No abstract

PurposeThe Region of Southern Denmark (RSD), covering 1.2 of Denmark’s 5.6 million inhabitants, established a task force to (1) retrieve literature evidence for the clinical use of positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and provide consequent recommendations and further to (2) compare the actual use of PET/CT in the RSD with these recommendations. This article summarizes the results.MethodsA Work Group appointed a professional Subgroup which made Clinician Groups conduct literature reviews on six selected cancers responsible for 5,768 (62.6 %) of 9,213 PET/CT scans in the RSD in 2012. Rapid Evidence Assessment was applied, using the methodology of systematic reviews with predefined limitations to search PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for articles published in English/Danish/Swedish/Norwegian since 2002. PICO questions were defined, data recorded and quality appraised and rated with regard to strength and evidence level. Consequent recommendations for applications of PET/CT were established. The actual use of PET/CT was compared with these, where grades A and B indicated “established” and “useful” and grades C and D “potentially useful” and “non-recommendable” indications, respectively.ResultsOf 11,729 citations, 1,729 were considered for review, and 204 were included. The evidence suggested usefulness of PET/CT in lung, lymphoma, melanoma, head and neck, and colorectal cancers, whereas evidence was sparse in gynaecological cancers. The agreement between actual use of PET/CT and literature-based recommendations was high in the first five mentioned cancers in that 96.2 % of scans were made for grade A or B indications versus only 22.2 % in gynaecological cancers.ConclusionEvidence-based usefulness was reported in five of six selected cancers; evidence was sparse in the sixth, gynaecological cancers. Actual use of PET/CT agreed well with recommendations.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00259-015-3217-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The purpose of this study was to determine the detection rate of distant metastasis and synchronous cancer, comparing clinically used imaging strategies based on chest x-ray + head and neck MRI (CXR/MRI) and chest CT + head and neck MRI (CHCT/MRI) with F-FDG PET/CT upfront in the diagnostic workup of patients with oral, pharyngeal, or laryngeal cancer. This was a prospective cohort study based on paired data. Consecutive patients with histologically verified primary head and squamous cell carcinoma at Odense University Hospital from September 2013 to March 2016 were considered for the study. Included patients underwent CXR/MRI and CHCT/MRI as well as PET/CT on the same day and before biopsy. Scans were read masked by separate teams of experienced nuclear physicians or radiologists. The true detection rate of distant metastasis and synchronous cancer was assessed for CXR/MRI, CHCT/MRI, and PET/CT. A total of 307 patients were included. CXR/MRI correctly detected 3 (1%) patients with distant metastasis, CHCT/MRI detected 11 (4%) patients, and PET/CT detected 18 (6%) patients. The absolute differences of 5% and 2%, respectively, were statistically significant in favor of PET/CT. Also, PET/CT correctly detected 25 (8%) synchronous cancers, which was significantly more than CXR/MRI (3 patients, 1%) and CHCT/MRI (6 patients, 2%). The true detection rate of distant metastasis or synchronous cancer with PET/CT was 13% (40 patients), which was significantly higher than 2% (6 patients) for CXR/MRI and 6% (17 patients) for CHCT/MRI. A clinical imaging strategy based on PET/CT demonstrated a significantly higher detection rate of distant metastasis or synchronous cancer than strategies in current clinical imaging guidelines, of which European ones primarily recommend CXR/MRI, whereas U.S. guidelines preferably point to CHCT/MRI in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

No abstract

Extranodal extension (ENE) is a very strong prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. However, significant variance in reported incidence of ENE suggests discordance in perception of ENE among pathologists. This study aims to map the different definitions of histopathological ENE used in the literature. A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement. Guided by the research question: "How is histopathological ENE defined?" the databases Medline, Embase, and Cochrane were systematically searched. All retrieved studies were reviewed and qualitatively analyzed. Three categories of existing definitions were formed. The systematic literature search yielded 1786 studies after removal of duplicates. Nine hundred and thirty-four full text articles were assessed for inclusion and 44 unique ENE definitions were identified and categorized 1-3; (1) simple definitions only describing a breach in the capsule (48%), (2) definitions also including a description of the perinodal tissue (43%), and (3) definitions adding a description of a specific reaction in the perinodal structure (9%). No consensus definition of ENE exists, but based on the level of details in the identified definitions, three overall categories of ENE definitions were established.