Objective: Procedural sedoanalgesia is commonly used in pediatric patients in the emergency department (ED) for interventional procedures, diagnosis, and treatment. However, this method causes serious systemic complications, such as respiratory and cardiac depression. To minimize these complications, ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia methods have been used in recent years. We aimed to compare the use of procedural sedoanalgesia (PSA) and infraclavicular block (ICB) in the pain management of pediatric patients who underwent closed reductions of forearm fractures.Materials and Methods: This prospective, randomized, clinical study included patients aged 3 to 15 years who presented to the ED with forearm fractures. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the procedural sedoanalgesia group (group PSA, n = 30) and ultrasound-guided ICB group (group ICB, n = 30). Pain scores of the patients were evaluated using the Wong-Baker FACES Scale before and during the procedure. Pain scores and parental and operator satisfaction were compared between the groups.Results: There was no statistical significance in terms of demographic data.The pain scores observed during the procedures were significantly higher in the group PSA than in the group ICB (3.07 ± 1.55 vs 0.47 ± 0.86, respectively; P < 0.001). The parental and operator satisfaction of the ICB group was significantly higher than that of the PSA group (P < 0.001).Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided ICB is a safe and effective method in the management of pain during closed reduction of forearm fracture in pediatric patients in EDs. It can be used safely in emergency rooms and has a high level of both parental and operator satisfaction.

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most prevalent peripheral mononeuropathy, characterized by pain, numb-ness, and hypoesthesia in the wrist caused by pressure on the median nerve [1]. Paget (1854) was the first to describe CTS in a patient who had suffered a fracture of the distal radius [2]. The general incidence of CTS is 0.1% to 0.5%. It

No abstract

Quadriceps ruptures are one of the pathological conditions of the knee extensor mechanism, accounting for 3% of all tendon injuries. These injuries cause substantial disability of the extensor mechanism. Primary repair is the treatment of choice in acute presentation. In the setting of chronic conditions, the treatment becomes more challenging. Available surgical options include lengthening procedures, and reconstruction with auto graft or allografts. The traditional Scuderi and Codivilla techniques are challenging to perform in degenerative or traumatic retracted ruptures. There is no standard effective treatment in these patients, which yields the best clinical and biomechanical outcomes. An 18 - year-old male patient with quadriceps re-rupture after a primary repair was managed with allograft reconstruction using suture anchors. At six years of follow-up, the patient gained a full range of motion with excellent clinical outcomes. He returned to his previous work. In conclusion, quadriceps reconstruction using suture anchor and Achilles allograft combination is a feasible technique in neglected cases who present with quadriceps tendon re-rupture after primary surgical repair.