We hypothesized that epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR) activation and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) -induced angiogenic signals are important for the progression and metastasis of human salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). To test this hypothesis, we evaluated the therapeutic effect of AEE788, a dual inhibitor of EGF and VEGF receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinases, on human salivary ACC. In clinical specimens of salivary ACC, EGF and VEGF signaling proteins were expressed at markedly higher levels than in adjacent normal glandular tissues. We examined the effects of AEE788 on salivary ACC cell growth and apoptosis and on the phosphorylation of EGFR and VEGFR-2 in salivary ACC cells. Treatment of salivary ACC cells with AEE788, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, led to growth inhibition, induction of apoptosis, and dose-dependent inhibition of EGFR and VEGFR-2 phosphorylation. To determine the in vivo antitumor effects of AEE788, nude mice with orthotopic parotid tumors were randomized to receive oral AEE788 alone, paclitaxel alone, cisplatin alone, a combination of AEE788 plus paclitaxel, a combination of AEE788 plus cisplatin, or a placebo. AEE788 inhibited tumor growth and prevented lung metastasis in nude mice. To study the mechanism of interaction between AEE788 and chemotherapy, AEE788 was found to potentiate growth inhibition and apoptosis of ACC tumor cells mediated by chemotherapy. Tumors of mice treated with AEE788 and AEE788 plus chemotherapy exhibited down-regulation of activated EGFR and VEGFR-2, increased tumor and endothelial cell apoptosis, and decreased microvessel density, which correlated with a decrease in the level of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression and a decrease in the incidence of vascular metastasis. These data show that EGFR and VEGFR can be molecular targets for therapy of salivary ACC.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate enterovirus 71 (EV-A71) vaccine candidate strains, including their genotypes, immunogenicity and cross-neutralization capacity. Methods: From clinical samples, EV-A71 strains were separated by using Vero cells. Six strains were chosen for vaccine candidates, and the sequences were analyzed. To detect the immunogenicity of the strains, we used them to immunize NIH mice at 0 and 14 days. Cytopathic effects (CPE) were examined to determine the EV-A71 neutralizing antibody (NTAb) titer 14 d after the first and second inoculations. To evaluate the cross-neutralizing capacity of the EV-A71 vaccine candidate strains, we tested serum immunized mice with ten EV-A71 genotype strains. Results: Six EV-A71 vaccine candidate strains were identified, all belonging to sub-genotype C4, the prevalent genotype in China. The sequence similarity of the VP1 regions of the six candidate vaccine strains and three approved inactivated vaccines was 97.58%–97.77%, and the VP1 amino acid similarity was 98.65%–99.33%. Experiments were performed to evaluate the immunogenicity and cross-neutralizing activity of the EV-A71 vaccine candidate strains. The strains had good immunogenicity 14 d after two immunizations, inducing an NTAb titer ranging from 1:94 to 1:346. The NTAb seroconversion rates 14 d after one immunization were above 80% (except HB0007), and significantly increased immunogenicity of EV-A71 strains was observed post-inoculation. Furthermore, our candidate vaccine strains had broad cross-neutralizing activity after challenge with ten sub-genotypes of EV-A71. The highest NTAb titer/lowest NTAb titer ratios of sera against EV-A71 sub-genotypes were 8.0 (JS0002), 8.0 (JS0005), 21.3 (HB0005), 21.3 (HB0007), 10.7 (HB0040) and 8.0 (GD0002), respectively. Conclusions: Our EV-A71 strains had good immunogenicity and cross-neutralization activity, and have the potential to serve as vaccine strains for multivalent hand, foot and mouth disease vaccines.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.