The use of T-PRF alone in sinus-lifting operations has successful clinical and histomorphometric results. Bone formation in the T-PRF group was accelerated to 4 months compared to allografts according to the histological results.

No abstract

PTG may be more appropriate for peri-implantitis surgery than xenograft due to inert structure and comfortable use of PTG to provide mechanical support for enlarging the surface area of the implant.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of microgap on clinical and biochemical parameters around dental implants for 1 year. All patients received four implants: group A-Standard Straumann(®) implants, group B-1 mm subcrestal placement of the polished surface of group A implants, group C-esthetic plus Straumann® implants, group D-subcrestal placement of the polished surface of group C implants. Clinical measurements and peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) were collected immediately before loading and at 3rd, 6th, and 12th months after loading, and interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) have been assessed in the crevicular fluid. No significant differences were found in plaque index, gingival index, and probing between the groups throughout the study. However, the PICF volumes of group D were significantly higher than that in the other groups, and group A were significantly lower than the other groups (P < 0.05). With respect to bleeding on probing values, the percentage of BOP (+) sides in group A implants were fewer than group C and D implants (P < 0.05). With regard to IL-1β, the levels of IL-1β in group A were lower than that in the other groups during the study (P < 0.05). In point of TNF-α total amounts, the levels of TNF-α in group A implants were lower than those in group B and D implants (P < 0.05). Moving microgap coronally from alveolar crest could be recommended for the health of periodontal tissues. Most coronal location of microgap can be suggested in order to maintain the peri-implant health status, particularly in implant sites without esthetic priority.

The purpose of this split-mouth, single-blind, controlled clinical study was to evaluate the impact of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) as an adjunct to non-surgical treatment of chronic periodontitis. Twenty-five systemically healthy and non-smoking adults with chronic periodontitis who had at least two bilateral premolar teeth with probing pocket depth (PPD) of 7 ≥ x ≥ 5 mm were included in the study. In the periodontal examination of these patients, PPD, gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI), clinical attachment level (CAL), and bleeding on probing (BOP) were recorded at the baseline, first, third, and sixth months after treatment. Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) samples were taken at the baseline, first week, and first month after treatment. The collected GCF samples were analyzed using the MAGPIX™ system with a Bio-Plex Pro™ Human Cytokine 27-plex kit. After non-surgical periodontal treatment, LLLT with an energy density of 7.64 J/cm was performed four times: immediately after scaling and root planning (SRP) and on the first, third, and seventh day after treatment. In the first month, PPD levels were significantly (p < 0.05) lower in the SRP + LLLT group than in the SRP group. At the third and sixth months, CAL, PPD, and GI were significantly (p < 0.05) lower in the SRP + LLLT group than in the SRP group. Differences in GCF cytokines levels among the group were not statistically significant. Within the limitations of this study, it is indicated that LLLT as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal treatment has a positive impact on clinical parameters.