No abstract

Humans with histories of prolonged heavy alcohol use exhibit poorer performance on cognitive tasks associated with problem solving, short-term memory, and visuospatial reasoning, even following the cessation of drinking, when compared with healthy controls. It is unclear, however, whether the cognitive problems are a consequence of alcohol exposure or a contributing factor to alcohol-use disorders. Here, we examined the relationship between performance on a novel object recognition (NOR) task and total alcohol consumption (TAC) in adult male rhesus macaques (n = 12; ETH group; trained to self-administer alcohol). NOR performance in this group was assessed prior to induction of alcohol drinking (“pre”) and, again, after a 1-year abstinence period (“post”) and was compared to the performance of a second group (n = 6; Control group), which was alcohol-naïve. In the NOR task, difficulty was manipulated across three phases by varying specific object features and/or by varying duration of access to objects. For each monkey, we measured aspects of novelty-related behavior including novelty detection, novelty reactivity, and perseverative behavior. TAC during induction and a “free” access period in which the monkey could choose between water and a 4% w/v ethanol solution also was determined. We found that performance deficits in the NOR task were a consequence of high total alcohol intake instead of a predictor of subsequent high intake. Poor NOR performance in drinkers with the highest intakes was characterized by increased perseverative behavior rather than an inability to detect or react to novelty. Finally, the observed deficits are long-lasting – persisting even after a year of abstinence. Given the prevalent and persistent nature of alcohol-induced cognitive deficits in patients in treatment settings, understanding the nature of the deficit and its neural basis could ultimately offer novel treatment approaches based on the reversal of alcohol-induced impairment.

In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.

No abstract

IntroductionThe aim of the present study was to investigate the behavioral effects of the benzodiazepine midazolam in male mice, in models of anxiolysis, learning, and abuse-related effects.MethodsIn a first set of experiments, male Swiss mice were submitted to the training session of a discriminative avoidance (DA) task on the elevated plus maze to evaluate anxiety-like behavior and learning after vehicle or midazolam (1, 2 or 5 mg/kg, i.g.) administration. The same animals were submitted to a conditioned place preference (CPP) protocol with midazolam (1, 2 or 5 mg/kg, i.g.). In a second experiment, outbred (Swiss) and inbred (C57BL/6) male mice were submitted to a two-bottle choice (TBC) oral midazolam drinking procedure. Animals were exposed to one sucrose bottle and one midazolam (0.008, 0.016 or 0.032 mg/ml) plus sucrose bottle.ResultsMidazolam (1 and 2 mg/kg) induced anxiolytic-like effects, and all doses of midazolam prevented animals from learning to avoid the aversive closed arm during the DA training session. Assessment of midazolam reward via the CPP procedure and choice via the TBC procedure showed notable variability. A 2-step cluster analysis for the CPP data showed that midazolam data were well-fitted to 2 separate clusters (preference vs. aversion), albeit with the majority of mice showing preference (75%). Correlational and regression analyses showed no relationship between midazolam reward and anxiolytic-like effects (time spent in the open arms in the DA test) or learning/memory. Two-step cluster analysis of the TBC data also demonstrated that, regardless of strain, mice overall fell into two clusters identified as midazolam-preferring or midazolam-avoiding groups. Both midazolam preference and avoidance were concentration-dependent in a subset of mice.DiscussionOur findings show that midazolam preference is a multifactorial behavior, and is not dependent solely on the emergence of therapeutic (anxiolytic-like) effects, learning impairments, or on genetic factors (inbred vs. outbred animals).