Aims We translated the ABC adherence taxonomy (i.e. 7 terms and their corresponding definitions) published by Vrijens et al. (2012) into French and German without changing the original meaning with the aim to promote a standardised taxonomy for medication adherence to French‐ and German‐speaking researchers and clinicians. Methods A Delphi survey was performed. To generate round 1, we identified French and German synonyms for the 7 adherence terms through a literature search in PubMed. Investigators translated the original English definitions into French and German. Panellists were members of ESPACOMP—the International Society for Patient Medication Adherence; experts suggested by ESPACOMP members and first authors of medication adherence publications in French and German. Google forms were used to create online questionnaires. Delphi rounds were performed until consensus was reached. The consensus was defined according to the acceptance rate as moderate consensus (50–75%), consensus (>75–95%), and strong consensus (>95%). Results The literature search resulted in 4–6 (French) and 4–7 (German) items per English term. Delphi rounds were launched between November 2016 and April 2018. Three rounds sufficed to reach consensus on all terms and definitions from 26 French‐speaking and 25 German‐speaking panellists. Preferred terms for medication adherence are adhésion médicamenteuse (82%) in French and Medikamentenadhärenz (88%) in German. Conclusion The use of a common terminology for medication adherence with translations in French and German will contribute to standardise the vocabulary, to harmonise research projects and ultimately ease comparison of study results among researchers and clinicians.
Background: Pharmacists are increasingly involved in strategies to fight antimicrobial resistance by ensuring optimised antibiotic (AB) use, including adherence support. Successful adherence interventions should be tailored to patients’ barriers and validated instruments are needed. This study aimed to identify adherence barriers to AB treatment, develop a self-report questionnaire, and validate it in outpatients. Method: Adherence barriers were identified through a systematic literature search and focus group discussion. Unmodifiable and irrelevant barriers were excluded from further processing. A validation study assessed the questionnaire’s internal reliability and construct validity by comparing the questionnaire’s score with electronically monitored adherence data. Results: A 15-item questionnaire was created. Overall, 68 patients were included in the construct validation analysis (60.3% female). The mean consecutive taking adherence was 88% and the most frequently reported barriers were “worries about side-effects” (37%) and “having swallowing difficulties” (19%). Three items were excluded from the questionnaire, which was supported by an increase of Cronbach’s alpha (0.69 to 0.70). The 12-item version’s score correlated significantly with medication adherence rate (r = −0.34, p < 0.01). Conclusion: The self-report questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool to pre-emptively assess adherence barriers in outpatients prescribed ABs. In the future, appropriate adherence interventions can be matched to barriers and tested in a pilot intervention study.
Information on medication adherence is missing in patient files, although it might be helpful to optimize treatment. An adherence report that presents data from electronic adherence monitoring and provides recommendations regarding pharmacological treatment could close this gap. We aimed to develop an adherence reporting form that combines suitable calculations and graphical representations to facilitate the physicians’ interpretation of (non-)adherence. Two consensus development panels were conducted. First, pharmacists with expertise in adherence monitoring debated the items needed to calculate and illustrate electronic adherence data. Second, physicians discussed the items they would need for an adherence report and were encouraged to propose new items. Preference was indicated by raising a green or red card. Voting was repeated until consensus was obtained. Third, first drafts of the adherence reporting form were created by two pharmacists. Seven pharmacists agreed on four metrics to express medication adherence and three graphical representations. Five physicians approved the four metrics and rated the dot chart as the most useful illustration for judging the patient’s adherence patterns. Additionally, they required a clinical–pharmaceutical evaluation of the adherence estimates considering drug-related properties. We developed an adherence reporting form for the first time in a compact format and based on the recommendations of experts. In addition, we considered the preferences of physicians, who appreciated the clarity of the reporting form.
In many countries, community pharmacies provide sexual-health-related services to limit the spread of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including chlamydia testing. To identify suitable target groups for pharmacy-based chlamydia testing in Switzerland, we aimed to assess chlamydia prevalence, identify risk groups, and delineate screening strategies. We conducted a systematic literature search up to December 2019 in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, according to the PRISMA guidelines, using as keywords “chlamydia”, “screening”, and “Switzerland”. Two researchers screened the title, abstract, and full-text article and assessed the methodological quality. The literature search generated 108 hits, and nine studies were included. Chlamydia prevalence ranged between 0.8 and 12.8%. Most frequently affected were undocumented women undergoing voluntary termination of pregnancy (12.8%, 95% CI: 8.4–18.9), HIV-positive men who have sex with men (10.9%, 95% CI: 9.2–17.6), and adult offenders (6.5%, 95% CI: 3.2–9.0). Systematic screening was suggested for the first two risk groups and women suffering a miscarriage. To conclude, chlamydia infections are prevalent in Switzerland, but the identified risk groups are difficult to reach for a pharmacy-based testing service. More studies are needed to identify suitable target groups, including customers seeking sexual health services, particularly emergency contraception users who already receive counselling for STIs at community pharmacies.
Background: Growth and differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15), a divergent member of the TGF-β protein superfamily, shows low physiological baseline expression. GDF-15 is, however, strongly upregulated during pregnancy. It is further induced in stressed and damaged tissues, where it limits immune infiltration and inflammation. In solid tumors, GDF-15 was shown to be a key inhibitor of T-cell infiltration. While this might already explain the strong correlation between GDF-15 overexpression and poor survival with or without checkpoint-based immunotherapy, effects of GDF-15 on dendritic cells and monocytes may further shape the tumor microenvironment. Methods: To analyze the impact of GDF-15 in murine tumor models, GDF-15 was either deleted by CRISPR/CAS9 gene editing or neutralized by administration of a blocking antibody. Effects on tumor growth were recorded and the composition of the tumor microenvironment was characterized by flow cytometry. More detailed insight into tumor-immune interactions was obtained via the CrownBio Mouse I/O RNA-Seq Panel. Specific effects on polarization of innate and on antigen-specific priming of adaptive immune cells were confirmed in cellular assays in vitro. Results: Tumor-derived GDF-15 modulates the tumor microenvironment by inhibiting infiltration and activation of myeloid cells. GDF-15 thereby impairs the induction of antitumoral immune responses. Deletion of GDF-15 enhances infiltration of innate cells into immune-excluded tumors, supports the priming of naïve T cells by dendritic cells and generates a pro-inflammatory tumor microenvironment. In vitro, GDF-15 inhibits DC maturation and synapse formation, thus preventing successful T-cell activation. Moreover, GDF-15 interferes with M1 polarization of macrophages. Conclusion: GDF-15 secretion helps tumors to generate a microenvironment that is poorly infiltrated by immune cells. GDF-15 further polarizes myeloid cells towards a tumor-promoting, anti-inflammatory phenotype. By inducing a more pro-inflammatory tumor phenotype, anti-GDF-15 antibodies may synergize with other immunotherapeutic agents. A clinical trial combining anti-GDF-15 (CTL002) with anti-PD-1 (NCT04725474) is ongoing. Citation Format: Markus Haake, Beatrice Haack, Sabrina Genßler, Julia Weigandt, Marlene Auer, Vincent Thiemann, Wahid M. Haq, Melanie Haag, Florian Wedekink, Birgitt Fischer, Kathrin Klar, Matthias Wölfl, Christine Schuberth-Wagner, Jorg Wischhusen. Tumor-derived GDF-15 promotes immune escape of tumors by functional alteration of the myeloid compartment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 6118.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.