BACKGROUND Eclampsia is a preventable disease be prevented by making women aware of the avoidable risk factors during their antenatal visits and thereby decreasing the incidence of eclampsia and associated morbidity, mortality and perinatal outcome. Aim-To study the association of sociodemography as a risk factor for eclampsia. Objective-To compare the various parameters of sociodemographic risk factors (namely age, residence, education and socioeconomic status) between the eclamptic and the patients admitted for delivery with no complications. on 282 admitted women. This is a tertiary care hospital and its maternity service is a referral in the care of high risk pregnant women throughout the district. All women selected for the study were divided into two groups, cases and controls. Cases were the patients admitted to labour room with BP >140/90 mmHg, Urine Protein > + 1, with convulsions. Controls were the patients admitted to labour room with BP < 140/90 mmHg, Urine Protein negative, without convulsions. Their age, education, residence and socioeconomic status were compared and analysed. The X 2 test was used to determine levels of statistical significance wherever appropriate. RESULTS Majority of the cases taken into the study were from less than 20 years of age group and 21-30 years of age i.e., 44.68% and 51.77% respectively. High proportion of eclampsias 68.08% belong to rural area, only 31.92% belong to urban area. Majority of eclampsia (89.36%) cases were associated with high rate of illiteracy (89.36%) as compared to controls (47.51%), belonging to rural area (68.08%) and low socioeconomic conditions. Maximum no. of eclamptic women were from low socioeconomic class i.e., 70.92% from class V, 26.24% from class IV, 1.41% from class III and II each and no women from class I according to Modified B G Prasad Socioeconomic Classification. In our study statistically significant association was observed between eclampsia and risk factors. CONCLUSION Eclampsia is a preventable disease by making the patient aware of the risk factors which can be avoided and thereby decreasing the incidence of eclampsia and associated morbidity and mortality.

The wrong tip applications during dental scaling procedure cause roughness, such as scratches, nicks or chips, not only on the teeth surfaces but also on the filling materials. Thus, dental scaling procedure on the restorations should be performed carefully and the roughness sites on the restorations have to be re-polished after scaling to prevent plaque accumulation.

Background/purpose: Cervical tooth abrasion is the loss of tooth material at the cementoenamel junction, and is usually related to faulty brushing habits. In this study, we attempted to evaluate the effects of handedness on tooth-brushing abrasion in terms of brushing habits in left-and right-handed adults. Materials and methods: In total, 488 subjects participating in the study were divided into 2 groups according to hand preference (group I; left-handed and group II; right-handed), and were interviewed about their brushing habits, and their clinical oral conditions such as the plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), and tooth wear index (TWI) were determined. Handedness was determined by a questionnaire that focused on handedness using the Turkish version of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. Results: This study showed that there were no statistically significant differences between groups I and II according to daily tooth-brushing habits, PI, or GI. Statistically significant differences were found between men and women according to the clinical oral scores and brushing habits (P < 0.01). However, there were no statistically significant differences between the mean TWI scores of left-and right-handed groups (P Z 0.12). It was found that an increased frequency and longer duration of tooth-brushing significantly increased the TWI scores in both groups (P < 0.01). It was also found that TWI scores were statistically higher in subjects who brushed horizontally rather than vertically (P < 0.01). Correlations between clinical oral scores (TWI, PI, and GI) and brushing habits were statistically significant (P < 0.01). Conclusion:The oral-hygiene performance of females was better than males. Brushing habits of patients were related to the severity of cervical wear. But no statistically significant relationship was found between hand preference and tooth-brushing abrasion in this study.

This study provides preliminary observations for the development of an animal model of BRONJ. Although clinical and radiological findings were not relevant, serum CTX values are reliable biochemical markers for predicting BRONJ and also atraumatic surgical procedures are important to prevent BRONJ.

The present study suggests that left-handedness appears to be a predictor factor for RAS.

No abstract

Paraformaldehyde-containing pastes have no application in contemporary dentistry. Dentists should avoid toxic preparations for pulp devitalization. Dentists should be aware of the features and management of tissue necrosis resulting from the use of toxic dressing materials.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of systematic manikin-head training and the effectiveness of subgingival scaling applied with hand instruments (curettes) by right- and left-handed dental students on dental chairs (traditional) designed for right-handers. A questionnaire focusing on handedness was administered to 69 voluntary dental students in the third class at the School of Dentistry during pre-participation examination. Handedness was assessed using the Turkish version of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. Then, 18 dental students were specially selected in 2 equal groups according to hand preference: consistent right-handers with Geschwind Scores of +100 (5 female and 4 male) and consistent left-handers with Geschwind Scores of -100 (5 female and 4 male). These two untrained dental student groups received 10 weeks manikin-head training. Subgingival scaling was performed with hand instruments (Gracey curettes) in manikin-head mounted on right-sided dental chairs. At 6 test days each dental student had to instrument 12 test teeth. Effectiveness of subgingival scaling was evaluated by adoption of a grading system. This system had scores from 0 to 3 and was defined by illustrated and described criteria. Statistical analysis was carried out with SPSS. Two groups were statistically compared on all test days. The yet-untrained left-handed dental students begin with a relatively high the mean score of 2.25, compared to the yet-trained right-handed dental students with 1.93, which was statistically significant (p > .05). The right-handed dental students reached the mean score of 0.53, whereas the left-handed dental students reached the mean score of 0.87 on test day 6. Significant differences in the mean scores were found between the two groups for overall surfaces (p < .05), the distal surfaces (p < .01), lingual surfaces (p < .01), and each group of teeth (p < .05). But there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups of students on all test day, except for test day 3 in terms of the mean scores for the facial and mesial surfaces (p > .05). Learning success was observed a high level in both groups through systematical training (p < .0001). The present study has documented that the left-handed dental students were less successful than the right-handed dental students in subgingival scaling, except for mesial and facial surfaces. However although training on right-sided chairs, they were quite similar to their right-handed counterparts in terms of learning success.