The purpose of this study was to report the effects of smoking on retinal vascular parameters. Methods: In this cross-sectional study design, 24 smokers were included as a study group and 26 age-and sex-matched non-smokers as a control group. A detailed ophthalmic examination including review of medical history, visual acuity testing, intraocular pressure measurement by Goldmann applanation tonometry, ocular movement and pupillary reflex examination, slitlamp biomicroscopy as well as dilated funduscopic examination were undertaken in all participants. Participants underwent optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) scanning with RTVue XR Avanti AngioVue OCT-A (Optovue, Fremont, CA, USA) as well as the measurement of axial length using an AL Scan (Nidek Co., Ltd., Gamagori, Japan). Results: The study comprised of 18 men and six women with a mean age of 28.1 AE 4.8 years in the study group and 19 men and seven women with a mean age of 27.4 AE 2.7 years in the control group. The mean exposure to cigarette smoking was 3.3 AE 1.0 pack-years. Total vascular density, parafoveal vascular density and perifoveal vascular density in the deep capillary plexus observed with OCT-A were significantly lower in the smoking group compared to the control group (p = 0.02, 0.01 and 0.01, respectively). Conclusion: Retinal vascular changes caused by cigarette smoking may occur even at low pack-year exposure. These changes, which can be demonstrated by OCT-A, may reflect the early impact of cigarette smoking on the microvascular system.
Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a metabolic disease characterized by hyperglycemia. Chronic hyperglycemia is associated with long-term dysfunction such as retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy and cardiovascular diseases. These complications increase rates of death and disability worldwide. Due to the negative effects of DM on the quality of life, the mechanism and treatments of the disease should be investigated in more detail. Most of the research in diabetes is performed in experimental animals. Experimental animal models contributed to the advancement of clinical research, the development of new therapeutic approaches, the discovery of insulin and the purification of insulin. There are many animal models of DM in the literature. But there are a few DM model studies created with chick embryos. In these studies, it was seen that there were differences in STZ doses and STZ administration techniques. The objective of this study was to create a more acceptable and easier DM model. 180 specific pathogen free (SPF) fertilized chicken eggs (White Leghorn chicken) were used in this study. STZ was administered to 160 SPF eggs for an induced DM model. The remaining 20 SPF eggs were separated as a control group. We used two different DM models (Air sack model (ASM) and Chorioallantoic membrane model (CAMM)) and blood sampling technique in our study. 160 SPF eggs were divided into two groups with 80 eggs in each group, according to the model in which STZ was administered. When the relationship between blood glucose and blood insulin levels were examined, it was determined that there was a significantly strong negative correlation in the control group and ASM 1 group; and a significantly very strong negative correlation was found in the ASM 2 group and ASM 3 group. Our data indicate that the optimal STZ dose to create a DM model was 0.45 mg/egg and the best DM model was ASM. The second technique to be the best blood sampling technique for determining blood glucose levels. We believe that ASM can be used in DM studies and anti-DM drug studies in terms of its easebly, applicability, reproducibility and low cost.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.