Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a rapidly progressing global pandemic that may present with a variety of cardiac manifestations including, but not limited to, myocardial injury, myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, heart failure, cardiomyopathy, shock, thromboembolism, and cardiac arrest. These cardiovascular effects are worse in patients who have pre-existing cardiac conditions such as coronary artery disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and coagulation abnormalities. Other predisposing risk factors include advanced age, immunocompromised state, and underlying systemic inflammatory conditions. Here we review the cellular pathophysiology, clinical manifestations and treatment modalities of the cardiac manifestations seen in patients with COVID-19.

No abstract

Background:The manifestations of COVID-19 as outlined by imaging modalities such as echocardiography, lung ultrasound (LUS), and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging are not fully described. Methods:We conducted a systematic review of the current literature and included studies that described cardiovascular manifestations of COVID-19 using echocardiography, CMR, and pulmonary manifestations using LUS. We queried PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science for relevant articles. Original studies and case series were included.Results: This review describes the most common abnormalities encountered on echocardiography, LUS, and CMR in patients infected with COVID-19.

Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in drastic changes to the practice of medicine, requiring healthcare systems to find solutions to reduce the risk of infection. Using a case series, we propose a protocol for same-day discharge (SDD) for selected patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using real-time remote cardiac monitoring. Six patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis underwent TAVR and were discharged on the same day. Case summary Six patients with symptomatic severe native or bioprosthetic aortic valve stenosis underwent a successful transfemoral TAVR using standard procedures, including the use of rapid atrial pacing to assess the need for permanent pacemaker implantation. Following TAVR, patients were monitored on telemetry in the recovery area for 3 h, ambulated to assess vascular access stability, and discharged with real-time remote cardiac monitoring if no new conduction abnormality was observed. The patients were seen by tele-visits within 2 days and 2 weeks after discharge. Discussion Amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, SDD following successful transfemoral TAVR may be feasible for selected patients and reduce potential COVID-19 exposure.

Background: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the utility of speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) as a tool to evaluate for cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) early in its course. Electrocardiography and echocardiography have limited sensitivity in this role, while advanced imaging modalities such as cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) are limited by cost and availability. Methods: We compiled English language articles that reported left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) or global circumferential strain (GCS) in patients with confirmed extra-cardiac sarcoidosis versus healthy controls. Studies that exclusively included patients with probable or definite CS were excluded. Continuous data were pooled as a standard mean difference (SMD), comparing sarcoidosis group with healthy controls. A random-effect model was adopted in all analyses. Heterogeneity was assessed using Q and I2 statistics. Results: Nine studies were included in our final analysis with an aggregate of 967 patients. LVGLS was significantly lower in the extra-cardiac sarcoidosis group as compared with controls, SMD −3.98, 95% confidence interval (CI): −5.32, −2.64, P < .001, also was significantly lower in patients who suffered major cardiac events (MCE), −3.89, 95% CI −6.14, −1.64, P < .001. GCS was significantly lower in the extra-cardiac sarcoidosis group as compared with controls, SMD: −3.33, 95% CI −4.71, −1.95, P < .001. Conclusion: LVGLS and GCS were significantly lower in extra-cardiac sarcoidosis patients despite not exhibiting any cardiac symptoms. LVGLS correlates with MCEs in CS. Further studies are required to investigate the role of STE in the early screening of CS.