Sterilization is the process of killing all microorganisms, while disinfection is the process of killing or removing all kinds of pathogenic microorganisms except bacterial spores. Biomaterials involved in cell experiments, animal experiments, and clinical applications need to be in the aseptic state, but their physical and chemical properties as well as biological activities can be affected by sterilization or disinfection. Decellularized matrix (dECM) is the low immunogenicity material obtained by removing cells from tissues, which retains many inherent components in tissues such as proteins and proteoglycans. But there are few studies concerning the effects of sterilization or disinfection on dECM, and the systematic introduction of sterilization or disinfection for dECM is even less. Therefore, this review systematically introduces and analyzes the mechanism, advantages, disadvantages, and applications of various sterilization and disinfection methods, discusses the factors influencing the selection of sterilization and disinfection methods, summarizes the sterilization and disinfection methods for various common dECM, and finally proposes a graphical route for selecting an appropriate sterilization or disinfection method for dECM and a technical route for validating the selected method, so as to provide the reference and basis for choosing more appropriate sterilization or disinfection methods of various dECM.
The objective of this study was to fabricate an acellular sheep periosteum and explore its potential application in guided bone regeneration. Sheep periosteum was collected and decellularized by a modified decellularization protocol. The effectiveness of cell removal was proved by hematoxylin and eosin and 4 0 ,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole staining, DNA quantitative test, and agarose gel electrophoresis. After decellularization, its microstructure was found to become more porous while the integrality of collagen fibers remained undamaged, and the contents of collagen and glycosaminoglycan were not decreased significantly. Biomechanical analysis showed that the elastic modulus was significantly declined, while the yield stress was not affected, probably due to the collagen integrality. In vitro study of CCK-8 assay demonstrated that the acellular periosteum not only had no toxic effect to the MC3T3-E1 cells, but benefited the cell proliferation to some degree. In vivo experiment of guided bone regeneration was performed using a rabbit cranial model.Micro-CT and histological results revealed that the acellular periosteum not only effectively prevented the ingrowth of fibrous connective tissues, but also potentially facilitated bone regeneration. In conclusion, acellular sheep periostea, with wider sources, less costs, and more convenient fabrication process, would have great potential in the employment for guided bone regeneration. K E Y W O R D S acellular periosteum, animal experiment, barrier membrane, extracellular matrix, guided bone regeneration
This study addresses the fabrication of an extracellular matrix material of the acellular sheep periosteum and the systematic evaluation of its biocompatibility to explore its potential application in guided bone regeneration. Sheep periosteum was harvested and decellularized by a combined decellularization protocol. The effectiveness of cell removal was proved and residual α-Gal antigen was also quantitatively detected. Then, mouse MC3T3-E1 cells were seeded onto the acellular periosteum. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to record the whole process of cell adhesion. The CCK-8 assay suggested that the acellular periosteum not only had zero toxic effect on pre-osteoblasts, but played a positive role in cell proliferation. We also tested whether the acellular periosteum possesses favorable osteogenesis induction activity using an alkaline phosphatase (ALP) assay and a quantitative real-time PCR (Col I, Runx2, OCN) assay. An in vivo study of a subcutaneous implantation test using Sprague Dawley (SD) rats was performed to detect the changes in IL-2, IFN-γ and IL-4 in serum and elucidate the host’s local response to acellular periosteum through hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and immunohistochemical staining. The results show that acellular sheep periosteum did not elicit a severe immunogenic response via the Th1 pathway, unlike fresh sheep periosteum. In conclusion, acellular sheep periosteum possesses favorable biocompatibility to be employed for guided bone regeneration.
On account of the poor biocompatibility of synthetic prosthesis, millions of rhinoplasty recipients have been forced to choose autologous costal cartilage as grafts, which suffer from limited availability, morbidity at donor site and prolonged operation time. Here, as a promising alternative to autologous costal cartilage, we developed a novel xenogeneic costal cartilage and explored its feasibility as a rhinoplasty graft for the first time. Adopting an improved decellularization protocol, in which the ionic detergent was substituted by trypsin, the resulting decellularized graft was confirmed to preserve more structural components and better mechanics, and eliminate cellular components effectively. The in vitro and in vivo compatibility experiments demonstrated that the decellularized graft showed excellent biocompatibility and biosecurity. Additionally, the functionality assessment of rhinoplasty was performed in a rabbit model, and the condition of grafts after implantation was comprehensively evaluated. The optimized graft exhibited better capacity to reduce the degradation rate and maintain the morphology, in comparison to the decellularized costal cartilage prepared by conventional protocol. These findings indicate that this optimized graft derived from decellularized xenogeneic costal cartilage provides a new prospective for future investigations of rhinoplasty prosthesis and has great potential for clinical application.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.