Biodegradable plastics appear as one promising means to help solving the increasing issue of environmental pollution by plastics. The present study aims at comparing the biodegradation mechanisms of two promising biodegradable plastics, PHBV Poly(3hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) and PBSA Poly(butylene succinate-co-adipate) with the objective to provide a better understanding of the mechanisms involved and identify the most relevant indicators to follow biodegradation. For this purpose, the progress of the biodegradation process was monitored under controlled composting conditions at the laboratory scale at 58°C using several methodological approaches for evaluating polymer degradation. Indicators of the extent of material disappearance based on respirometry and mass loss were combined to other indicators evidencing the morphological, structural and chemical modifications induced at the surface or in the bulk of the material as surface erosion by MEB and AFM, decrease of molecular weight by GPC, crystallinity changes by DSC and chemical changes by ATR-FTIR. As expected, both polymers were rapidly biodegraded in less than 80 days. However, in spite of its higher molecular weight and degree of crystallinity PHBV degraded faster than PBSA, which led to suggest that different biodegradation mechanisms would be involved. At this regard, a two-phase scenario was proposed for each polymer on the strength of all the degradation-induced changes observed at the polymer surface and in its bulk. Based on these two scenarios, the discrepancy in biodegradation rate between PHBV and PBSA would be essentially attributed to significant differences in crystals morphology and spatial organization of both polymers.Regarding the relevance of the different indicators studied, mass loss stood out as the most relevant and accurate indicator to assess the disappearance of material especially when combined with respirometry and mineralization kinetics assessment. Besides, indicators focusing on the surface changes as SEM, AFM and POM were emphasized since seen as powerful tools to evidence morphological changes at different scales. At last, changes in thermal properties as crystallinity rate and melting temperature, even if complex to interpret due to the wide range of interdependent mechanisms they bring into play 2 appeared as inescapable tools for improving the understanding of the underlying mechanisms involved in polymer biodegradation.
Summary Natural rubber, produced by coagulation of the latex from the tree Hevea brasiliensis, is an important biopolymer used in many applications for its outstanding properties. Besides polyisoprene, latex is rich in many nonisoprene components such as carbohydrates, proteins and lipids and thereby constitutes a favourable medium for the development of micro‐organisms. The fresh rubber coagula obtained by latex coagulation are not immediately processed, allowing the development of various microbial communities. The time period between tree tapping and coagula processing is called maturation, during which an evolution of the properties of the corresponding dry natural rubber occurs. This evolution is partly related to the activity of micro‐organisms and to the modification of the biochemical composition. This review synthesizes the current knowledge on microbial populations in latex and natural rubber coagula of H. brasiliensis and the changes they induce on the biochemistry and technical properties of natural rubber during maturation.
Natural rubber is a key elastomer for the tyre industry and for a variety of other applications. The majority of raw NR is obtained by natural coagulation of H. brasiliensis latex under the activity of micro-organisms. An improved understanding of the microbial communities involved in the maturation of NR coagula may lead to an improvement in the production process of raw NR to provide a better consistency in NR quality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.