a more accurate and applicable method for in vitro determination of photosynthesis, we evaluated five different methods for preparing detached tree branches to measure photosynthesis and gas exchange in vitro (beveling, cracking, splitting, girdling, and immersion in salicylic acid solution). Ten common tree-species were used.ResultsBy comparing light response curves and water-status data, we found that (1) it is possible, to some extent, to substitute in vitro measurement of photosynthetic characteristics of tree species for in situ measurement, provided a suitable treatment is employed; (2) the beveling method is likely to underestimate photosynthetic potential of some trees; (3) after cracking application, most detached branches effectively continued to absorb water; and (4) measurements obtained using detached tree-branches processed by the cracking method were closer to those obtained in situ in intact trees; (5) some tree species (Diospyros kaki, Eriobotrya japonica) appeared to be particularly sensitive to the cracking method, and their in-vitro maximum net photosynthesis rate (Pmax) was significantly less than the in-situ value (P < 0.05).DiscussionOur findings provide a methodological support for comprehensive and accurate measurement of plant functional traits. The use of the cracking method contributes to feasibility and reliability of the measurement of photosynthetic parameters in tall trees, thus providing more accurate photosynthetic parameters for the analysis of trade-off strategies at the leaf level.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.