Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an uncommon but malignant cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma with a high incidence of local recurrence, regional lymph node metastases, and subsequent distant metastases. The etiology of MCC remains unknown. It usually occurs in sun-exposed areas in elderly people, many of whom have a history of other synchronous or metachronous sun-associated skin lesions. The outcome for most patients with MCC is generally poor. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment. The role of adjuvant therapy has been debated. However, data from recent development support a multimodality approach, including surgical excision of primary tumor with adequate margins and sentinel lymph node dissection followed by postoperative radiotherapy in most cases, as current choice of practice with better locoregional control and disease-free survival. Patients with regional nodal involvement or advanced disease should undergo nodal dissection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and, perhaps, systemic platinum-based chemotherapy in most cases.

No abstract

No abstract

PURPOSE: Brachytherapy is critical for the curative treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. Although brachytherapy use is declining in the United States (U.S.), novel interstitial or intracavitary applicators and advances in image guidance for applicator placement and treatment planning have allowed for tumor dose escalation while reducing normal tissue toxicity. Recent survey data have suggested insufficient brachytherapy training for radiation oncology trainees in the United States. This study aimed to address these gaps by developing and piloting a simulationbased education (SBE) workshop for MR-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An SBE workshop was developed for graduate medical education (GME) trainees focusing on MR-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Four hands-on stations, simulating aspects of the procedure, were led by a team of gynecological brachytherapy experts. The learners were radiation oncology residents and fellows in a U.S. GME training program. The primary outcome was feasibility, assessed by completion of the workshop within the time constraints of the curriculum. Learners completed preworkshop and postworkshop surveys to provide information on efficacy. RESULTS: The workshop was successfully completed in a 1-h block of GME didactic time. Ten trainees completed all four stations, and all completed preworkshop and postworkshop surveys, which showed improvements in knowledge and technical proficiency. Feedback was positive, and trainees requested additional learning opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that GME-focused SBE in MR-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy was feasible. SBE provided a nonclinical environment in which to practice aspects of MR-guided brachytherapy. Ongoing work includes collaboration with other U.S. institutions. Future studies should focus on international adaptation.

No abstract

Phyllodes tumors of the breast have biphasic histological features with both epithelial and stromal components. Careful characterization of the stromal compartment is critical since it is the pathologic features of the stromal cells that determine its malignant potential. We present a case report of a woman with an aggressive malignant phyllodes tumor with sarcomatous differentiation, who succumbed to metastatic disease within 8 months of initial presentation.

No abstract

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) focuses higher doses of radiation during a shorter interval to the lumpectomy cavity, in the setting of breast conserving therapy for early stage breast cancer. The utilization of APBI has increased in the past decade because of the shorter treatment schedule and a growing body of outcome data showing positive cosmetic outcomes and high local control rates in selected patients undergoing breast conserving therapy. Technological advances in various APBI modalities, including intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy, intraoperative radiation therapy, and external beam radiation therapy, have made APBI more accessible in the community. Results of early APBI trials served as the basis for the current consensus guidelines, and multiple prospective randomized clinical trials are currently ongoing. The pending long term results of these trials will help us identify optimal candidates that can benefit from ABPI. Here we provide an overview of the clinical and cosmetic outcomes of various APBI techniques and review the current guidelines for selecting suitable breast cancer patients. We also discuss the impact of APBI on the economics of cancer care and patient reported quality of life.