No abstract

The purposes of this study were: to describe chest CT findings in normal non-smoking controls and cigarette smokers with and without COPD; to compare the prevalence of CT abnormalities with severity of COPD; and to evaluate concordance between visual and quantitative chest CT (QCT) scoring Methods Volumetric inspiratory and expiratory CT scans of 294 subjects, including normal non-smokers, smokers without COPD, and smokers with GOLD Stage I-IV COPD, were scored at a multi-reader workshop using a standardized worksheet. There were fifty-eight observers (33 pulmonologists, 25 radiologists); each scan was scored by 9–11 observers. Interobserver agreement was calculated using kappa statistic. Median score of visual observations was compared with QCT measurements. Results Interobserver agreement was moderate for the presence or absence of emphysema and for the presence of panlobular emphysema; fair for the presence of centrilobular, paraseptal, and bullous emphysema subtypes and for the presence of bronchial wall thickening; and poor for gas trapping, centrilobular nodularity, mosaic attenuation, and bronchial dilation. Agreement was similar for radiologists and pulmonologists. The prevalence on CT readings of most abnormalities (e.g. emphysema, bronchial wall thickening, mosaic attenuation, expiratory gas trapping) increased significantly with greater COPD severity, while the prevalence of centrilobular nodularity decreased. Concordances between visual scoring and quantitative scoring of emphysema, gas trapping and airway wall thickening were 75%, 87% and 65%, respectively. Conclusions Despite substantial inter-observer variation, visual assessment of chest CT scans in cigarette smokers provides information regarding lung disease severity; visual scoring may be complementary to quantitative evaluation.

ObjectivesTo propose and evaluate a technique for automatic quantification of fissural completeness from chest computed tomography (CT) in a database of subjects with severe emphysema.MethodsNinety-six CT studies of patients with severe emphysema were included. The lungs, fissures and lobes were automatically segmented. The completeness of the fissures was calculated as the percentage of the lobar border defined by a fissure. The completeness score of the automatic method was compared with a visual consensus read by three radiologists using boxplots, rank sum tests and ROC analysis.ResultsThe consensus read found 49% (47/96), 15% (14/96) and 67% (64/96) of the right major, right minor and left major fissures to be complete. For all fissures visually assessed as being complete the automatic method resulted in significantly higher completeness scores (mean 92.78%) than for those assessed as being partial or absent (mean 77.16%; all p values <0.001). The areas under the curves for the automatic fissural completeness were 0.88, 0.91 and 0.83 for the right major, right minor and left major fissures respectively.ConclusionsAn automatic method is able to quantify fissural completeness in a cohort of subjects with severe emphysema consistent with a visual consensus read of three radiologists.Key Points• Lobar fissures are important for assessing the extent and distribution of lung disease• Modern CT allows automatic lobar segmentation and assessment of the fissures• This segmentation can also assess the completeness of the fissures.• Such assessment is important for decisions about novel therapies (eg for emphysema).

Background and purpose: To predict treatment response and survival of NSCLC patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), we develop an unsupervised machine learning method for stratifying patients and extracting meta-features simultaneously based on imaging data. Material and methods: This study was performed based on an 18F-FDG-PET dataset of 100 consecutive patients who were treated with SBRT for early stage NSCLC. Each patient’s tumor was characterized by 722 radiomic features. An unsupervised two-way clustering method was used to identify groups of patients and radiomic features simultaneously. The groups of patients were compared in terms of survival and freedom from nodal failure. Meta-features were computed for building survival models to predict survival and free of nodal failure. Results: Differences were found between 2 groups of patients when the patients were clustered into 3 groups in terms of both survival (p = 0.003) and freedom from nodal failure (p = 0.038). Average concordance measures for predicting survival and nodal failure were 0.640 ± 0.029 and 0.664 ± 0.063 respectively, better than those obtained by prediction models built upon clinical variables (p < 0.04). Conclusions: The evaluation results demonstrate that our method allows us to stratify patients and predict survival and freedom from nodal failure with better performance than current alternative methods.

Computed tomography allows assessment of the treatment of emphysema with endobronchial valves. • Endobronchial valves can reduce the volume of an emphysematous lung lobe. • Compensatory expansion is greater in ipsilateral lobes than in the contralateral lung. • Reduced air trapping is measurable by RV/TLC and smaller low attenuation area.