Correction of genetic diseases requires integration of the therapeutic gene copy into the genome of patient cells. Retroviruses are commonly used as delivery vehicles because of their precise integration mechanism, but their use has led to adverse events in which vector integration activated proto-oncogenes and contributed to leukemogenesis. Here, we show that integration by lentiviral vectors can be targeted away from genes using an artificial tethering factor. During normal lentivirus infection, the host cell-encoded transcriptional coactivator lens epithelium-derived growth factor/p75 (LEDGF/p75) binds lentiviral integrase (IN), thereby targeting integration to active transcription units and increasing the efficiency of infection. We replaced the LEDGF/p75 chromatin interaction-binding domain with CBX1. CBX1 binds histone H3 di- or trimethylated on K9, which is associated with pericentric heterochromatin and intergenic regions. The chimeric protein supported efficient transduction of lentiviral vectors and directed the integration outside of genes, near bound CBX1. Despite integration in regions rich in epigenetic marks associated with gene silencing, lentiviral vector expression remained efficient. Thus, engineered LEDGF/p75 chimeras provide technology for controlling integration site selection by lentiviral vectors.

Nearly all cellular and disease related functions of the transcriptional co-activator lens epithelium-derived growth factor (LEDGF/p75) involve tethering of interaction partners to chromatin via its conserved integrase binding domain (IBD), but little is known about the mechanism of in vivo chromatin binding and tethering. In this work we studied LEDGF/p75 in real-time in living HeLa cells combining different quantitative fluorescence techniques: spot fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (sFRAP) and half-nucleus fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (hnFRAP), continuous photobleaching, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) and an improved FCS method to study diffusion dependence of chromatin binding, tunable focus FCS. LEDGF/p75 moves about in nuclei of living cells in a chromatin hopping/scanning mode typical for transcription factors. The PWWP domain of LEDGF/p75 is necessary, but not sufficient for in vivo chromatin binding. After interaction with HIV-1 integrase via its IBD, a general protein–protein interaction motif, kinetics of LEDGF/p75 shift to 75-fold larger affinity for chromatin. The PWWP is crucial for locking the complex on chromatin. We propose a scan-and-lock model for LEDGF/p75, unifying paradoxical notions of transcriptional co-activation and lentiviral integration targeting.

Heparan sulfate (HS) regulates the activity of various ligands and is involved in molecular recognition events on the cell surface and in the extracellular matrix. Specific binding of HS to different ligand proteins depends on the sulfation pattern of HS. For example, the interaction between antithrombin and a particular 3-O sulfated HS motif is thought to modulate blood coagulation. However, a recent study of mice defective for this modification suggested that 3-O sulfation plays other biological roles. Here, we show that Drosophila melanogaster HS 3-O sulfotransferase-b (Hs3st-B), which catalyzes HS 3-O sulfation, is a novel component of the Notch pathway. Reduction of Hs3st-B function by transgenic RNA interference compromised Notch signaling, producing neurogenic phenotypes. We also show that levels of Notch protein on the cell surface were markedly decreased by loss of Hs3st-B. These findings suggest that Hs3st-B is involved in Notch signaling by affecting stability or intracellular trafficking of Notch protein.

Within the nervous system, heparan sulfate (HS) of the cell surface and extracellular matrix influences developmental, physiologic and pathologic processes. HS is a functionally diverse polysaccharide that employs motifs of sulfate groups to selectively bind and modulate various effector proteins. Specific HS activities are modulated by 3-O-sulfated glucosamine residues, which are generated by a family of seven 3-O-sulfotransferases (3-OSTs). Most isoforms we herein designate as gD-type 3-OSTs because they generate HS gD+ , 3-O-sulfated motifs that bind the gD envelope protein of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) and thereby mediate viral cellular entry. Certain gD-type isoforms are anticipated to modulate neurobiologic events, because a Drosophila gD-type 3-OST is essential for a conserved neurogenic signaling pathway regulated by Notch. Information about 3-OST isoforms expressed in the nervous system of mammals is incomplete. Here, we identify the 3-OST isoforms having properties compatible with their participation in neurobiologic events. We show that 3-OST-2 and 3-OST-4 are principal isoforms of brain. We find these are gD-type enzymes, as they produce products similar to a prototypical gD-type isoform, and they can modify HS to generate receptors for HSV-1 entry into cells. Therefore, 3-OST-2 and 3-OST-4 catalyze modifications similar or identical to those made by the Drosophila gD-type 3-OST that has a role in regulating Notch signaling. We also find that 3-OST-2 and 3-OST-4 are the predominant isoforms expressed in neurons of the trigeminal ganglion, and 3-OST-2/4-type 3-O-sulfated residues occur in

No abstract

No abstract

The HIV replication cycle is an elaborate interplay between the viral machinery and cellular proteins. In this review we propose that protein–protein interactions between cellular proteins and HIV integrase are new targets for future antiviral therapy. We focus on the early steps of HIV replication, namely viral entry, uncoating, reverse transcription, trafficking, nuclear import and integration, and the host cell proteins involved herein. We then discuss the feasibility of developing small-molecule protein–protein interaction inhibitors as antiviral agents. Next, we review the HIV integrase cofactors described in the literature highlighting two validated cofactors, lens epithelium-derived growth factor/p75 and transportin-SR2, which are discussed in detail. Finally, a speculative viewpoint is given on small-molecule protein–protein interaction inhibitors as future HIV inhibitors.