No abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the pozzolanic effect (PE) and filler effect (FE) of rice husk ash (RHA) on the mechanical properties and microstructure of brick aggregate concrete (BAC). For this, concrete cylinders (100 mm × 200 mm) were prepared with 0–25% RHA with water-to-binder ratios of 0.50 at a constant mix-ratio of 1:1.5:3 and cured in water. Test results revealed that the mean particle size of RHA decreases with increasing grinding time. The compressive strength ( ) of BAC due to filler effect are 58.56–94.62% less compared to the pozzolanic effect of RHA for the 10%–25% replacement of cement. Meanwhile, the 15% RHA showed the maximum of BAC due to pozzolanic effect of RHA. The tensile strength ( ) and flexural strength ( ) of BAC due to pozzolanic effect are 60%–150% and 25%–150% higher than that of filler effect of RHA for the 10%–25% replacement of cement respectively. The modulus of elasticity ( ) and Poisson's ratio ) of BAC due to pozzolanic effect are 2%–29% and 27%–43% greater than that of filler effect of RHA for the 10%–25% replacement of cement respectively. BAC with 10–20% RHA shows a dense and homogeneous microstructure. Therefore, inclusion of RHA as a partial replacement of cement possesses a significant pozzolanic effect than the filler effect on the mechanical properties and microstructure of BAC.

This study assessed the strength and durability parameters of brick aggregate concrete (BAC) incorporating rice husk ash (RHA) as a partial replacement of cement. For this, concrete cylinders (100 mm × 200 mm) were made with 0% (control) to 25% RHA as a partial replacement of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) at a mix proportion of 1 : 1.5 : 3 and a water-to-binder (w/b) ratio of 0.50. Specimens were immersed separately in normal water, 3% sodium chloride (NaCl), 5% sodium sulfate (Na2SO4), 5% magnesium sulfate (MgSO4), 1% hydrochloric acid (HCl), and 1% sulfuric acid (H2SO4) solutions for several immersion periods. The slump test results indicated that the workability of BAC containing RHA (RBAC) decreased about 29.69%–75.02% compared to control (0% RHA). After 90 days, the BAC containing RHA (up to 15% replacement) was found approximately 2.28%–6.64% greater compressive strength than that of control concrete. In addition, water absorption and porosity of RBAC were around 17.59%–40.73% and 12.12%–35.68% lower than that of control concrete, respectively. Similarly, RBAC (up to 25% replacement) exhibited roughly 35.62%–54.79% higher resistance against chloride attack and 0.39%–4.56% better resistance against Na2SO4 attack (up to 15% replacement), however, it exhibited inferior resistance against MgSO4 attack compared to control. Meanwhile, BAC with 10% RHA showed about 5.35% and 1.00% superior performance than that of control concrete against HCl and H2SO4 attack, respectively. The relationships between the strength and durability parameters of RBAC also suggested that RHA contributes to improving the strength and durability parameters of BAC.