Late preterm infants have poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes than term infants and have increased odds to have a mental and/or physical developmental delay.

No abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Late preterm infants (LPIs) (gestation 34 weeks and 0 days to 36 weeks and 6 days) compared with full-term infants (FTIs) are at increased risk for mortality and short-and long-term morbidity. The objective of this study was to assess the neurodevelopmental outcomes in a longitudinal cohort study of LPIs from infancy to school age and determine predictive values of earlier developmental testing compared with school-age testing. METHODS:We used general estimating equations to calculate the odds of school readiness in a nationally representative cohort of 4900 full-term and 950 late preterm infants. We generated positive and negative predictive values of the ability of the 24-month Mental Developmental Index (MDI) scores of the Bayley Short Form, Research Edition, to predict Total School Readiness Score (TSRS) at kindergarten age.RESULTS: In multivariable analysis, late preterm infants had higher odds of worse TSRSs (adjusted odds ratio 1.52 [95% confidence interval 1.06-2.18], P = .0215). The positive predictive value of a child having an MDI of ,70 at 24 months and a TSRS ,5% at kindergarten was 10.4%. The negative predictive value of having an MDI of .70 at 24 months and a TSRS .5% was 96.8%. Most infants improved score ranking over the study interval.CONCLUSIONS: LPIs continue to be delayed at kindergarten compared with FTIs. The predictive validity of having a TSRS in the bottom 5% given a MDI ,70 at 24 months was poor. A child who tested within the normal range (.85) at 24 months had an excellent chance of testing in the normal range at kindergarten. WHAT'S KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT:Late preterm infants, compared with full-term infants, have less proficiency in reading and math at school age, with increased need for individualized educational plans and special education services. They also have lower cognitive performance on standardized IQ exams.WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: Late preterm infants have worse outcomes at school entry, and development is variable during the preschool years, so socioeconomic status, language spoken in the home, maternal education, maternal race, and being a late preterm infant have a large impact.

Objectives: To establish the first regional quality improvement collaborative solely dedicated to follow-through care of high-risk infants after Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge and to characterize extremely low birth weight (ELBW) follow-up in New England. Methods: Eleven of 14 follow-up programs in New England partnered with the Vermont Oxford Network (VON) ELBW project for an initial data collection project. We collected information about the health status and developmental outcomes of infants born ≤1,000 g or younger than 28 weeks 2014-2016 at the 18-24 months corrected for gestational age (CGA) follow-up visit. VON collected and compiled the data. Results: Of 993 eligible infants, 516 (52.0%) had follow-up visits. The rehospitalization rate was 33.9%, mostly respiratory illness. Ninety-six children (19.3%) had weight less than 10th percentile and 44 (8.9%) had weight less than third percentile at 18-24 months. Only 170 (61.4%) children had recommended hearing screening after NICU discharge. Forty-six (9.1%) had cerebral palsy; 81 of the 441 infants that completed all 3 sections of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, third edition (18.4%) had any composite score less than 70. Over half of the social and demographic data were missing. Conclusion: Most quality initiatives in neonatology stop at NICU discharge. This first project by the New England Follow-up Network showed a low rate for clinical follow-up. It demonstrated many opportunities to improve postdischarge follow-through specific to NICU-based care. Future projects will aim to improve the quality of follow-through services through collaborative learning, data sharing, and comparative outcomes.

Objective To assess the effectiveness and outcomes of a targeted cytomegalovirus (CMV) testing protocol. Study Design Retrospective chart review. Setting Tertiary care institution. Methods Targeted screening for CMV in children who did not pass the newborn hearing screening (NHS) was introduced in July 2015 for the level 2 and 3 nurseries at our hospital. In January 2016, this policy was extended to include all nurseries. Retrospective chart review was performed for all newborns who did not pass their NHS between 2013 and 2020. CMV testing rates and related outcomes were compared before and after rollout. Results A total of 891 charts were reviewed for infants who did not pass their NHS: 530 (60%) had CMV testing, of which 8 (1.5%) tested positive. Three cases were detected prior to and 5 occurred after initiation of targeted screening. Six CMV+ infants demonstrated hearing loss on confirmatory auditory brainstem response, all of whom began treatment with oral valganciclovir. Hearing remained stable in 3 patients, progressed in 2, and improved in 1. The rate of CMV testing in children who did not pass their NHS increased from 14% to 88% after full implementation of targeted screening ( P < .001). The average age at initial infectious disease consultation was significantly younger for infants born after targeted screening ( P < .001). Conclusion Targeted screening is a feasible and effective method to identify CMV+ infants early in life. Implementation of a targeted screening program for CMV in children who do not pass the NHS resulted in significantly higher rates of CMV testing and earlier referral to infectious disease.

No abstract