No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The effects of dietary supplementation with omega-3-polyunsaturated fatty acids (omega-3-PUFA) on the proliferative response of PBMC and on the secretion of monokines and arachidonic acid metabolites from PBMC and monocytes (Mo) from healthy subjects and patients with recent-onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) were examined. Three groups of eight to nine healthy individuals were randomized to either 2.0 g/day or 4.0 g/day of omega-3-PUFA devoid of vitamins A and D, or an isocaloric amount of placebo. Furthermore, eight patients with recent-onset IDDM received 4.0 g/day of omega-3-PUFA. IL-1 beta production and TNF-alpha secretion was determined before and after 7 weeks of treatment, and 10 weeks after withdrawal of treatment. Significant increases in platelet and PBMC membrane eicosapentaenoic acid was found in omega-3-PUFA-treated individuals. omega-3-PUFA treatment significantly reduced the content of IL-1 beta in lysates of PBMC, but did not affect PBMC or Mo secretion of IL-1 beta, TNF-alpha or prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) or PBMC leukotriene B4 (LTB4) secretion in healthy subjects or in IDDM patients. A significant inhibition of the PHA-stimulated, but not the spontaneous or PPD-stimulated, proliferative response of PBMC was observed in healthy and diabetic subjects treated with omega-3-PUFA. No correlation was found between PHA-stimulated PBMC proliferation and PBMC secretion of TNF-alpha and IL-1 beta. There were no significant differences in the spontaneous or the PPD- or PHA-stimulated proliferative responses of PBMC between diabetic and healthy individuals at entry. We conclude that although dietary supplementation with 4.0 g/day of omega-3-PUFA inhibits the proliferation of PBMC and reduces IL-1 beta immunoreactivity in PBMC and Mo, it does not alter monokine, PGE2 or LTB4, secretion in healthy or IDDM subjects.

BackgroundPancreatic cancer has a 5-year survival rate of only 5–7%. Difficulties in detecting pancreatic cancer at early stages results in the high mortality and substantiates the need for additional diagnostic tools. Surgery is the only curative treatment and unfortunately only possible in localized tumours. A diagnostic biomarker for pancreatic cancer will have a major impact on patient survival by facilitating early detection and the possibility for curative treatment. DNA promoter hypermethylation is a mechanism of early carcinogenesis, which can cause inactivation of tumour suppressor genes. The aim of this study was to examine promoter hypermethylation in a panel of selected genes from cell-free DNA, as a diagnostic marker for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.MethodsPatients with suspected or biopsy-verified pancreatic cancer were included prospectively and consecutively. Patients with chronic/acute pancreatitis were included as additional benign control groups. Based on an optimized accelerated bisulfite treatment protocol, methylation-specific PCR of a 28 gene panel was performed on plasma samples. A diagnostic prediction model was developed by multivariable logistic regression analysis using backward stepwise elimination.ResultsPatients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 95), chronic pancreatitis (n = 97) and acute pancreatitis (n = 59) and patients screened, but negative for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 27), were included. The difference in mean number of methylated genes in the cancer group (8.41 (95% CI 7.62–9.20)) vs the total control group (4.74 (95% CI 4.40–5.08)) was highly significant (p < 0.001). A diagnostic prediction model (age >65, BMP3, RASSF1A, BNC1, MESTv2, TFPI2, APC, SFRP1 and SFRP2) had an area under the curve of 0.86 (sensitivity 76%, specificity 83%). The model performance was independent of cancer stage.ConclusionsCell-free DNA promoter hypermethylation has the potential to be a diagnostic marker for pancreatic adenocarcinoma and differentiate between malignant and benign pancreatic disease. This study brings us closer to a clinical useful diagnostic marker for pancreatic cancer, which is urgently needed. External validation is, however, required before the test can be applied in the clinic.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02079363 Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13148-016-0286-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers in the western world. Screening is an efficient method of reducing cancer-related mortality. Molecular biomarkers for cancer in general and CRC in particular have been proposed, and hypermethylated DNA from stool or blood samples are already implemented as biomarkers for CRC screening.We aimed to evaluate the performance of proven hypermethylated DNA promoter regions as plasma based biomarkers for CRC detection.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional case-control study of 193 CRC patients and 102 colonoscopy-verified healthy controls. Using methylation specific polymerase chain reaction, we evaluated 30 DNA promoter regions previously found to be CRC specific. We used multivariable logistic regression with stepwise backwards selection, and subsequent leave-pair-out cross validation, to calculate the optimism corrected area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) for all stage as well as early stage CRC.ResultsNone of the individual DNA promoter regions provided an overall sensitivity above 30% at a reasonable specificity. However, seven hypermethylated promoter regions (ALX4, BMP3, NPTX2, RARB, SDC2, SEPT9, and VIM) along with the covariates sex and age yielded an optimism corrected AUC of 0.86 for all stage CRC and 0.85 for early stage CRC. Overall sensitivity for CRC detection was 90.7% at 72.5% specificity using a cut point value of 0.5.ConclusionsIndividual hypermethylated DNA promoter regions have limited value as CRC screening markers. However, a panel of seven hypermethylated promoter regions show great promise as a model for CRC detection.

SummaryThe F5 G1691A (Factor V Leiden) and F2 G20210A (prothrombin) mutations are linked to an increase in the incidence rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but their effects are highly variable. We investigated whether the effects of smoking and obesity might explain this variability. In a case-cohort study including the participants of the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health study, we computed incidence rates and Cox proportional hazard ratios for VTE in individuals with and without the mutations, categorized by weight and tobacco consumption. The sole effect of heavy smoking was 128 extra VTE events per 100 000 person years in individuals with the F5 G1691A mutation versus 59 in individuals without. The sole effect of obesity was 222 extra VTE events per 100 000 person years in individuals with the F5 G1691A mutation, versus 103 in individuals without this mutation; and 705 extra VTE events per 100 000 person years in individuals with the F2 G20210A mutation versus 107 in individuals without this mutation. The F5 G1691A and F2 G20210A mutations conferred increased susceptibility to the unfavourable effects of smoking and obesity on the risk for VTE. Thus, individuals with genetic risk factors for VTE might benefit from maintaining a healthy lifestyle.

Hypermethylation of the promoters of specific genes measured in blood or stool samples could be used as a CRC biomarker and provide prognostic information. The majority of studies, however, include only a few patients with poorly defined control groups. Further studies are therefore needed before hypermethylated DNA can be widely applied as a clinical biomarker for CRC detection and prognosis.