No abstract
Herbicides applied in cropping in the Great Barrier Reef catchment in Queensland, pose a threat to water quality in riverine environments and the reef lagoon. With the introduction of ReefPlan in 2009, which sets a target of a 50% reduction in herbicides entering the Great Barrier Reef lagoon by 2013, there is a need to investigate water quality implications of weed management practices. Models are the most logical approach to extrapolate from the relatively small experimental database to a wider range of conditions and also investigate the impact of management options. Towards this end, a pesticide module has been added to the HowLeaky crop and soil water balance model. This pesticide module is based on algorithms from GLEAMS. An extraction coefficient to predict concentrations of chemicals in runoff as a function of soil concentrations is a central concept. Good agreement has been found between model predictions and measured data for pesticide runoff from experimental field sites. Sensitivity analysis shows major factors affecting transport potential are the application rate and degradation rate of the pesticide. Using modelled simulations, the water quality impacts of weed management practices incorporating a heavy reliance on residual herbicides (atrazine, diuron) in grains farming have been explored and compared to the use of knockdowns herbicides (e.g. 2,4-D, glyphosate). Several pesticides that are being increasingly used in the grains and cane industry in Queensland are also assessed (e.g. isoxaflutole, s-metolachlor, pendimethalin). Simulation results demonstrate that reducing the use of residuals in favour of knockdown herbicides would result in an improvement in runoff water quality. However, caution is needed when selecting 'emerging' pesticides to replace the traditionally applied residuals, as use of these products may not lead to improved water quality. The examples presented demonstrate the utility of the HowLeaky pesticides module for exploring runoff water quality implications from weed management practice options in cropping lands.
Agriculture in the catchment areas adjacent to the World Heritage listed Great Barrier Reef (GBR) Marine Park generates pollutants that are a concern for the health of the Reef. Under the Paddock to Reef Integrated Monitoring, Modelling and Reporting program (P2R) of the Reef Plan, the impacts of improved agricultural management practices on water quality entering the GBR are modelled to evaluate the effectiveness of Government water quality improvement policies. The Source Catchments modelling framework estimates loads of pollutants entering the GBR lagoon from rivers. However, Source Catchments does not have the capacity to represent the collection of management practices available to farmers that affect water quality in runoff and drainage at a paddock scale. Therefore, paddock scale agricultural systems models were used to demonstrate the effects of management practice adoption and to provide input to the catchment scale models. Paddock scale models were used because they represent a level of process detail compatible with the management practice investments and implementation on-ground. A fit-for-purpose modelling approach was used, where the paddock model most suited to a given land use and/or water quality pollutant was applied. Three one-dimensional agricultural systems models were employed; HowLeaky in grains, APSIM in sugarcane with HowLeaky post-processing for herbicides and phosphorous and GRASP in grazing lands. These models share similar soil water balance, ground cover and runoff sub-models. However, they vary in the level of detail, particularly in terms of representing crop growth and in the processes considered, such as pesticide degradation and export. In grains and sugarcane cropping, the pollutant time-series (e.g. load per day per unit area) in the Source Catchments models was replaced with an output time-series from HowLeaky or APSIM for each soil-climate spatial combination. Management practices were grouped into systems classed as A, B, C or D. The proportion of each of these management systems contributing to the modelled loads was adjusted to reflect data on the prevalence of adoption of improved management practices in the GBR catchment. In grazing lands, GRASP pasture utilisation and ground cover time-series outputs were interrogated to derive relationships between changes in grazing system management and changes in the USLE C-factors. The USLE is used to predict hillslope erosion in the Source Catchments model. Scaling indices derived from GRASP outputs were used to adjust the USLE C-factors applied in Source Catchments where management practices had changed. The P2R program has demonstrated the effectiveness of linking paddock scale models or emergent models derived from them with catchment scale models. This has enabled detailed management options to be simulated to investigate broad scale water quality impacts of the adoption of improved agricultural practices.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.