Shortages of trained personnel in special education are widely recognized. This need typically translates to special education programs as efforts to increase the numbers of professionals who are appropriately prepared to teach students with disabilities. The difficulty of increasing on-campus sections to respond effectively to the escalating need for more and better trained teachers, has in some cases led to an increased emphasis on alternative ways to deliver required course work. Distance learning is one such alternative. Distance learning can be defined as the separation of the learner from the instructor in location (learner and instructor in different rooms or at different sites), and, in some instances, by time. The promise of distance learning offers an attractive alternative for increasing the numbers of appropriately prepared special education personnel by making college-level instruction easier to receive. Current practices support synchronous communication (e.g., two-way audio, two-way video in real time, or two-way audio, one-way video in real time) and asynchronous communication (E-mail, or the Asynchronous Learning Network which does not necessarily occur in real time but at varying times depending on participants needs). Although it is possible to increase enrollments via distance learning, professionals recognize that there are some potential problems as well. If careful planning and course delivery are not clearly articulated students at remote sites can feel as if they are not part of the whole and that the education they are receiving is substandard. This article reviews promises, practices, and pitfalls associated with distance learning in an effort to inform special education professionals about this increasingly popular personnel preparation alternative.
Techuology-mediated distance education (e.g., two-way interactive television, Web based instruction) is revolutionizing the delivery of university-level courses. The great promise provided by increased enrollments in efforts to meet supply and demand needs has made learning at a distance particularly popular in special education. In this research, student ratings were compared in a methods course that was affered on campus and off campus using different means of instruction. Students' ratings were also compared for students in the distance education course at local and remote facilities. End-of-course student evaluations (e.g., overall mean, and component evaluations which examined course, instructor, and general evaluation items) were examined using an independent groups comparison design. Analysis of outcome measures revealed no difference in the overall course means. Overall ratings as well as cluster ratings for course, instructor, and general items were similar for a methods and materials course in learning disabilities taught on campus and at a distance. When outcome measures for on-campus students vs. off-campus students were examined, again, no differences were evident in the overall ratings. Similarly, course, instructor, and general item ratings were similar across settings and courses. Implications for future research in planning, implementing, and evaluating instruction at a distance are suggested.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.