microRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs that post-transcriptionally regulate gene expression by targeting specific mRNAs. Altered expression of circulating miRNAs have been associated with age-related diseases including cancer and cardiovascular disease. Although we and others have found an age-dependent decrease in miRNA expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), little is known about the role of circulating miRNAs in human aging. Here, we examined miRNA expression in human serum from young (mean age 30 years) and old (mean age 64 years) individuals using next generation sequencing technology and real-time quantitative PCR. Of the miRNAs that we found to be present in serum, three were significantly decreased in 20 older individuals compared to 20 younger individuals: miR-151a-5p, miR-181a-5p and miR-1248. Consistent with our data in humans, these miRNAs are also present at lower levels in the serum of elderly rhesus monkeys. In humans, miR-1248 was found to regulate the expression of mRNAs involved in inflammatory pathways and miR-181a was found to correlate negatively with the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNFα and to correlate positively with the anti-inflammatory cytokines TGFβ and IL-10. These results suggest that circulating miRNAs may be a biological marker of aging and could also be important for regulating longevity. Identification of stable miRNA biomarkers in serum could have great potential as a noninvasive diagnostic tool as well as enhance our understanding of physiological changes that occur with age.

The diagnosis of COVID‐19 requires integration of clinical and laboratory data. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) diagnostic assays play a central role in diagnosis and have fixed technical performance metrics. Interpretation becomes challenging because the clinical sensitivity changes as the virus clears and the immune response emerges. Our goal was to examine the clinical sensitivity of two most common SARS‐CoV‐2 diagnostic test modalities, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and serology, over the disease course to provide insight into their clinical interpretation in patients presenting to the hospital. We conducted a single‐center, retrospective study. To derive clinical sensitivity of PCR, we identified 209 PCR‐positive SARS‐CoV‐2 patients with multiple PCR test results (624 total PCR tests) and calculated daily sensitivity from date of symptom onset or first positive test. Clinical sensitivity of PCR decreased with days post symptom onset with >90% clinical sensitivity during the first 5 days after symptom onset, 70%‐71% from Days 9 to 11, and 30% at Day 21. To calculate daily clinical sensitivity by serology, we utilized 157 PCR‐positive patients with a total of 197 specimens tested by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay for IgM, IgG, and IgA anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 antibodies. In contrast to PCR, serological sensitivity increased with days post symptom onset with >50% of patients seropositive by at least one antibody isotype after Day 7, >80% after Day 12, and 100% by Day 21. Taken together, PCR and serology are complimentary modalities that require time‐dependent interpretation. Superimposition of sensitivities over time indicate that serology can function as a reliable diagnostic aid indicating recent or prior infection.

No abstract

Introduction: The diagnosis of COVID-19 requires integration of clinical and laboratory data. SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic assays play a central role in diagnosis and have fixed technical performance metrics. Interpretation becomes challenging because the clinical sensitivity changes as the virus clears and the immune response emerges. Our goal was to examine the clinical sensitivity of two most common SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic test modalities, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and serology, over the disease course to provide insight into their clinical interpretation in patients presenting to the hospital. Methods: A single-center, retrospective study. To derive clinical sensitivity of PCR, we identified 209 PCR-positive SARS-CoV-2 patients with multiple PCR test results (624 total PCR tests) and calculated daily sensitivity from date of symptom onset or first positive test. To calculate daily clinical sensitivity by serology, we utilized 157 PCR-positive patients with a total of 197 specimens tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for IgM, IgG, and IgA anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Results: Clinical sensitivity of PCR decreased with days post symptom onset with >90% clinical sensitivity during the first 5 days after symptom onset, 70-71% from days 9-11, and 30% at day 21. In contrast, serological sensitivity increased with days post symptom onset with >50% of patients seropositive by at least one antibody isotype after day 7, >80% after day 12, and 100% by day 21. Conclusion: PCR and serology are complimentary modalities that require time-dependent interpretation. Superimposition of sensitivities over time indicate that serology can function as a reliable diagnostic aid indicating recent or prior infection.

No abstract

Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) comprises a heterogenous group of rare mature T-cell neoplasms. While some PTCL subtypes are well-characterized by histology, immunophenotype, and recurrent molecular alterations, others remain incompletely defined. In particular, the distinction between CD30+ PTCL, not otherwise specified and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma can be subject to disagreement. We describe a series of 6 JAK2 rearrangements occurring in a cohort of 97 CD30+ ALK− PTCL (6%), assembled after identifying an index case of a novel PABPC1-JAK2 fusion in a case of ALK− anaplastic large cell lymphoma with unusual classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL)-like features. Fusions were identified using a comprehensive next-generation sequencing based assay performed between 2013 and 2020. Five of 6 cases (83%) showed JAK2 rearrangements with 4 novel partners: TFG, PABPC1, ILF3, and MAP7, and 1 case demonstrated a previously described PCM1-JAK2 fusion. By morphology, all cases showed anaplastic large cells and multinucleated Reed-Sternberg–like cells within a polymorphous inflammatory background with frequent eosinophilia reminiscent of CHL. By immunohistochemistry, atypical large cells expressed CD30 with coexpression of at least 1 T-cell marker, aberrant loss of at least 1 T-cell marker and, in 4 of 5 cases stained (80%), unusual CD15 coexpression. These findings suggest that a subset of CD30+ ALK− systemic PTCL with anaplastic morphology carry JAK2 rearrangements, some of which appear to show CHL-like morphologic features. The presence of JAK2 rearrangements in cases of CD30+ PTCL augments current classification and may provide a therapeutic target via JAK2 inhibition.

No abstract

No abstract